Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4838 |
Resumo: | In Paraisópolis, a slum in São Paulo (Brazil) housing over 100.000 inhabitants, the Covid crisis seemed to have less of a death toll (0,0217%) than in other areas of the city (an average of 0,0652% as of May 2020); or at least it did at first. The sense of community in the area is strong, leading to many community initiatives and organisations to rise to the challenge of combating the pandemic with little help from the authorities. The community’s initial efficient response to the Covid crisis relied heavily on self‐reliance and self‐organization to mobilise common resources. Despite their later failure in containing the virus, the community’s response to the pandemic is exemplary of a well‐known phenomenon: how communities are able to mobilise the commons to create general welfare. The commons concept is used in this contribution to help us better understand slum governance and the power and limitations of community reliance. At the same time, we aim to refine our understanding of the commons as a contentious category rooted in agonistic relationships instead of the romanticised leftist social imaginary that views the commons as purely anti‐capitalist. Thus, we explicitly argue for a view of the commons and commoning that transcends the narrow “Leftist imaginary” of the commons as egalitarian, inclusive, anti‐capitalist, horizontal, and as expressions of sharing (and caring), and instead views the commons as embedded in everyday realities, where commoning practices emerge as practises that support the reproduction of (social) life. |
id |
RCAP_6c9cfba6876fcee7f3da4c2f30c71535 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4838 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the Citycommons and commoning; community reliance; Covid‐19 responses; grassroots and the state; informal settlementsIn Paraisópolis, a slum in São Paulo (Brazil) housing over 100.000 inhabitants, the Covid crisis seemed to have less of a death toll (0,0217%) than in other areas of the city (an average of 0,0652% as of May 2020); or at least it did at first. The sense of community in the area is strong, leading to many community initiatives and organisations to rise to the challenge of combating the pandemic with little help from the authorities. The community’s initial efficient response to the Covid crisis relied heavily on self‐reliance and self‐organization to mobilise common resources. Despite their later failure in containing the virus, the community’s response to the pandemic is exemplary of a well‐known phenomenon: how communities are able to mobilise the commons to create general welfare. The commons concept is used in this contribution to help us better understand slum governance and the power and limitations of community reliance. At the same time, we aim to refine our understanding of the commons as a contentious category rooted in agonistic relationships instead of the romanticised leftist social imaginary that views the commons as purely anti‐capitalist. Thus, we explicitly argue for a view of the commons and commoning that transcends the narrow “Leftist imaginary” of the commons as egalitarian, inclusive, anti‐capitalist, horizontal, and as expressions of sharing (and caring), and instead views the commons as embedded in everyday realities, where commoning practices emerge as practises that support the reproduction of (social) life.Cogitatio2022-02-22info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4838oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4838Social Inclusion; Vol 10, No 1 (2022): The Politics and Aesthetics of the Urban Commons: Navigating the Gaze of the City, the State, the Market; 91-1022183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4838https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4838https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4838/4838Copyright (c) 2022 Caroline Newton, Roberto Roccohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNewton, CarolineRocco, Roberto2022-12-20T11:00:11Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4838Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:37.948527Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City |
title |
Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City |
spellingShingle |
Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City Newton, Caroline commons and commoning; community reliance; Covid‐19 responses; grassroots and the state; informal settlements |
title_short |
Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City |
title_full |
Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City |
title_fullStr |
Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City |
title_full_unstemmed |
Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City |
title_sort |
Actually Existing Commons: Using the Commons to Reclaim the City |
author |
Newton, Caroline |
author_facet |
Newton, Caroline Rocco, Roberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocco, Roberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Newton, Caroline Rocco, Roberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
commons and commoning; community reliance; Covid‐19 responses; grassroots and the state; informal settlements |
topic |
commons and commoning; community reliance; Covid‐19 responses; grassroots and the state; informal settlements |
description |
In Paraisópolis, a slum in São Paulo (Brazil) housing over 100.000 inhabitants, the Covid crisis seemed to have less of a death toll (0,0217%) than in other areas of the city (an average of 0,0652% as of May 2020); or at least it did at first. The sense of community in the area is strong, leading to many community initiatives and organisations to rise to the challenge of combating the pandemic with little help from the authorities. The community’s initial efficient response to the Covid crisis relied heavily on self‐reliance and self‐organization to mobilise common resources. Despite their later failure in containing the virus, the community’s response to the pandemic is exemplary of a well‐known phenomenon: how communities are able to mobilise the commons to create general welfare. The commons concept is used in this contribution to help us better understand slum governance and the power and limitations of community reliance. At the same time, we aim to refine our understanding of the commons as a contentious category rooted in agonistic relationships instead of the romanticised leftist social imaginary that views the commons as purely anti‐capitalist. Thus, we explicitly argue for a view of the commons and commoning that transcends the narrow “Leftist imaginary” of the commons as egalitarian, inclusive, anti‐capitalist, horizontal, and as expressions of sharing (and caring), and instead views the commons as embedded in everyday realities, where commoning practices emerge as practises that support the reproduction of (social) life. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-22 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4838 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4838 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4838 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4838 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4838 https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4838 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4838/4838 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Caroline Newton, Roberto Rocco http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Caroline Newton, Roberto Rocco http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Inclusion; Vol 10, No 1 (2022): The Politics and Aesthetics of the Urban Commons: Navigating the Gaze of the City, the State, the Market; 91-102 2183-2803 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130662942277632 |