Prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and restorations in teeth adjacent to implant- or toothsupported crowns
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/50876 |
Resumo: | Aim: To describe the prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and coronal restorations on teeth adjacent to either implant- or natural tooth-supported crowns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) assessment compared to nonadjacent teeth. Methodology: A total of 1249 CBCT volumes were screened by five pre-calibrated observers in 11 health centres. A step-by-step screening protocol was implemented and reviewed every 3 months, and mandatory setting characteristics were established for all CBCT scans using dedicated visualization software. Intra- and inter-rater reliability tests were conducted. The prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and coronalrestorations wasrecorded on both teeth adjacent and nonadjacent to implant- (predictor 1) or natural tooth-supported crowns (predictor 2). A binary logistic model (Generalizing Estimating Equations test) was used to verify whether the prevalence of periapical lesion, root canal filling and the tooth restorative status are altered when the assessed tooth is adjacent or not to an implant-supported crown (predictor 1); or to a natural tooth-supported crown (predictor 2). Odds ratio and confidence intervals for the dependent variables at both predictors were obtained. The significance level was set at .05. Results: A global sample of 22 899 teeth was included. Compared to nonadjacent teeth, the prevalence of periapical lesion, root canals treatments and restorative procedures when adjacent to implant-supported crowns was 10.7%, 19.6% and 22.9% higher, respectively, and when adjacent to tooth-supported crowns was 19.3%, 35.6% and 37.4% higher respectively. These results were significant only for variables root canal filling and coronal restoration (p < .0001). Odds ratio to present root canal treatment is 2.57 times higher (CI 1.95–3.39, p = .0001) when the tooth is adjacent to implant-supported crown and 4.39 times (CI 3.49–5.53, p = .0001) when adjacent to tooth-supported crown, whilst for restorative procedure, the odds are, respectively, 1.63 (CI 1.29–2.06, p = .0001) and 2.30 (CI 1.92–2.76, p = .0001). |
id |
RCAP_76ce2caaee76f6ecd2b6350965a2b8ca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/50876 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and restorations in teeth adjacent to implant- or toothsupported crownsa multi-centre cross-sectional studyAim: To describe the prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and coronal restorations on teeth adjacent to either implant- or natural tooth-supported crowns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) assessment compared to nonadjacent teeth. Methodology: A total of 1249 CBCT volumes were screened by five pre-calibrated observers in 11 health centres. A step-by-step screening protocol was implemented and reviewed every 3 months, and mandatory setting characteristics were established for all CBCT scans using dedicated visualization software. Intra- and inter-rater reliability tests were conducted. The prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and coronalrestorations wasrecorded on both teeth adjacent and nonadjacent to implant- (predictor 1) or natural tooth-supported crowns (predictor 2). A binary logistic model (Generalizing Estimating Equations test) was used to verify whether the prevalence of periapical lesion, root canal filling and the tooth restorative status are altered when the assessed tooth is adjacent or not to an implant-supported crown (predictor 1); or to a natural tooth-supported crown (predictor 2). Odds ratio and confidence intervals for the dependent variables at both predictors were obtained. The significance level was set at .05. Results: A global sample of 22 899 teeth was included. Compared to nonadjacent teeth, the prevalence of periapical lesion, root canals treatments and restorative procedures when adjacent to implant-supported crowns was 10.7%, 19.6% and 22.9% higher, respectively, and when adjacent to tooth-supported crowns was 19.3%, 35.6% and 37.4% higher respectively. These results were significant only for variables root canal filling and coronal restoration (p < .0001). Odds ratio to present root canal treatment is 2.57 times higher (CI 1.95–3.39, p = .0001) when the tooth is adjacent to implant-supported crown and 4.39 times (CI 3.49–5.53, p = .0001) when adjacent to tooth-supported crown, whilst for restorative procedure, the odds are, respectively, 1.63 (CI 1.29–2.06, p = .0001) and 2.30 (CI 1.92–2.76, p = .0001).Repositório da Universidade de LisboaBaruwa, Abayomi O.Martins, Jorge N. R.Ginjeira, António2022-01-18T15:02:22Z20222022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/50876engBaruwa A, Martins JNR, Pereira B, Meirinhos J, Ordinola-Zapata R, Souza EM, Ginjeira A. Prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and restorations in teeth adjacent to implant- or tooth-supported crowns: a multi-centre cross sectional study. Int Endod J 2022;55:30–37.metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-08T16:55:15Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/50876Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:02:14.426253Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and restorations in teeth adjacent to implant- or toothsupported crowns a multi-centre cross-sectional study |
title |
Prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and restorations in teeth adjacent to implant- or toothsupported crowns |
spellingShingle |
Prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and restorations in teeth adjacent to implant- or toothsupported crowns Baruwa, Abayomi O. |
title_short |
Prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and restorations in teeth adjacent to implant- or toothsupported crowns |
title_full |
Prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and restorations in teeth adjacent to implant- or toothsupported crowns |
title_fullStr |
Prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and restorations in teeth adjacent to implant- or toothsupported crowns |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and restorations in teeth adjacent to implant- or toothsupported crowns |
title_sort |
Prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and restorations in teeth adjacent to implant- or toothsupported crowns |
author |
Baruwa, Abayomi O. |
author_facet |
Baruwa, Abayomi O. Martins, Jorge N. R. Ginjeira, António |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins, Jorge N. R. Ginjeira, António |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Baruwa, Abayomi O. Martins, Jorge N. R. Ginjeira, António |
description |
Aim: To describe the prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and coronal restorations on teeth adjacent to either implant- or natural tooth-supported crowns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) assessment compared to nonadjacent teeth. Methodology: A total of 1249 CBCT volumes were screened by five pre-calibrated observers in 11 health centres. A step-by-step screening protocol was implemented and reviewed every 3 months, and mandatory setting characteristics were established for all CBCT scans using dedicated visualization software. Intra- and inter-rater reliability tests were conducted. The prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and coronalrestorations wasrecorded on both teeth adjacent and nonadjacent to implant- (predictor 1) or natural tooth-supported crowns (predictor 2). A binary logistic model (Generalizing Estimating Equations test) was used to verify whether the prevalence of periapical lesion, root canal filling and the tooth restorative status are altered when the assessed tooth is adjacent or not to an implant-supported crown (predictor 1); or to a natural tooth-supported crown (predictor 2). Odds ratio and confidence intervals for the dependent variables at both predictors were obtained. The significance level was set at .05. Results: A global sample of 22 899 teeth was included. Compared to nonadjacent teeth, the prevalence of periapical lesion, root canals treatments and restorative procedures when adjacent to implant-supported crowns was 10.7%, 19.6% and 22.9% higher, respectively, and when adjacent to tooth-supported crowns was 19.3%, 35.6% and 37.4% higher respectively. These results were significant only for variables root canal filling and coronal restoration (p < .0001). Odds ratio to present root canal treatment is 2.57 times higher (CI 1.95–3.39, p = .0001) when the tooth is adjacent to implant-supported crown and 4.39 times (CI 3.49–5.53, p = .0001) when adjacent to tooth-supported crown, whilst for restorative procedure, the odds are, respectively, 1.63 (CI 1.29–2.06, p = .0001) and 2.30 (CI 1.92–2.76, p = .0001). |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-18T15:02:22Z 2022 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/50876 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/50876 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Baruwa A, Martins JNR, Pereira B, Meirinhos J, Ordinola-Zapata R, Souza EM, Ginjeira A. Prevalence of periapical lesions, root canal treatments and restorations in teeth adjacent to implant- or tooth-supported crowns: a multi-centre cross sectional study. Int Endod J 2022;55:30–37. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
metadata only access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
metadata only access |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134572461424640 |