THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melidoro, Domenico
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.200
Resumo: Like any book, and regardless of the degree to which it achieves its goals, Dealing with Diversity has inaccuracies and argumentative weaknesses. The careful comments received from Asha Bhandary, Stephen Macedo, and João Cardoso Rosas highlight them lucidly. In what follows, I aim to address some of the points they raise as fairly as I can and, where it is possible, to defend the work I did in my book. At the same time, the reply to such keen remarks gives me the opportunity to clarify some parts that might seem opaque. Before proceeding to consider in some detail the criticisms received, I think it is appropriate to set forth very briefly the purposes of the book.
id RCAP_76255f4d4db1ac95f73558261ddf0b7b
oai_identifier_str oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/5335
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONSSYMPOSIUM: HAYEK-POLANYILike any book, and regardless of the degree to which it achieves its goals, Dealing with Diversity has inaccuracies and argumentative weaknesses. The careful comments received from Asha Bhandary, Stephen Macedo, and João Cardoso Rosas highlight them lucidly. In what follows, I aim to address some of the points they raise as fairly as I can and, where it is possible, to defend the work I did in my book. At the same time, the reply to such keen remarks gives me the opportunity to clarify some parts that might seem opaque. Before proceeding to consider in some detail the criticisms received, I think it is appropriate to set forth very briefly the purposes of the book.Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho2023-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.200eng2184-25822184-2574Melidoro, Domenicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-29T10:56:47Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/5335Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:58:43.548737Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS
title THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS
spellingShingle THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS
Melidoro, Domenico
SYMPOSIUM: HAYEK-POLANYI
title_short THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS
title_full THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS
title_fullStr THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS
title_full_unstemmed THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS
title_sort THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS
author Melidoro, Domenico
author_facet Melidoro, Domenico
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melidoro, Domenico
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv SYMPOSIUM: HAYEK-POLANYI
topic SYMPOSIUM: HAYEK-POLANYI
description Like any book, and regardless of the degree to which it achieves its goals, Dealing with Diversity has inaccuracies and argumentative weaknesses. The careful comments received from Asha Bhandary, Stephen Macedo, and João Cardoso Rosas highlight them lucidly. In what follows, I aim to address some of the points they raise as fairly as I can and, where it is possible, to defend the work I did in my book. At the same time, the reply to such keen remarks gives me the opportunity to clarify some parts that might seem opaque. Before proceeding to consider in some detail the criticisms received, I think it is appropriate to set forth very briefly the purposes of the book.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.200
url https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2184-2582
2184-2574
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137071736029184