Comparación de los resultados de la medición del trabajo reproductivoen la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y la Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: La Parra, D.
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Masanet, E.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/2023
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10453
Resumo: Objective: To compare time spent on unpaid work as measured by the Time Use Survey (TUS) 2002-2003 and the National Health Survey (NHS) 2006. Methods: The time spent on childcare, care of dependent adults, and housework was studied. The proportion of caregivers and the average amount of time spent on each activity, as measured by both surveys, was compared by gender, age and household size. Results: The estimated time spent on adult and childcare is four to six times higher in the NHS, whereas the TUS shows higher percentages of people devoted to housework and childcare. The results of the NHS and the TUS tend to converge only when they measure the proportion of people caring for dependent adults and the average amount of time spent on housework.
id RCAP_77304cf8f2b034e33dc1c462f9874f0f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10453
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparación de los resultados de la medición del trabajo reproductivoen la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y la Encuesta de Empleo del TiempoCaregiversData collectionGenderHealth surveysQuestionnairesTimeCuidadoresTiempoGéneroRecolección de datosCuestionariosEncuestasObjective: To compare time spent on unpaid work as measured by the Time Use Survey (TUS) 2002-2003 and the National Health Survey (NHS) 2006. Methods: The time spent on childcare, care of dependent adults, and housework was studied. The proportion of caregivers and the average amount of time spent on each activity, as measured by both surveys, was compared by gender, age and household size. Results: The estimated time spent on adult and childcare is four to six times higher in the NHS, whereas the TUS shows higher percentages of people devoted to housework and childcare. The results of the NHS and the TUS tend to converge only when they measure the proportion of people caring for dependent adults and the average amount of time spent on housework.Elsevier2015-12-18T16:13:36Z2011-01-01T00:00:00Z20112015-12-18T16:11:07Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/2023http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10453spa0213-9111La Parra, D.Masanet, E.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-07-07T02:50:32Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10453Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-07-07T02:50:32Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparación de los resultados de la medición del trabajo reproductivoen la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y la Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo
title Comparación de los resultados de la medición del trabajo reproductivoen la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y la Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo
spellingShingle Comparación de los resultados de la medición del trabajo reproductivoen la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y la Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo
La Parra, D.
Caregivers
Data collection
Gender
Health surveys
Questionnaires
Time
Cuidadores
Tiempo
Género
Recolección de datos
Cuestionarios
Encuestas
title_short Comparación de los resultados de la medición del trabajo reproductivoen la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y la Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo
title_full Comparación de los resultados de la medición del trabajo reproductivoen la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y la Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo
title_fullStr Comparación de los resultados de la medición del trabajo reproductivoen la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y la Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo
title_full_unstemmed Comparación de los resultados de la medición del trabajo reproductivoen la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y la Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo
title_sort Comparación de los resultados de la medición del trabajo reproductivoen la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y la Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo
author La Parra, D.
author_facet La Parra, D.
Masanet, E.
author_role author
author2 Masanet, E.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv La Parra, D.
Masanet, E.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Caregivers
Data collection
Gender
Health surveys
Questionnaires
Time
Cuidadores
Tiempo
Género
Recolección de datos
Cuestionarios
Encuestas
topic Caregivers
Data collection
Gender
Health surveys
Questionnaires
Time
Cuidadores
Tiempo
Género
Recolección de datos
Cuestionarios
Encuestas
description Objective: To compare time spent on unpaid work as measured by the Time Use Survey (TUS) 2002-2003 and the National Health Survey (NHS) 2006. Methods: The time spent on childcare, care of dependent adults, and housework was studied. The proportion of caregivers and the average amount of time spent on each activity, as measured by both surveys, was compared by gender, age and household size. Results: The estimated time spent on adult and childcare is four to six times higher in the NHS, whereas the TUS shows higher percentages of people devoted to housework and childcare. The results of the NHS and the TUS tend to converge only when they measure the proportion of people caring for dependent adults and the average amount of time spent on housework.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
2011
2015-12-18T16:13:36Z
2015-12-18T16:11:07Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/2023
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10453
url https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/2023
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10453
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0213-9111
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817546336006832128