Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cabral, Pedro
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Campos, Felipe S., David, João, Caser, Ursula
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/115823
Resumo: Cabral, P., Campos, F. S., David, J., & Caser, U. (2021). Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover. Ecological Indicators, 126, 1-10. [107660]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107660
id RCAP_74cd1d52bd0fd201a7c5aaef1444c1a1
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/115823
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholdersAn integrative assessment based on land coverCORINE land coverLand cover changeMulti-criteria decision analysisNatural capitalPortugalStakeholder participationDecision Sciences(all)Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsEcologySDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingSDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and CommunitiesSDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic GrowthSDG 15 - Life on LandCabral, P., Campos, F. S., David, J., & Caser, U. (2021). Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover. Ecological Indicators, 126, 1-10. [107660]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107660Understanding where ecosystem services (ES) are and quantifying their supply using stakeholderś information is key for effective sustainable management. This paper describes a participatory methodology for extracting stakeholders’ ES perception for continental Portugal based on land cover using analytical hierarchy process (AHP), matrix-based approach with data visualization techniques, and scenario analysis. Results show that drought regulation was the most valued ES by stakeholders and recreation was considered the least important. Results also show that the “Agricultural areas and “Forests and semi-natural areas” land cover classes provide about two-thirds of the total ES for the country. An “Economic development” scenario will yield negative values for all ES except recreation and food supply, whereas an “Environmental development” scenario will increase all ES, except food supply. Finally, a “Sustainable development” scenario, presents values between the previous two scenarios and is the best for food supply. This operational methodology for extracting information from stakeholders and to report information on the mapping and assessment of ES can be helpful for sustainable planning in Portugal and elsewhere.Information Management Research Center (MagIC) - NOVA Information Management SchoolNOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS)RUNCabral, PedroCampos, Felipe S.David, JoãoCaser, Ursula2021-04-19T22:43:33Z2021-07-012021-07-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article10application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/115823eng1470-160XPURE: 29275981https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107660info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:58:19Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/115823Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:42:51.075416Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders
An integrative assessment based on land cover
title Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders
spellingShingle Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders
Cabral, Pedro
CORINE land cover
Land cover change
Multi-criteria decision analysis
Natural capital
Portugal
Stakeholder participation
Decision Sciences(all)
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Ecology
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 15 - Life on Land
title_short Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders
title_full Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders
title_fullStr Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders
title_sort Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders
author Cabral, Pedro
author_facet Cabral, Pedro
Campos, Felipe S.
David, João
Caser, Ursula
author_role author
author2 Campos, Felipe S.
David, João
Caser, Ursula
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Information Management Research Center (MagIC) - NOVA Information Management School
NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cabral, Pedro
Campos, Felipe S.
David, João
Caser, Ursula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CORINE land cover
Land cover change
Multi-criteria decision analysis
Natural capital
Portugal
Stakeholder participation
Decision Sciences(all)
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Ecology
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 15 - Life on Land
topic CORINE land cover
Land cover change
Multi-criteria decision analysis
Natural capital
Portugal
Stakeholder participation
Decision Sciences(all)
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Ecology
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 15 - Life on Land
description Cabral, P., Campos, F. S., David, J., & Caser, U. (2021). Disentangling ecosystem services perception by stakeholders: An integrative assessment based on land cover. Ecological Indicators, 126, 1-10. [107660]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107660
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-19T22:43:33Z
2021-07-01
2021-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/115823
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/115823
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1470-160X
PURE: 29275981
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107660
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 10
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138039747837952

Registros relacionados