Institutional reform in Portugal: from the perspective of deputies and voters perspectives
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-11647 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/14164 |
Resumo: | Electoral system reform is a long debated topic in Portugal, especially since 1997. However, although several proposals to change from a List RP system to a Mixed Member Proportional system were presented and discussed by the major parties, namely in Parliament, and the Constitution was even changed to allow it, in the end the reform never passed. After a very brief historical overview of the proposals to reform the electoral system in Portugal since shortly after the democratic transition (1974) until 2008, the paper focus on both the levels of elite cohesion within and across parties, and on the levels of elite-mass congruence (or lack of it) around the topics of institutional reform, with a greater emphasis on electoral system reform, and tries to understand in what way the levels of elite cohesion and elite-mass congruence can help us to explain why there were no changes in the electoral system, in spite of the several proposals that were discussed since 1997. |
id |
RCAP_74c867dceb525e8b141e57ae1a65494b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/14164 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Institutional reform in Portugal: from the perspective of deputies and voters perspectivesElectoral systemInstitutional reformPolitical representationPortugalElectoral system reform is a long debated topic in Portugal, especially since 1997. However, although several proposals to change from a List RP system to a Mixed Member Proportional system were presented and discussed by the major parties, namely in Parliament, and the Constitution was even changed to allow it, in the end the reform never passed. After a very brief historical overview of the proposals to reform the electoral system in Portugal since shortly after the democratic transition (1974) until 2008, the paper focus on both the levels of elite cohesion within and across parties, and on the levels of elite-mass congruence (or lack of it) around the topics of institutional reform, with a greater emphasis on electoral system reform, and tries to understand in what way the levels of elite cohesion and elite-mass congruence can help us to explain why there were no changes in the electoral system, in spite of the several proposals that were discussed since 1997.ARPoS2017-07-27T10:36:44Z2012-01-01T00:00:00Z20122017-07-27T10:35:49Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-11647http://hdl.handle.net/10071/14164eng97829180361421262-1676Freire, A.Meirinho, M.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:56:23Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/14164Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:28:53.763254Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Institutional reform in Portugal: from the perspective of deputies and voters perspectives |
title |
Institutional reform in Portugal: from the perspective of deputies and voters perspectives |
spellingShingle |
Institutional reform in Portugal: from the perspective of deputies and voters perspectives Freire, A. Electoral system Institutional reform Political representation Portugal |
title_short |
Institutional reform in Portugal: from the perspective of deputies and voters perspectives |
title_full |
Institutional reform in Portugal: from the perspective of deputies and voters perspectives |
title_fullStr |
Institutional reform in Portugal: from the perspective of deputies and voters perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed |
Institutional reform in Portugal: from the perspective of deputies and voters perspectives |
title_sort |
Institutional reform in Portugal: from the perspective of deputies and voters perspectives |
author |
Freire, A. |
author_facet |
Freire, A. Meirinho, M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Meirinho, M. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Freire, A. Meirinho, M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Electoral system Institutional reform Political representation Portugal |
topic |
Electoral system Institutional reform Political representation Portugal |
description |
Electoral system reform is a long debated topic in Portugal, especially since 1997. However, although several proposals to change from a List RP system to a Mixed Member Proportional system were presented and discussed by the major parties, namely in Parliament, and the Constitution was even changed to allow it, in the end the reform never passed. After a very brief historical overview of the proposals to reform the electoral system in Portugal since shortly after the democratic transition (1974) until 2008, the paper focus on both the levels of elite cohesion within and across parties, and on the levels of elite-mass congruence (or lack of it) around the topics of institutional reform, with a greater emphasis on electoral system reform, and tries to understand in what way the levels of elite cohesion and elite-mass congruence can help us to explain why there were no changes in the electoral system, in spite of the several proposals that were discussed since 1997. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z 2012 2017-07-27T10:36:44Z 2017-07-27T10:35:49Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-11647 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/14164 |
url |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-11647 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/14164 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
9782918036142 1262-1676 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ARPoS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ARPoS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134851313434624 |