Advantages of an Automated Method Compared With Manual Methods for the Quantification of Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber in Skin Biopsy

• Autor(a) principal: Corrà, Marta
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Sousa, Mafalda, Reis, Inês, Tanganelli, Fabiana, Vila-Chã, Nuno, Sousa, Ana Paula, Magalhães, Rui, Sampaio, Paula, Taipa, Ricardo, Maia, Luis
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/2883
• topic: Automated method; Intraepidermal nerve fiber density; Skin biopsy

Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) measurements in skin biopsy are performed manually by 1-3 operators. To improve diagnostic accuracy and applicability in clinical practice, we developed an automated method for fast IENFD determination with low operator-dependency. Sixty skin biopsy specimens were stained with the axonal marker PGP9.5 and imaged using a widefield fluorescence microscope. IENFD was first determined manually by 3 independent observers. Subsequently, images were processed in their Z-max projection and the intradermal line was delineated automatically. IENFD was calculated automatically (fluorescent images automated counting [FIAC]) and compared with manual counting on the same fluorescence images (fluorescent images manual counting [FIMC]), and with classical manual counting (CMC) data. A FIMC showed lower variability among observers compared with CMC (interclass correlation [ICC] = 0.996 vs 0.950). FIMC and FIAC showed high reliability (ICC = 0.999). A moderate-to-high (ICC = 0.705) was observed between CMC and FIAC counting. The algorithm process took on average 15 seconds to perform FIAC counting, compared with 10 minutes for FIMC counting. This automated method rapidly and reliably detects small nerve fibers in skin biopsies with clear advantages over the classical manual technique.