Effects of Local Anesthetic on the Time Between Analgesic Boluses and the Duration of Labor in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Study of Two Ultra-Low Dose Regimens of Ropivacaine and Sufentanil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa-Martins, José Manuel
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Dias, Cláudia Camila, Pereira, Marco, Tavares, Jorge
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708
Resumo: Background: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with low concentrations of anesthetics is effective in reducing labor pain. The aim of this study was to assess and compare two ultra-low dose regimens of ropivacaine and sufentanil (0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil vs. 0.06% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) on the intervals between boluses and the duration of labor.Material and Methods: In this non-randomized prospective study, conducted between January and July 2010, two groups of parturients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia: Group I (n = 58; 1 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) and Group II (n = 57; 0.6 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil). Rescue doses of ropivacaine at the concentration of the assigned group without sufentanil were administered as necessary. Pain, local anesthetic requirements, neuraxial blockade characteristics, labor and neonatal outcomes, and maternal satisfaction were recorded.Results: The ropivacaine dose was greater in Group I (9.5 [7.7-12.7] mg.h-1 vs. 6.1 [5.1-9.8 mg.h-1], p < 0.001). A time increase between each bolus was observed in Group I (beta = 32.61 min, 95% CI [25.39; 39.82], p < 0.001), whereas a time decrease was observed in Group II (beta = -1.40 min, 95% CI [-2.44; -0.36], p = 0.009). The duration of the second stage of labor in Group I was significantly longerthan that in Group II (78 min vs. 65 min, p < 0.001).Conclusions: Parturients receiving 0.06% ropivacaine exhibited less evidence of cumulative effects and exhibited faster second stage progression than those who received 0.1% ropivacaine.Keywords: Analgesia, Obstetrical; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Labor Pain; Ropivacaine; Sufentanil.
id RCAP_6bd351ea0ea6145469565daeb79de8b8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5708
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Effects of Local Anesthetic on the Time Between Analgesic Boluses and the Duration of Labor in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Study of Two Ultra-Low Dose Regimens of Ropivacaine and SufentanilEfeitos de Anestésico Local no Tempo Entre Bólus e na Duração do Trabalho de Parto em Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Estudo Prospectivo de Dois Regimes de Doses Ultra-Baixas com Ropivacaina e Sufentanil Coimbra. Portugal.Background: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with low concentrations of anesthetics is effective in reducing labor pain. The aim of this study was to assess and compare two ultra-low dose regimens of ropivacaine and sufentanil (0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil vs. 0.06% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) on the intervals between boluses and the duration of labor.Material and Methods: In this non-randomized prospective study, conducted between January and July 2010, two groups of parturients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia: Group I (n = 58; 1 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) and Group II (n = 57; 0.6 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil). Rescue doses of ropivacaine at the concentration of the assigned group without sufentanil were administered as necessary. Pain, local anesthetic requirements, neuraxial blockade characteristics, labor and neonatal outcomes, and maternal satisfaction were recorded.Results: The ropivacaine dose was greater in Group I (9.5 [7.7-12.7] mg.h-1 vs. 6.1 [5.1-9.8 mg.h-1], p < 0.001). A time increase between each bolus was observed in Group I (beta = 32.61 min, 95% CI [25.39; 39.82], p < 0.001), whereas a time decrease was observed in Group II (beta = -1.40 min, 95% CI [-2.44; -0.36], p = 0.009). The duration of the second stage of labor in Group I was significantly longerthan that in Group II (78 min vs. 65 min, p < 0.001).Conclusions: Parturients receiving 0.06% ropivacaine exhibited less evidence of cumulative effects and exhibited faster second stage progression than those who received 0.1% ropivacaine.Keywords: Analgesia, Obstetrical; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Labor Pain; Ropivacaine; Sufentanil.Introdução: A patient-controlled epidural analgesia com baixas concentrações de anestésicos é eficaz na redução da dor de parto. O objectivo deste estudo foi comparar dois regimes de doses ultrabaixas de ropivacaína e sufentanil (0,1% ropivacaína associada a 0,5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil vs. 0,06% ropivacaína associada a 0,5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) nos intervalos entre bólus e na duração do trabalho de parto.Material e Métodos: Neste estudo prospectivo não-randomizado, realizado entre Janeiro e Julho de 2010, dois grupos de parturientes receberam patient-controlled epidural analgesia: o Grupo I (n = 58; 1 mg.ml-1 ropivacaína + 0,5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) e o Grupo II (n = 57; 0,6 mg.ml-1 ropivacaína + 0,5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil). Quando necessário administraram-se doses de resgate de ropivacaína na concentração definida para cada grupo e sem sufentanil. Registaram-se a dor, os consumos de analgésicos, as características do bloqueio neuroaxial, do trabalho de parto, do recém-nascido, e a satisfação materna.Resultados: A dose de ropivacaína foi maior no Grupo I (9,5 [7,7-12,7] mg.h-1 vs. 6,1 [5,1-9,8 mg.h-1], p < 0,001). No Grupo I observouse um aumento do intervalo de tempo entre bólus (beta = 32,61 min, 95% CI [25,39; 39,82], p < 0,001), enquanto no Grupo II se observou uma diminuição dos intervalos (beta = -1,40 min, 95% CI [-2,44; -0,36], p = 0,009). A duração do segundo estadio do trabalho de parto foi significativamente maior no Grupo I do que no Grupo II (78 min vs. 65 min, p < 0,001).Conclusões: As parturientes que receberam ropivacaína a 0,06% exibiram uma menor evidência de efeitos cumulativos e um segundo estadio do trabalho de parto mais rápido do que as que receberam ropivacaína a 0,1%.Palavras-chave: Analgesia Controlada pelo Doente; Analgesia Obstétrica; Dor do Parto; Ropivacaína; Sufentanil.Ordem dos Médicos2015-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfimage/jpegapplication/pdfimage/jpeghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5708Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 28 No. 1 (2015): January-February; 70-76Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 28 N.º 1 (2015): Janeiro-Fevereiro; 70-761646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708/4239https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708/7521https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708/7522https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708/7523https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708/7524Costa-Martins, José ManuelDias, Cláudia CamilaPereira, MarcoTavares, Jorgeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:04:26Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5708Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:08.880345Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of Local Anesthetic on the Time Between Analgesic Boluses and the Duration of Labor in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Study of Two Ultra-Low Dose Regimens of Ropivacaine and Sufentanil
Efeitos de Anestésico Local no Tempo Entre Bólus e na Duração do Trabalho de Parto em Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Estudo Prospectivo de Dois Regimes de Doses Ultra-Baixas com Ropivacaina e Sufentanil Coimbra. Portugal.
title Effects of Local Anesthetic on the Time Between Analgesic Boluses and the Duration of Labor in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Study of Two Ultra-Low Dose Regimens of Ropivacaine and Sufentanil
spellingShingle Effects of Local Anesthetic on the Time Between Analgesic Boluses and the Duration of Labor in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Study of Two Ultra-Low Dose Regimens of Ropivacaine and Sufentanil
Costa-Martins, José Manuel
title_short Effects of Local Anesthetic on the Time Between Analgesic Boluses and the Duration of Labor in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Study of Two Ultra-Low Dose Regimens of Ropivacaine and Sufentanil
title_full Effects of Local Anesthetic on the Time Between Analgesic Boluses and the Duration of Labor in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Study of Two Ultra-Low Dose Regimens of Ropivacaine and Sufentanil
title_fullStr Effects of Local Anesthetic on the Time Between Analgesic Boluses and the Duration of Labor in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Study of Two Ultra-Low Dose Regimens of Ropivacaine and Sufentanil
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Local Anesthetic on the Time Between Analgesic Boluses and the Duration of Labor in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Study of Two Ultra-Low Dose Regimens of Ropivacaine and Sufentanil
title_sort Effects of Local Anesthetic on the Time Between Analgesic Boluses and the Duration of Labor in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Study of Two Ultra-Low Dose Regimens of Ropivacaine and Sufentanil
author Costa-Martins, José Manuel
author_facet Costa-Martins, José Manuel
Dias, Cláudia Camila
Pereira, Marco
Tavares, Jorge
author_role author
author2 Dias, Cláudia Camila
Pereira, Marco
Tavares, Jorge
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa-Martins, José Manuel
Dias, Cláudia Camila
Pereira, Marco
Tavares, Jorge
description Background: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with low concentrations of anesthetics is effective in reducing labor pain. The aim of this study was to assess and compare two ultra-low dose regimens of ropivacaine and sufentanil (0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil vs. 0.06% ropivacaine plus 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) on the intervals between boluses and the duration of labor.Material and Methods: In this non-randomized prospective study, conducted between January and July 2010, two groups of parturients received patient-controlled epidural analgesia: Group I (n = 58; 1 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil) and Group II (n = 57; 0.6 mg.ml-1 ropivacaine + 0.5 μg.ml-1 sufentanil). Rescue doses of ropivacaine at the concentration of the assigned group without sufentanil were administered as necessary. Pain, local anesthetic requirements, neuraxial blockade characteristics, labor and neonatal outcomes, and maternal satisfaction were recorded.Results: The ropivacaine dose was greater in Group I (9.5 [7.7-12.7] mg.h-1 vs. 6.1 [5.1-9.8 mg.h-1], p < 0.001). A time increase between each bolus was observed in Group I (beta = 32.61 min, 95% CI [25.39; 39.82], p < 0.001), whereas a time decrease was observed in Group II (beta = -1.40 min, 95% CI [-2.44; -0.36], p = 0.009). The duration of the second stage of labor in Group I was significantly longerthan that in Group II (78 min vs. 65 min, p < 0.001).Conclusions: Parturients receiving 0.06% ropivacaine exhibited less evidence of cumulative effects and exhibited faster second stage progression than those who received 0.1% ropivacaine.Keywords: Analgesia, Obstetrical; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Labor Pain; Ropivacaine; Sufentanil.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5708
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5708
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708/4239
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708/7521
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708/7522
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708/7523
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5708/7524
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
image/jpeg
application/pdf
image/jpeg
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 28 No. 1 (2015): January-February; 70-76
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 28 N.º 1 (2015): Janeiro-Fevereiro; 70-76
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130642362925056