Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Herdeiro, Maria Teresa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/31047
Resumo: The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?
id RCAP_755bf2875c9f63006bc4c1fe9d689549
oai_identifier_str oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/31047
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewersPeer reviewResearchOpen Access publishingPeriodicals as topicThe peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas2021-03-26T11:55:05Z2018-01-01T00:00:00Z2018info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/31047eng1886-365510.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236Fernandez-Llimos, FernandoHerdeiro, Maria Teresainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T11:59:56Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/31047Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:03:01.024739Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
title Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
spellingShingle Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Peer review
Research
Open Access publishing
Periodicals as topic
title_short Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
title_full Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
title_fullStr Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
title_full_unstemmed Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
title_sort Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
author Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
author_facet Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Herdeiro, Maria Teresa
author_role author
author2 Herdeiro, Maria Teresa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Herdeiro, Maria Teresa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Peer review
Research
Open Access publishing
Periodicals as topic
topic Peer review
Research
Open Access publishing
Periodicals as topic
description The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018
2021-03-26T11:55:05Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10773/31047
url http://hdl.handle.net/10773/31047
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1886-3655
10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137685674131456

Registros relacionados