Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i2.5022 |
Resumo: | In light of the larger contextual picture of increased geostrategic rivalry with China, this article focuses on the question whether transatlantic cooperation responses towards the geostrategic challenge of China can possibly be coherent at all. How can we explain coherent actions (or lack thereof) between actors across the Atlantic in their foreign policy towards China? The central idea then is to explain transatlantic cooperation responses to the geostrategic challenge of China from a coherence angle, providing us with a perspective by which we can understand why actors on both sides of the Atlantic invest in policy coherence, or rather not. We argue that this coherence angle on transatlantic relations is particularly promising as it combines a focus on actors and structural dimensions that is able to offer explanations by whom, where, and why policy coherence is achieved. By looking into two different cases, the so-called concerted sanctions case and the AUKUS case, we find both, transatlantic coherence and incoherence, respectively, in response to the strategic challenge of China. Overall, this article has important policy implications, as it can point to the underlying factors in transatlantic policy-making that push or obstruct coherence. |
id |
RCAP_77155e87cba1bb94c67d0e339919b921 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5022 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of Chinacoherence; cooperation; EU; incoherence; security; transatlantic; US; valuesIn light of the larger contextual picture of increased geostrategic rivalry with China, this article focuses on the question whether transatlantic cooperation responses towards the geostrategic challenge of China can possibly be coherent at all. How can we explain coherent actions (or lack thereof) between actors across the Atlantic in their foreign policy towards China? The central idea then is to explain transatlantic cooperation responses to the geostrategic challenge of China from a coherence angle, providing us with a perspective by which we can understand why actors on both sides of the Atlantic invest in policy coherence, or rather not. We argue that this coherence angle on transatlantic relations is particularly promising as it combines a focus on actors and structural dimensions that is able to offer explanations by whom, where, and why policy coherence is achieved. By looking into two different cases, the so-called concerted sanctions case and the AUKUS case, we find both, transatlantic coherence and incoherence, respectively, in response to the strategic challenge of China. Overall, this article has important policy implications, as it can point to the underlying factors in transatlantic policy-making that push or obstruct coherence.Cogitatio2022-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i2.5022oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5022Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Out With the Old, In With the New? Explaining Changing EU–US Relations; 176-1852183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5022https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i2.5022https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5022/5022Copyright (c) 2022 Kolja Raube, Raquel Vega Rubioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRaube, KoljaVega Rubio, Raquel2022-12-22T15:16:46Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5022Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:27.914575Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China |
title |
Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China |
spellingShingle |
Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China Raube, Kolja coherence; cooperation; EU; incoherence; security; transatlantic; US; values |
title_short |
Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China |
title_full |
Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China |
title_fullStr |
Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China |
title_full_unstemmed |
Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China |
title_sort |
Coherence at Last? Transatlantic Cooperation in Response to the Geostrategic Challenge of China |
author |
Raube, Kolja |
author_facet |
Raube, Kolja Vega Rubio, Raquel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vega Rubio, Raquel |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Raube, Kolja Vega Rubio, Raquel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
coherence; cooperation; EU; incoherence; security; transatlantic; US; values |
topic |
coherence; cooperation; EU; incoherence; security; transatlantic; US; values |
description |
In light of the larger contextual picture of increased geostrategic rivalry with China, this article focuses on the question whether transatlantic cooperation responses towards the geostrategic challenge of China can possibly be coherent at all. How can we explain coherent actions (or lack thereof) between actors across the Atlantic in their foreign policy towards China? The central idea then is to explain transatlantic cooperation responses to the geostrategic challenge of China from a coherence angle, providing us with a perspective by which we can understand why actors on both sides of the Atlantic invest in policy coherence, or rather not. We argue that this coherence angle on transatlantic relations is particularly promising as it combines a focus on actors and structural dimensions that is able to offer explanations by whom, where, and why policy coherence is achieved. By looking into two different cases, the so-called concerted sanctions case and the AUKUS case, we find both, transatlantic coherence and incoherence, respectively, in response to the strategic challenge of China. Overall, this article has important policy implications, as it can point to the underlying factors in transatlantic policy-making that push or obstruct coherence. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-18 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i2.5022 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5022 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i2.5022 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5022 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i2.5022 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5022/5022 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Kolja Raube, Raquel Vega Rubio info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Kolja Raube, Raquel Vega Rubio |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Out With the Old, In With the New? Explaining Changing EU–US Relations; 176-185 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130670328446976 |