Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinho, Micaela
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Borges, Ana Pinto, Cookson, Richard
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1853
Resumo: The main aim of this paper is to investigate the views of healthcare professionals in Portugal about healthcare rationing, and compare them with the views of college students. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of 60 healthcare professionals and 180 college students. Respondents faced a hypothetical rationing dilemma where they had to order four patients (differentiated by personal characteristics and health conditions) and justify their choices. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to test for differences in orderings, and content analysis to categorize the written justifications. The findings suggest that both groups appeared to support three main rationing principles: (i) health maximization, (ii) priority to the severely ill and (iii) priority to the young. However, professionals seemed to give less weight to the latter principle. In conclusion, professionals have similar views to students about healthcare rationing, though may be slightly less inclined to give priority to the young.
id RCAP_6c11e6f0dcf648634ccfcf090bb1d3de
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uportu.pt:11328/1853
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in PortugalThe main aim of this paper is to investigate the views of healthcare professionals in Portugal about healthcare rationing, and compare them with the views of college students. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of 60 healthcare professionals and 180 college students. Respondents faced a hypothetical rationing dilemma where they had to order four patients (differentiated by personal characteristics and health conditions) and justify their choices. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to test for differences in orderings, and content analysis to categorize the written justifications. The findings suggest that both groups appeared to support three main rationing principles: (i) health maximization, (ii) priority to the severely ill and (iii) priority to the young. However, professionals seemed to give less weight to the latter principle. In conclusion, professionals have similar views to students about healthcare rationing, though may be slightly less inclined to give priority to the young.Oxford Academic2017-05-31T10:56:06Z2017-05-01T00:00:00Z2017-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11328/1853eng10.1093/phe/phx005Pinho, MicaelaBorges, Ana PintoCookson, Richardinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-06-15T02:10:08ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal
title Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal
spellingShingle Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal
Pinho, Micaela
title_short Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal
title_full Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal
title_fullStr Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal
title_sort Do healthcare professionals have different views about healthcare rationing than college students? A mixed methods study in Portugal
author Pinho, Micaela
author_facet Pinho, Micaela
Borges, Ana Pinto
Cookson, Richard
author_role author
author2 Borges, Ana Pinto
Cookson, Richard
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinho, Micaela
Borges, Ana Pinto
Cookson, Richard
description The main aim of this paper is to investigate the views of healthcare professionals in Portugal about healthcare rationing, and compare them with the views of college students. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of 60 healthcare professionals and 180 college students. Respondents faced a hypothetical rationing dilemma where they had to order four patients (differentiated by personal characteristics and health conditions) and justify their choices. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to test for differences in orderings, and content analysis to categorize the written justifications. The findings suggest that both groups appeared to support three main rationing principles: (i) health maximization, (ii) priority to the severely ill and (iii) priority to the young. However, professionals seemed to give less weight to the latter principle. In conclusion, professionals have similar views to students about healthcare rationing, though may be slightly less inclined to give priority to the young.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-31T10:56:06Z
2017-05-01T00:00:00Z
2017-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1853
url http://hdl.handle.net/11328/1853
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1093/phe/phx005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Academic
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Academic
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777302551247454209