The relationships between reading fluency and different measures of holistic word processing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/63295 |
Resumo: | Recently, paradigms in the face recognition literature have been adopted to reveal holistic processing in word recognition. It is unknown, however, whether different measures of holistic word processing share similar underlying mechanisms, and whether fluent word reading relies on holistic word processing. We measured holistic processing effects in three paradigms (composite, configural sensitivity, part–whole) as well as in reading fluency (3DM task: reading aloud high- and low-frequency words and pseudowords). Bin scores were used to combine accuracy and response time variables in the quest for a more comprehensive, reliable, and valid measure of holistic processing. Weak correlations were found between the different holistic processing measures, with only a significant correlation between the configural sensitivity effect and part–whole effect (r = .32) and a trend of a positive correlation between the word composite effect and configural sensitivity effect (r = .21). Of the three holistic processing measures, only one (part–whole effect) correlated with a lexical access measure of 3DM (r = .23). We also performed a principal component analysis (PCA) of performance in the three lists of 3DM, with the second most probably reflecting lexical access processes. There was a tendency for a positive correlation between part–whole bin measure and Component 2 of PCA. We also found a positive correlation between composite aligned in accuracy and Component 2 of PCA. Our results show that different measures of holistic word processing reflect predominantly different mechanisms, and that differences among normal readers in word reading do not seem to depend highly on holistic processing. |
id |
RCAP_789490f3b94416f3c564835769897a0a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/63295 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The relationships between reading fluency and different measures of holistic word processingPerceptual expertiseIndividual differencesHolistic processingWord recognitionFace recognitionRecently, paradigms in the face recognition literature have been adopted to reveal holistic processing in word recognition. It is unknown, however, whether different measures of holistic word processing share similar underlying mechanisms, and whether fluent word reading relies on holistic word processing. We measured holistic processing effects in three paradigms (composite, configural sensitivity, part–whole) as well as in reading fluency (3DM task: reading aloud high- and low-frequency words and pseudowords). Bin scores were used to combine accuracy and response time variables in the quest for a more comprehensive, reliable, and valid measure of holistic processing. Weak correlations were found between the different holistic processing measures, with only a significant correlation between the configural sensitivity effect and part–whole effect (r = .32) and a trend of a positive correlation between the word composite effect and configural sensitivity effect (r = .21). Of the three holistic processing measures, only one (part–whole effect) correlated with a lexical access measure of 3DM (r = .23). We also performed a principal component analysis (PCA) of performance in the three lists of 3DM, with the second most probably reflecting lexical access processes. There was a tendency for a positive correlation between part–whole bin measure and Component 2 of PCA. We also found a positive correlation between composite aligned in accuracy and Component 2 of PCA. Our results show that different measures of holistic word processing reflect predominantly different mechanisms, and that differences among normal readers in word reading do not seem to depend highly on holistic processing.The Psychonomic SocietyRepositório da Universidade de LisboaVentura, PauloTse, Helen W.-Y.Guerreiro, José CarlosDelgado, JoãoFerreira, Miguel F.Farinha-Fernandes, AntónioFaustino, BrunoBanha, AlexandreWong, Alan C.-N.2024-03-08T10:41:57Z2022-06-012024-02-05T10:56:25Z2022-06-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/63295engVentura, P., Tse, H. W.-Y., Guerreiro, J. C., Delgado, J., Ferreira, M. F., Farinha-Fernandes, A., Faustino, B., Banha, A., & Wong, A. C.-N. (2022). The relationships between reading fluency and different measures of holistic word processing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(5), 1734-1756. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02497-01943-3921cv-prod-349524510.3758/s13414-022-02497-01943-393Xmetadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T01:19:15Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/63295Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:14:25.981202Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The relationships between reading fluency and different measures of holistic word processing |
title |
The relationships between reading fluency and different measures of holistic word processing |
spellingShingle |
The relationships between reading fluency and different measures of holistic word processing Ventura, Paulo Perceptual expertise Individual differences Holistic processing Word recognition Face recognition |
title_short |
The relationships between reading fluency and different measures of holistic word processing |
title_full |
The relationships between reading fluency and different measures of holistic word processing |
title_fullStr |
The relationships between reading fluency and different measures of holistic word processing |
title_full_unstemmed |
The relationships between reading fluency and different measures of holistic word processing |
title_sort |
The relationships between reading fluency and different measures of holistic word processing |
author |
Ventura, Paulo |
author_facet |
Ventura, Paulo Tse, Helen W.-Y. Guerreiro, José Carlos Delgado, João Ferreira, Miguel F. Farinha-Fernandes, António Faustino, Bruno Banha, Alexandre Wong, Alan C.-N. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tse, Helen W.-Y. Guerreiro, José Carlos Delgado, João Ferreira, Miguel F. Farinha-Fernandes, António Faustino, Bruno Banha, Alexandre Wong, Alan C.-N. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ventura, Paulo Tse, Helen W.-Y. Guerreiro, José Carlos Delgado, João Ferreira, Miguel F. Farinha-Fernandes, António Faustino, Bruno Banha, Alexandre Wong, Alan C.-N. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Perceptual expertise Individual differences Holistic processing Word recognition Face recognition |
topic |
Perceptual expertise Individual differences Holistic processing Word recognition Face recognition |
description |
Recently, paradigms in the face recognition literature have been adopted to reveal holistic processing in word recognition. It is unknown, however, whether different measures of holistic word processing share similar underlying mechanisms, and whether fluent word reading relies on holistic word processing. We measured holistic processing effects in three paradigms (composite, configural sensitivity, part–whole) as well as in reading fluency (3DM task: reading aloud high- and low-frequency words and pseudowords). Bin scores were used to combine accuracy and response time variables in the quest for a more comprehensive, reliable, and valid measure of holistic processing. Weak correlations were found between the different holistic processing measures, with only a significant correlation between the configural sensitivity effect and part–whole effect (r = .32) and a trend of a positive correlation between the word composite effect and configural sensitivity effect (r = .21). Of the three holistic processing measures, only one (part–whole effect) correlated with a lexical access measure of 3DM (r = .23). We also performed a principal component analysis (PCA) of performance in the three lists of 3DM, with the second most probably reflecting lexical access processes. There was a tendency for a positive correlation between part–whole bin measure and Component 2 of PCA. We also found a positive correlation between composite aligned in accuracy and Component 2 of PCA. Our results show that different measures of holistic word processing reflect predominantly different mechanisms, and that differences among normal readers in word reading do not seem to depend highly on holistic processing. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-01 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z 2024-03-08T10:41:57Z 2024-02-05T10:56:25Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/63295 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/63295 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Ventura, P., Tse, H. W.-Y., Guerreiro, J. C., Delgado, J., Ferreira, M. F., Farinha-Fernandes, A., Faustino, B., Banha, A., & Wong, A. C.-N. (2022). The relationships between reading fluency and different measures of holistic word processing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(5), 1734-1756. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02497-0 1943-3921 cv-prod-3495245 10.3758/s13414-022-02497-0 1943-393X |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
metadata only access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
metadata only access |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
The Psychonomic Society |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
The Psychonomic Society |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137797072748544 |