Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1822/61978 |
Resumo: | There is growing concern that poor experimental design and lack of transparent reporting contribute to the frequent failure of pre-clinical animal studies to translate into treatments for human disease. In 2010, the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines were introduced to help improve reporting standards. They were published in PLOS Biology and endorsed by funding agencies and publishers and their journals, including PLOS, Nature research journals, and other top-tier journals. Yet our analysis of papers published in PLOS and Nature journals indicates that there has been very little improvement in reporting standards since then. This suggests that authors, referees, and editors generally are ignoring guidelines, and the editorial endorsement is yet to be effectively implemented. |
id |
RCAP_6ee3de7d071da1f442e28b6597203fca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/61978 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studiesAnimal experimentationAnimalsHumansPublishingResearch designStatistics as topicEditorial policiesGuidelines as topicScience & TechnologyThere is growing concern that poor experimental design and lack of transparent reporting contribute to the frequent failure of pre-clinical animal studies to translate into treatments for human disease. In 2010, the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines were introduced to help improve reporting standards. They were published in PLOS Biology and endorsed by funding agencies and publishers and their journals, including PLOS, Nature research journals, and other top-tier journals. Yet our analysis of papers published in PLOS and Nature journals indicates that there has been very little improvement in reporting standards since then. This suggests that authors, referees, and editors generally are ignoring guidelines, and the editorial endorsement is yet to be effectively implemented.The authors received no specific funding for this work. We acknowledge the support, in the form of Dr. Lidster's salary, of the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.PLOSUniversidade do MinhoBaker, DavidLidster, KatieSottomayor, AnaAmor, Sandra2014-012014-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/61978eng1544-91731545-788510.1371/journal.pbio.100175624409096info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:02:21Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/61978Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:52:18.471536Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies |
title |
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies |
spellingShingle |
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies Baker, David Animal experimentation Animals Humans Publishing Research design Statistics as topic Editorial policies Guidelines as topic Science & Technology |
title_short |
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies |
title_full |
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies |
title_fullStr |
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies |
title_sort |
Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies |
author |
Baker, David |
author_facet |
Baker, David Lidster, Katie Sottomayor, Ana Amor, Sandra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lidster, Katie Sottomayor, Ana Amor, Sandra |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Baker, David Lidster, Katie Sottomayor, Ana Amor, Sandra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Animal experimentation Animals Humans Publishing Research design Statistics as topic Editorial policies Guidelines as topic Science & Technology |
topic |
Animal experimentation Animals Humans Publishing Research design Statistics as topic Editorial policies Guidelines as topic Science & Technology |
description |
There is growing concern that poor experimental design and lack of transparent reporting contribute to the frequent failure of pre-clinical animal studies to translate into treatments for human disease. In 2010, the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines were introduced to help improve reporting standards. They were published in PLOS Biology and endorsed by funding agencies and publishers and their journals, including PLOS, Nature research journals, and other top-tier journals. Yet our analysis of papers published in PLOS and Nature journals indicates that there has been very little improvement in reporting standards since then. This suggests that authors, referees, and editors generally are ignoring guidelines, and the editorial endorsement is yet to be effectively implemented. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/61978 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/61978 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1544-9173 1545-7885 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001756 24409096 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PLOS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PLOS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132298710351872 |