THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.200 |
Resumo: | Like any book, and regardless of the degree to which it achieves its goals, Dealing with Diversity has inaccuracies and argumentative weaknesses. The careful comments received from Asha Bhandary, Stephen Macedo, and João Cardoso Rosas highlight them lucidly. In what follows, I aim to address some of the points they raise as fairly as I can and, where it is possible, to defend the work I did in my book. At the same time, the reply to such keen remarks gives me the opportunity to clarify some parts that might seem opaque. Before proceeding to consider in some detail the criticisms received, I think it is appropriate to set forth very briefly the purposes of the book. |
id |
RCAP_76255f4d4db1ac95f73558261ddf0b7b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/5335 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONSSYMPOSIUM: HAYEK-POLANYILike any book, and regardless of the degree to which it achieves its goals, Dealing with Diversity has inaccuracies and argumentative weaknesses. The careful comments received from Asha Bhandary, Stephen Macedo, and João Cardoso Rosas highlight them lucidly. In what follows, I aim to address some of the points they raise as fairly as I can and, where it is possible, to defend the work I did in my book. At the same time, the reply to such keen remarks gives me the opportunity to clarify some parts that might seem opaque. Before proceeding to consider in some detail the criticisms received, I think it is appropriate to set forth very briefly the purposes of the book.Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho2023-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.200eng2184-25822184-2574Melidoro, Domenicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-29T10:56:47Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/5335Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:58:43.548737Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS |
title |
THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS |
spellingShingle |
THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS Melidoro, Domenico SYMPOSIUM: HAYEK-POLANYI |
title_short |
THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS |
title_full |
THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS |
title_fullStr |
THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS |
title_sort |
THE LIBERALISM OF DIVERSITY: A DEFENSE AND SOME CLARIFICATIONS |
author |
Melidoro, Domenico |
author_facet |
Melidoro, Domenico |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melidoro, Domenico |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
SYMPOSIUM: HAYEK-POLANYI |
topic |
SYMPOSIUM: HAYEK-POLANYI |
description |
Like any book, and regardless of the degree to which it achieves its goals, Dealing with Diversity has inaccuracies and argumentative weaknesses. The careful comments received from Asha Bhandary, Stephen Macedo, and João Cardoso Rosas highlight them lucidly. In what follows, I aim to address some of the points they raise as fairly as I can and, where it is possible, to defend the work I did in my book. At the same time, the reply to such keen remarks gives me the opportunity to clarify some parts that might seem opaque. Before proceeding to consider in some detail the criticisms received, I think it is appropriate to set forth very briefly the purposes of the book. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.200 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.21814/eps.4.1.200 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2184-2582 2184-2574 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society - ELACH, University of Minho |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137071736029184 |