Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Raube, Kolja
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Vega Rubio, Raquel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i2.5022
Resumo: In light of the larger contextual picture of increased geostrategic rivalry with China, this article focuses on the question whether transatlantic cooperation responses towards the geostrategic challenge of China can possibly be coherent at all. How can we explain coherent actions (or lack thereof) between actors across the Atlantic in their foreign policy towards China? The central idea then is to explain transatlantic cooperation responses to the geostrategic challenge of China from a coherence angle, providing us with a perspective by which we can understand why actors on both sides of the Atlantic invest in policy coherence, or rather not. We argue that this coherence angle on transatlantic relations is particularly promising as it combines a focus on actors and structural dimensions that is able to offer explanations by whom, where, and why policy coherence is achieved. By looking into two different cases, the so-called concerted sanctions case and the AUKUS case, we find both, transatlantic coherence and incoherence, respectively, in response to the strategic challenge of China. Overall, this article has important policy implications, as it can point to the underlying factors in transatlantic policy-making that push or obstruct coherence.
id RCAP_77155e87cba1bb94c67d0e339919b921
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5022
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of Chinacoherence; cooperation; EU; incoherence; security; transatlantic; US; valuesIn light of the larger contextual picture of increased geostrategic rivalry with China, this article focuses on the question whether transatlantic cooperation responses towards the geostrategic challenge of China can possibly be coherent at all. How can we explain coherent actions (or lack thereof) between actors across the Atlantic in their foreign policy towards China? The central idea then is to explain transatlantic cooperation responses to the geostrategic challenge of China from a coherence angle, providing us with a perspective by which we can understand why actors on both sides of the Atlantic invest in policy coherence, or rather not. We argue that this coherence angle on transatlantic relations is particularly promising as it combines a focus on actors and structural dimensions that is able to offer explanations by whom, where, and why policy coherence is achieved. By looking into two different cases, the so-called concerted sanctions case and the AUKUS case, we find both, transatlantic coherence and incoherence, respectively, in response to the strategic challenge of China. Overall, this article has important policy implications, as it can point to the underlying factors in transatlantic policy-making that push or obstruct coherence.Cogitatio2022-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i2.5022oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5022Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Out With the Old, In With the New? Explaining Changing EU–US Relations; 176-1852183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5022https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i2.5022https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5022/5022Copyright (c) 2022 Kolja Raube, Raquel Vega Rubioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRaube, KoljaVega Rubio, Raquel2022-12-22T15:16:46Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5022Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:27.914575Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China
title Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China
spellingShingle Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China
Raube, Kolja
coherence; cooperation; EU; incoherence; security; transatlantic; US; values
title_short Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China
title_full Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China
title_fullStr Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China
title_full_unstemmed Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China
title_sort Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China
author Raube, Kolja
author_facet Raube, Kolja
Vega Rubio, Raquel
author_role author
author2 Vega Rubio, Raquel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Raube, Kolja
Vega Rubio, Raquel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv coherence; cooperation; EU; incoherence; security; transatlantic; US; values
topic coherence; cooperation; EU; incoherence; security; transatlantic; US; values
description In light of the larger contextual picture of increased geostrategic rivalry with China, this article focuses on the question whether transatlantic cooperation responses towards the geostrategic challenge of China can possibly be coherent at all. How can we explain coherent actions (or lack thereof) between actors across the Atlantic in their foreign policy towards China? The central idea then is to explain transatlantic cooperation responses to the geostrategic challenge of China from a coherence angle, providing us with a perspective by which we can understand why actors on both sides of the Atlantic invest in policy coherence, or rather not. We argue that this coherence angle on transatlantic relations is particularly promising as it combines a focus on actors and structural dimensions that is able to offer explanations by whom, where, and why policy coherence is achieved. By looking into two different cases, the so-called concerted sanctions case and the AUKUS case, we find both, transatlantic coherence and incoherence, respectively, in response to the strategic challenge of China. Overall, this article has important policy implications, as it can point to the underlying factors in transatlantic policy-making that push or obstruct coherence.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-18
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i2.5022
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5022
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i2.5022
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5022
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5022
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i2.5022
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5022/5022
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Kolja Raube, Raquel Vega Rubio
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Kolja Raube, Raquel Vega Rubio
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Out With the Old, In With the New? Explaining Changing EU–US Relations; 176-185
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130670328446976