Hospital-at-home vs. Hospitalization, the cost-effective model: a systematic review of literature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melo,Maria Inês
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Prata,Ana Paula, Santos,Margarida Reis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-30152023000300209
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: Hospital-at-home and classic hospitalization are two models of care. The sustainability of the National Health Service is a current issue given the scarcity of resources; the implementation of home hospitalization contributes to the discussion about its economic impact. Objective: Identify and synthesize the best available evidence on the cost and effectiveness of hospital-at-home versus classic hospitalization; identify which implementation model has the best cost-effectiveness. Methods: Systematic Review of Literature, according to the protocol of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The selection of studies and the evaluation of their methodological quality (with instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute) were performed by two researchers. In the initial research, 146 studies were identified, and five were included. Results: Hospital-at-home was considered more cost-effective than classic hospitalization. Conclusion: The evidence shows that home hospitalization is more cost-effective than classical hospitalization. However, it needs more studies covering the costs for the user/family/caregivers and economic evaluation studies with higher methodological quality.
id RCAP_7a6f4de97eb5d4d0aa3f866bb7098155
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0873-30152023000300209
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Hospital-at-home vs. Hospitalization, the cost-effective model: a systematic review of literaturehospital-at-homeclassic hospitalizationcost-effectivenessAbstract Introduction: Hospital-at-home and classic hospitalization are two models of care. The sustainability of the National Health Service is a current issue given the scarcity of resources; the implementation of home hospitalization contributes to the discussion about its economic impact. Objective: Identify and synthesize the best available evidence on the cost and effectiveness of hospital-at-home versus classic hospitalization; identify which implementation model has the best cost-effectiveness. Methods: Systematic Review of Literature, according to the protocol of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The selection of studies and the evaluation of their methodological quality (with instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute) were performed by two researchers. In the initial research, 146 studies were identified, and five were included. Results: Hospital-at-home was considered more cost-effective than classic hospitalization. Conclusion: The evidence shows that home hospitalization is more cost-effective than classical hospitalization. However, it needs more studies covering the costs for the user/family/caregivers and economic evaluation studies with higher methodological quality.Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (IPV)2023-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-30152023000300209Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health n.22 2023reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-30152023000300209Melo,Maria InêsPrata,Ana PaulaSantos,Margarida Reisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:10:24Zoai:scielo:S0873-30152023000300209Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:21:57.330654Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hospital-at-home vs. Hospitalization, the cost-effective model: a systematic review of literature
title Hospital-at-home vs. Hospitalization, the cost-effective model: a systematic review of literature
spellingShingle Hospital-at-home vs. Hospitalization, the cost-effective model: a systematic review of literature
Melo,Maria Inês
hospital-at-home
classic hospitalization
cost-effectiveness
title_short Hospital-at-home vs. Hospitalization, the cost-effective model: a systematic review of literature
title_full Hospital-at-home vs. Hospitalization, the cost-effective model: a systematic review of literature
title_fullStr Hospital-at-home vs. Hospitalization, the cost-effective model: a systematic review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Hospital-at-home vs. Hospitalization, the cost-effective model: a systematic review of literature
title_sort Hospital-at-home vs. Hospitalization, the cost-effective model: a systematic review of literature
author Melo,Maria Inês
author_facet Melo,Maria Inês
Prata,Ana Paula
Santos,Margarida Reis
author_role author
author2 Prata,Ana Paula
Santos,Margarida Reis
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo,Maria Inês
Prata,Ana Paula
Santos,Margarida Reis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv hospital-at-home
classic hospitalization
cost-effectiveness
topic hospital-at-home
classic hospitalization
cost-effectiveness
description Abstract Introduction: Hospital-at-home and classic hospitalization are two models of care. The sustainability of the National Health Service is a current issue given the scarcity of resources; the implementation of home hospitalization contributes to the discussion about its economic impact. Objective: Identify and synthesize the best available evidence on the cost and effectiveness of hospital-at-home versus classic hospitalization; identify which implementation model has the best cost-effectiveness. Methods: Systematic Review of Literature, according to the protocol of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The selection of studies and the evaluation of their methodological quality (with instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute) were performed by two researchers. In the initial research, 146 studies were identified, and five were included. Results: Hospital-at-home was considered more cost-effective than classic hospitalization. Conclusion: The evidence shows that home hospitalization is more cost-effective than classical hospitalization. However, it needs more studies covering the costs for the user/family/caregivers and economic evaluation studies with higher methodological quality.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-30152023000300209
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-30152023000300209
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-30152023000300209
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (IPV)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (IPV)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health n.22 2023
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137304226299904