Reoperations on cardiac valves

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Antunes, MJ
Data de Publicação: 1992
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/797
Resumo: As the number of patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement has grown, valve reoperations have become increasingly frequent. The newer generations of mechanical valves are far more efficient and freer from structural failure than the older ones. However, other valve and non-valve related complications still constitute a major cause of morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, bioprostheses, implanted in large numbers in the 1970's and early 1980's, have now gone into the second decade of life since implantation, when biodegradation becomes more frequent. Reoperations are technically more demanding than the original valve procedures because of the mediastinal and pericardial adhesions and the condition of the anulus after removal of the previous prosthesis. Greater awareness of the most dangerous steps and refinements to surgical technique have contributed to the decreased mortality observed in recent years. The risk is higher in certain conditions, such as the presence of prosthetic valve endocarditis and the patient being operated on an emergency basis in NYHA functional class IV. It may also be increased in females and the elderly. Multiple reoperations also carry a higher risk in most surgeon's experience. However, elective reoperations for defective mechanical valves and for replacement of a previously repaired mitral valve carry similar mortality rates to primary valve replacement procedures. The global mortality rates have not been significantly higher in the hands of experienced surgeons working in centers where reoperations are performed frequently. In smaller series high mortality rates are a constant, which underscores the importance of the learning curve. The indications for reoperation must therefore consider all risk factors and, when possible, the procedure must be performed by those who have the most experience. Under these circumstances, elective re-replacement of degenerating bioprostheses and of defective mechanical valves in asymptomatic patients may be advisable.
id RCAP_7524bf3c52b72fbc9d317953738325a6
oai_identifier_str oai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/797
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Reoperations on cardiac valvesBioprótesesPróteses Válvulas CardíacasAs the number of patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement has grown, valve reoperations have become increasingly frequent. The newer generations of mechanical valves are far more efficient and freer from structural failure than the older ones. However, other valve and non-valve related complications still constitute a major cause of morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, bioprostheses, implanted in large numbers in the 1970's and early 1980's, have now gone into the second decade of life since implantation, when biodegradation becomes more frequent. Reoperations are technically more demanding than the original valve procedures because of the mediastinal and pericardial adhesions and the condition of the anulus after removal of the previous prosthesis. Greater awareness of the most dangerous steps and refinements to surgical technique have contributed to the decreased mortality observed in recent years. The risk is higher in certain conditions, such as the presence of prosthetic valve endocarditis and the patient being operated on an emergency basis in NYHA functional class IV. It may also be increased in females and the elderly. Multiple reoperations also carry a higher risk in most surgeon's experience. However, elective reoperations for defective mechanical valves and for replacement of a previously repaired mitral valve carry similar mortality rates to primary valve replacement procedures. The global mortality rates have not been significantly higher in the hands of experienced surgeons working in centers where reoperations are performed frequently. In smaller series high mortality rates are a constant, which underscores the importance of the learning curve. The indications for reoperation must therefore consider all risk factors and, when possible, the procedure must be performed by those who have the most experience. Under these circumstances, elective re-replacement of degenerating bioprostheses and of defective mechanical valves in asymptomatic patients may be advisable.RIHUCAntunes, MJ2010-06-24T13:50:32Z19921992-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/797engJ Heart Valve Dis. 1992 Sep;1(1):15-28.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-11T14:21:59Zoai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/797Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:03:20.883189Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reoperations on cardiac valves
title Reoperations on cardiac valves
spellingShingle Reoperations on cardiac valves
Antunes, MJ
Biopróteses
Próteses Válvulas Cardíacas
title_short Reoperations on cardiac valves
title_full Reoperations on cardiac valves
title_fullStr Reoperations on cardiac valves
title_full_unstemmed Reoperations on cardiac valves
title_sort Reoperations on cardiac valves
author Antunes, MJ
author_facet Antunes, MJ
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv RIHUC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Antunes, MJ
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biopróteses
Próteses Válvulas Cardíacas
topic Biopróteses
Próteses Válvulas Cardíacas
description As the number of patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement has grown, valve reoperations have become increasingly frequent. The newer generations of mechanical valves are far more efficient and freer from structural failure than the older ones. However, other valve and non-valve related complications still constitute a major cause of morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, bioprostheses, implanted in large numbers in the 1970's and early 1980's, have now gone into the second decade of life since implantation, when biodegradation becomes more frequent. Reoperations are technically more demanding than the original valve procedures because of the mediastinal and pericardial adhesions and the condition of the anulus after removal of the previous prosthesis. Greater awareness of the most dangerous steps and refinements to surgical technique have contributed to the decreased mortality observed in recent years. The risk is higher in certain conditions, such as the presence of prosthetic valve endocarditis and the patient being operated on an emergency basis in NYHA functional class IV. It may also be increased in females and the elderly. Multiple reoperations also carry a higher risk in most surgeon's experience. However, elective reoperations for defective mechanical valves and for replacement of a previously repaired mitral valve carry similar mortality rates to primary valve replacement procedures. The global mortality rates have not been significantly higher in the hands of experienced surgeons working in centers where reoperations are performed frequently. In smaller series high mortality rates are a constant, which underscores the importance of the learning curve. The indications for reoperation must therefore consider all risk factors and, when possible, the procedure must be performed by those who have the most experience. Under these circumstances, elective re-replacement of degenerating bioprostheses and of defective mechanical valves in asymptomatic patients may be advisable.
publishDate 1992
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1992
1992-01-01T00:00:00Z
2010-06-24T13:50:32Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/797
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/797
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv J Heart Valve Dis. 1992 Sep;1(1):15-28.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131697580605440