ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THORACOABDOMINAL AND PARA-RENAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS WITH FENESTRATED AND BRANCHED STENT-GRAFTS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Quintas, A.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Albuquerque e Castro, J., Aragão Morais, J., Bastos Gonçalves, F., Ferreira, R., Vasconcelos, L., Alves, G., Abreu, R., Camacho, N., Catarino, J., Ferreira, M. E., Mota Capitão, L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.48750/acv.47
Resumo: Introdution: Aneurismal disease involving the thoracoabdominal segment adds significant complexity to endovascular aortic repair.  Objective: Evaluate institutional experience of a tertiary center in fenestrated and branched aneurysm repair for throracoabdominal or juxtarenal aortic aneurysms Methods: Retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients treated by endovascular repair using fenestrated or branched stent grafts between October 2010 and May 2016. Results: Twenty-six patients underwent endovascular repair with fenestrated and/or branched stent grafts (mean age 68±7years; 1 female). Eleven patients had history of previous aortic intervention. Seventeen throracobdominal aneuryms had the following anatomic distribution: Type I: n=1; Type III: n=5; Type IV: n=6 and Type 5: n=5. Additionally nine pararenal aneuryms were treated. Mean maximum aneurym diameter was 72±25mm. There were 3 types of stent graft configuration based on aortic anatomy and aneurysm morphology:  21 custom-made (14 fenestrated and 7 fenestrated/branched) and 5 off-the-shelf multibranched (T-branch). The median number of fenestrations/branches per stent graft was 4(2-4). The total target visceral vessels involved was 88. In 88% another planned endovascular procedure was performed: EVAR n=15; TEVAR n=4 and EVAR+TEVAR n=4. The technical sucess rate was 96% (25/26) (1 case of ostial stenosis of the celiac trunk with unssucessfull catetherization). The 30 day mortality rate was 7,7% (2/26). Spinal cord ischemia occurred in 12% (N=3; acute onset N=1; delayed N=2) There was no difference between the pre- and post-operative (p=0,777). The mean follow-up time was 10±15 months. There were 2 endoleaks, and no late re-interventions nor late aneurismatic ruptures during the follow-up time. Conclusion: Fenestrated/branched devices development allowed the treatment of complex high risk aneurismatic disease in a less invasive manner. These procedures are technically demanding, but safe and effective in prevention of aneurysm rupture in our experience. Despite the relatively low number of patients, our results are in line with other international contemporary endovascular series.
id RCAP_7a4bba8a8e027eb18bfa6c4fd0dc0465
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.acvjournal.com:article/47
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THORACOABDOMINAL AND PARA-RENAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS WITH FENESTRATED AND BRANCHED STENT-GRAFTSTRATAMENTO ENDOVASCULAR DE ANEURISMAS AÓRTICOS TORACO-ABDOMINAIS OU PARA-RENAIS COM RECURSO A ENDOPRÓTESES FENESTRADAS E/OU RAMIFICADASIntrodution: Aneurismal disease involving the thoracoabdominal segment adds significant complexity to endovascular aortic repair.  Objective: Evaluate institutional experience of a tertiary center in fenestrated and branched aneurysm repair for throracoabdominal or juxtarenal aortic aneurysms Methods: Retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients treated by endovascular repair using fenestrated or branched stent grafts between October 2010 and May 2016. Results: Twenty-six patients underwent endovascular repair with fenestrated and/or branched stent grafts (mean age 68±7years; 1 female). Eleven patients had history of previous aortic intervention. Seventeen throracobdominal aneuryms had the following anatomic distribution: Type I: n=1; Type III: n=5; Type IV: n=6 and Type 5: n=5. Additionally nine pararenal aneuryms were treated. Mean maximum aneurym diameter was 72±25mm. There were 3 types of stent graft configuration based on aortic anatomy and aneurysm morphology:  21 custom-made (14 fenestrated and 7 fenestrated/branched) and 5 off-the-shelf multibranched (T-branch). The median number of fenestrations/branches per stent graft was 4(2-4). The total target visceral vessels involved was 88. In 88% another planned endovascular procedure was performed: EVAR n=15; TEVAR n=4 and EVAR+TEVAR n=4. The technical sucess rate was 96% (25/26) (1 case of ostial stenosis of the celiac trunk with unssucessfull catetherization). The 30 day mortality rate was 7,7% (2/26). Spinal cord ischemia occurred in 12% (N=3; acute onset N=1; delayed N=2) There was no difference between the pre- and post-operative (p=0,777). The mean follow-up time was 10±15 months. There were 2 endoleaks, and no late re-interventions nor late aneurismatic ruptures during the follow-up time. Conclusion: Fenestrated/branched devices development allowed the treatment of complex high risk aneurismatic disease in a less invasive manner. These procedures are technically demanding, but safe and effective in prevention of aneurysm rupture in our experience. Despite the relatively low number of patients, our results are in line with other international contemporary endovascular series.Introdução: O envolvimento da aorta toraco-abdominal na doença aneurismática acresce significativa complexidade ao seu tratamento endovascular. Objectivo: Avaliação de resultados de uma instituição terciária no tratamento endovascular da patologia aneurismática toraco-abdominal ou para-renal, através do uso de endopróteses fenestradas e/ou ramificadas. Material e Métodos: Análise retrospectiva da série consecutiva de doentes com doença aneurismática selecionados para tratamento endovascular através do uso de endopróteses fenestradas e/ou ramificadas no período de Outubro de 2010 a Maio de 2016. Resultados: 26 doentes foram tratados através do uso de endopróteses fenestradas e/ou ramificadas (idade média 68±7 anos; 1 mulher). Onze doentes (42%) tinham antecedentes de intervenção aórtica prévia. Foram tratados 17 aneurismas toracoabdominais cuja distribuição anatómica foi a seguinte: Tipo I: n=1); Tipo III: n=5; Tipo IV: n=6 e Tipo V: n=5. Foram ainda tratados 9 aneurismas aneurismas para-renais. O diâmetro máximo do saco aneurismático era de 72±25mm. Foram implantadas três tipos de endopróteses Zenith Cook® dependendo da anatomia aórtica e da morfologia do aneurisma: custom-made em 21 casos (14 fenestradas e 7 fenestradas/ramificadas) e off-the-shelf multibranched (T-branch) em 5 casos. A mediana de fenestras/ramos por endoprótese foi de 4 (2-4). O número total de vasos viscerais target foi de 89. Em 88% dos casos foi realizado outro procedimento endovascular programado nomeadamente: EVAR aortobiiliaco n=15, TEVAR n=4 e EVAR+TEVAR n=4. A taxa de sucesso técnico aferida foi de 96% (25/26) com um sucesso técnico de revascularização de ramos viscerais de 88/89 (um caso de incapacidade de cateterização tronco celíaco por estenose óstial). A taxa de mortalidade a 30 dias foi de 7,7% (2/26). Verificou-se uma taxa de isquemia medular em 12% (n=3; precoce n=1, tardia n=2). Não foi encontrada diferença estatisticamente significativa entre creatinina pré e a pós-operatoria (P=0,777). A média de tempo follow-up foi de 10±15 meses, durante o qual se verificaram 2 endoleaks. Não se verificaram re-intervenções tardias nem rupturas aneurismáticas tardias. Conclusão: O desenvolvimento de endoprotéses fenestradas/ramificadas abdominais permitiu expandir o tratamento de patologia aneurismática complexa de elevado risco. Trata-se de uma abordagem terapêutica tecnicamente exigente, mas segura e efectiva na prevenção de ruptura aneurismática com resultados sobreponíveis com séries internacionais contemporâneas.Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular2017-05-14T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48750/acv.47oai:ojs.acvjournal.com:article/47Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2017): March; 14-22Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular; Vol. 13 N.º 1 (2017): Março; 14-222183-00961646-706Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/47https://doi.org/10.48750/acv.47http://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/47/36Copyright (c) 2017 Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascularinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQuintas, A.Albuquerque e Castro, J.Aragão Morais, J.Bastos Gonçalves, F.Ferreira, R.Vasconcelos, L.Alves, G.Abreu, R.Camacho, N.Catarino, J.Ferreira, M. E.Mota Capitão, L.2022-05-23T15:09:59Zoai:ojs.acvjournal.com:article/47Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T14:57:27.729700Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THORACOABDOMINAL AND PARA-RENAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS WITH FENESTRATED AND BRANCHED STENT-GRAFTS
TRATAMENTO ENDOVASCULAR DE ANEURISMAS AÓRTICOS TORACO-ABDOMINAIS OU PARA-RENAIS COM RECURSO A ENDOPRÓTESES FENESTRADAS E/OU RAMIFICADAS
title ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THORACOABDOMINAL AND PARA-RENAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS WITH FENESTRATED AND BRANCHED STENT-GRAFTS
spellingShingle ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THORACOABDOMINAL AND PARA-RENAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS WITH FENESTRATED AND BRANCHED STENT-GRAFTS
Quintas, A.
title_short ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THORACOABDOMINAL AND PARA-RENAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS WITH FENESTRATED AND BRANCHED STENT-GRAFTS
title_full ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THORACOABDOMINAL AND PARA-RENAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS WITH FENESTRATED AND BRANCHED STENT-GRAFTS
title_fullStr ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THORACOABDOMINAL AND PARA-RENAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS WITH FENESTRATED AND BRANCHED STENT-GRAFTS
title_full_unstemmed ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THORACOABDOMINAL AND PARA-RENAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS WITH FENESTRATED AND BRANCHED STENT-GRAFTS
title_sort ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF THORACOABDOMINAL AND PARA-RENAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS WITH FENESTRATED AND BRANCHED STENT-GRAFTS
author Quintas, A.
author_facet Quintas, A.
Albuquerque e Castro, J.
Aragão Morais, J.
Bastos Gonçalves, F.
Ferreira, R.
Vasconcelos, L.
Alves, G.
Abreu, R.
Camacho, N.
Catarino, J.
Ferreira, M. E.
Mota Capitão, L.
author_role author
author2 Albuquerque e Castro, J.
Aragão Morais, J.
Bastos Gonçalves, F.
Ferreira, R.
Vasconcelos, L.
Alves, G.
Abreu, R.
Camacho, N.
Catarino, J.
Ferreira, M. E.
Mota Capitão, L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Quintas, A.
Albuquerque e Castro, J.
Aragão Morais, J.
Bastos Gonçalves, F.
Ferreira, R.
Vasconcelos, L.
Alves, G.
Abreu, R.
Camacho, N.
Catarino, J.
Ferreira, M. E.
Mota Capitão, L.
description Introdution: Aneurismal disease involving the thoracoabdominal segment adds significant complexity to endovascular aortic repair.  Objective: Evaluate institutional experience of a tertiary center in fenestrated and branched aneurysm repair for throracoabdominal or juxtarenal aortic aneurysms Methods: Retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients treated by endovascular repair using fenestrated or branched stent grafts between October 2010 and May 2016. Results: Twenty-six patients underwent endovascular repair with fenestrated and/or branched stent grafts (mean age 68±7years; 1 female). Eleven patients had history of previous aortic intervention. Seventeen throracobdominal aneuryms had the following anatomic distribution: Type I: n=1; Type III: n=5; Type IV: n=6 and Type 5: n=5. Additionally nine pararenal aneuryms were treated. Mean maximum aneurym diameter was 72±25mm. There were 3 types of stent graft configuration based on aortic anatomy and aneurysm morphology:  21 custom-made (14 fenestrated and 7 fenestrated/branched) and 5 off-the-shelf multibranched (T-branch). The median number of fenestrations/branches per stent graft was 4(2-4). The total target visceral vessels involved was 88. In 88% another planned endovascular procedure was performed: EVAR n=15; TEVAR n=4 and EVAR+TEVAR n=4. The technical sucess rate was 96% (25/26) (1 case of ostial stenosis of the celiac trunk with unssucessfull catetherization). The 30 day mortality rate was 7,7% (2/26). Spinal cord ischemia occurred in 12% (N=3; acute onset N=1; delayed N=2) There was no difference between the pre- and post-operative (p=0,777). The mean follow-up time was 10±15 months. There were 2 endoleaks, and no late re-interventions nor late aneurismatic ruptures during the follow-up time. Conclusion: Fenestrated/branched devices development allowed the treatment of complex high risk aneurismatic disease in a less invasive manner. These procedures are technically demanding, but safe and effective in prevention of aneurysm rupture in our experience. Despite the relatively low number of patients, our results are in line with other international contemporary endovascular series.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-14T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.48750/acv.47
oai:ojs.acvjournal.com:article/47
url https://doi.org/10.48750/acv.47
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.acvjournal.com:article/47
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/47
https://doi.org/10.48750/acv.47
http://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/47/36
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2017): March; 14-22
Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular; Vol. 13 N.º 1 (2017): Março; 14-22
2183-0096
1646-706X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799129848624447488