Evolution of law on anticipatory bail in India
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11144/5040 |
Resumo: | Sushila Aggarwal v State (NCT of Delhi) forms an important part of the law on anticipatory Bail in India. Prior to Sushila Aggarwal judgment, the law on anticipatory bail in India was ambiguous due to the varying interpretations of section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 (anticipatory bail) by the Supreme Court. It was only in the year 2020 that the law on the matter was settled by the Supreme Court in its Sushila Aggarwal judgment. With this paper, the authors aim to trace the evolution of the law on anticipatory bail in India. It focusses on the landmark judgments of the Supreme Court and meanders its way through conflicting opinions of the Court. The paper concludes by welcoming the Sushila Aggarwal judgment for settling the long ambiguous law on anticipatory bail in India. However, it also highlights the concerns that Constitution Bench failed to appreciate, which if addressed would have made the law free of the loopholes presently plaguing the law on anticipatory bail. |
id |
RCAP_7087b8a6ffcc8d3354fb53b0294f27ad |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ual.pt:11144/5040 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Evolution of law on anticipatory bail in IndiaSushila Aggarwal v State (NCT of Delhi),Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v State of PunjabSection 438 Code of Criminal Procedure 1973Anticipatory Bail and BailSushila Aggarwal v State (NCT of Delhi) forms an important part of the law on anticipatory Bail in India. Prior to Sushila Aggarwal judgment, the law on anticipatory bail in India was ambiguous due to the varying interpretations of section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 (anticipatory bail) by the Supreme Court. It was only in the year 2020 that the law on the matter was settled by the Supreme Court in its Sushila Aggarwal judgment. With this paper, the authors aim to trace the evolution of the law on anticipatory bail in India. It focusses on the landmark judgments of the Supreme Court and meanders its way through conflicting opinions of the Court. The paper concludes by welcoming the Sushila Aggarwal judgment for settling the long ambiguous law on anticipatory bail in India. However, it also highlights the concerns that Constitution Bench failed to appreciate, which if addressed would have made the law free of the loopholes presently plaguing the law on anticipatory bail.OBSERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa2021-05-03T10:04:13Z2021-05-01T00:00:00Z2021-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11144/5040eng1647-7251https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.12.1.14Shah, MalikaChadha, Vaibhavinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-11T02:09:12Zoai:repositorio.ual.pt:11144/5040Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:31:41.643159Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evolution of law on anticipatory bail in India |
title |
Evolution of law on anticipatory bail in India |
spellingShingle |
Evolution of law on anticipatory bail in India Shah, Malika Sushila Aggarwal v State (NCT of Delhi), Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v State of Punjab Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 Anticipatory Bail and Bail |
title_short |
Evolution of law on anticipatory bail in India |
title_full |
Evolution of law on anticipatory bail in India |
title_fullStr |
Evolution of law on anticipatory bail in India |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evolution of law on anticipatory bail in India |
title_sort |
Evolution of law on anticipatory bail in India |
author |
Shah, Malika |
author_facet |
Shah, Malika Chadha, Vaibhav |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Chadha, Vaibhav |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Shah, Malika Chadha, Vaibhav |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sushila Aggarwal v State (NCT of Delhi), Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v State of Punjab Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 Anticipatory Bail and Bail |
topic |
Sushila Aggarwal v State (NCT of Delhi), Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v State of Punjab Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 Anticipatory Bail and Bail |
description |
Sushila Aggarwal v State (NCT of Delhi) forms an important part of the law on anticipatory Bail in India. Prior to Sushila Aggarwal judgment, the law on anticipatory bail in India was ambiguous due to the varying interpretations of section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 (anticipatory bail) by the Supreme Court. It was only in the year 2020 that the law on the matter was settled by the Supreme Court in its Sushila Aggarwal judgment. With this paper, the authors aim to trace the evolution of the law on anticipatory bail in India. It focusses on the landmark judgments of the Supreme Court and meanders its way through conflicting opinions of the Court. The paper concludes by welcoming the Sushila Aggarwal judgment for settling the long ambiguous law on anticipatory bail in India. However, it also highlights the concerns that Constitution Bench failed to appreciate, which if addressed would have made the law free of the loopholes presently plaguing the law on anticipatory bail. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-03T10:04:13Z 2021-05-01T00:00:00Z 2021-05 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11144/5040 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11144/5040 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1647-7251 https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.12.1.14 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
OBSERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
OBSERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136798490755072 |