The burden of Galileo's controversy: The Jesuit revisiting of the Aristotelian cosmos in Collegio Romano (1618-1677)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carolino, L. M.
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29700
Resumo: When studying the controversy prevailing between Galileo and the Jesuits over the comets of 1618, historians tend to focus primarily on the works that led to the publication of Il Saggia- tore in 1623. This article demonstrates that the echoes of this controversy reverberated inside the walls of the Collegio Romano well beyond the publication of Galileo’s chef-d’oeuvre. Its philosophy and mathematics professors strove to maintain – in opposition to Galileo – the Aristotelian principle that the heavens were ontologically superior to the terrestrial region throughout decades. Even after adhering to the planetary system of Tycho Brahe and the con- cept of celestial fluidity, they persisted in arguing that no corruption ever took place in the celestial region. Hence, accepting Tycho’s astronomical theories meant the seventeenth-cen- tury Collegio Romano professors had to reject the Ptolemaic astronomical framework even if not necessarily denying the very core of the Aristotelian cosmology. Thus, Collegio Romano remained the champion of philosophical orthodoxy within the Jesuit educational network.
id RCAP_71c025657507ac44e22a22abfc9ca783
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/29700
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The burden of Galileo's controversy: The Jesuit revisiting of the Aristotelian cosmos in Collegio Romano (1618-1677)Collegio RomanoGalileo GalileiOrazio GrassiCometsCelestial incorruptibilityWhen studying the controversy prevailing between Galileo and the Jesuits over the comets of 1618, historians tend to focus primarily on the works that led to the publication of Il Saggia- tore in 1623. This article demonstrates that the echoes of this controversy reverberated inside the walls of the Collegio Romano well beyond the publication of Galileo’s chef-d’oeuvre. Its philosophy and mathematics professors strove to maintain – in opposition to Galileo – the Aristotelian principle that the heavens were ontologically superior to the terrestrial region throughout decades. Even after adhering to the planetary system of Tycho Brahe and the con- cept of celestial fluidity, they persisted in arguing that no corruption ever took place in the celestial region. Hence, accepting Tycho’s astronomical theories meant the seventeenth-cen- tury Collegio Romano professors had to reject the Ptolemaic astronomical framework even if not necessarily denying the very core of the Aristotelian cosmology. Thus, Collegio Romano remained the champion of philosophical orthodoxy within the Jesuit educational network.Casa Editrice Leo S. Olschki2023-11-21T15:59:25Z2023-01-01T00:00:00Z20232023-11-21T15:58:09Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/29700eng1971-605210.57617/gal-14Carolino, L. M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-26T01:17:44Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/29700Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:19:45.084078Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The burden of Galileo's controversy: The Jesuit revisiting of the Aristotelian cosmos in Collegio Romano (1618-1677)
title The burden of Galileo's controversy: The Jesuit revisiting of the Aristotelian cosmos in Collegio Romano (1618-1677)
spellingShingle The burden of Galileo's controversy: The Jesuit revisiting of the Aristotelian cosmos in Collegio Romano (1618-1677)
Carolino, L. M.
Collegio Romano
Galileo Galilei
Orazio Grassi
Comets
Celestial incorruptibility
title_short The burden of Galileo's controversy: The Jesuit revisiting of the Aristotelian cosmos in Collegio Romano (1618-1677)
title_full The burden of Galileo's controversy: The Jesuit revisiting of the Aristotelian cosmos in Collegio Romano (1618-1677)
title_fullStr The burden of Galileo's controversy: The Jesuit revisiting of the Aristotelian cosmos in Collegio Romano (1618-1677)
title_full_unstemmed The burden of Galileo's controversy: The Jesuit revisiting of the Aristotelian cosmos in Collegio Romano (1618-1677)
title_sort The burden of Galileo's controversy: The Jesuit revisiting of the Aristotelian cosmos in Collegio Romano (1618-1677)
author Carolino, L. M.
author_facet Carolino, L. M.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carolino, L. M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Collegio Romano
Galileo Galilei
Orazio Grassi
Comets
Celestial incorruptibility
topic Collegio Romano
Galileo Galilei
Orazio Grassi
Comets
Celestial incorruptibility
description When studying the controversy prevailing between Galileo and the Jesuits over the comets of 1618, historians tend to focus primarily on the works that led to the publication of Il Saggia- tore in 1623. This article demonstrates that the echoes of this controversy reverberated inside the walls of the Collegio Romano well beyond the publication of Galileo’s chef-d’oeuvre. Its philosophy and mathematics professors strove to maintain – in opposition to Galileo – the Aristotelian principle that the heavens were ontologically superior to the terrestrial region throughout decades. Even after adhering to the planetary system of Tycho Brahe and the con- cept of celestial fluidity, they persisted in arguing that no corruption ever took place in the celestial region. Hence, accepting Tycho’s astronomical theories meant the seventeenth-cen- tury Collegio Romano professors had to reject the Ptolemaic astronomical framework even if not necessarily denying the very core of the Aristotelian cosmology. Thus, Collegio Romano remained the champion of philosophical orthodoxy within the Jesuit educational network.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-21T15:59:25Z
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
2023
2023-11-21T15:58:09Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29700
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29700
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1971-6052
10.57617/gal-14
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Casa Editrice Leo S. Olschki
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Casa Editrice Leo S. Olschki
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135496289386496