Performance Comparison of Independence Tests in Two-Way Contingency Table
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i2.403 |
Resumo: | Several test statistics are available for testing the independence of categorical variables from two-way contingency tables. A vast majority of published articles used the Pearson’s chi-squared test for such purposes; however, this test statistic may lead to biased conclusions under certain conditions. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of test statistics via a comprehensive simulation study considering several factors in contingency tables. We also evaluated the performance of each test statistic on a real-life dataset. This study contributes to the literature guiding researchers to select an appropriate test statistic under different conditions. |
id |
RCAP_7d4b86778f5ca48c981cffc7ae71c60b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revstat:article/403 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Performance Comparison of Independence Tests in Two-Way Contingency Tablecontingency tablepowerpower divergencesimulation studytype one errorSeveral test statistics are available for testing the independence of categorical variables from two-way contingency tables. A vast majority of published articles used the Pearson’s chi-squared test for such purposes; however, this test statistic may lead to biased conclusions under certain conditions. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of test statistics via a comprehensive simulation study considering several factors in contingency tables. We also evaluated the performance of each test statistic on a real-life dataset. This study contributes to the literature guiding researchers to select an appropriate test statistic under different conditions.Statistics Portugal2023-06-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i2.403https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i2.403REVSTAT-Statistical Journal; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2023): REVSTAT-Statistical Journal; 219–233REVSTAT; Vol. 21 N.º 2 (2023): REVSTAT-Statistical Journal; 219–2332183-03711645-6726reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revstat.ine.pt/index.php/REVSTAT/article/view/403https://revstat.ine.pt/index.php/REVSTAT/article/view/403/640https://revstat.ine.pt/index.php/REVSTAT/article/view/403/544Copyright (c) 2021 REVSTAT-Statistical Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOzturk , EbruBasol, MerveGoksuluk , DincerKarahan , Sevilay2023-07-01T06:30:13Zoai:revstat:article/403Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:02:13.403466Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Performance Comparison of Independence Tests in Two-Way Contingency Table |
title |
Performance Comparison of Independence Tests in Two-Way Contingency Table |
spellingShingle |
Performance Comparison of Independence Tests in Two-Way Contingency Table Ozturk , Ebru contingency table power power divergence simulation study type one error |
title_short |
Performance Comparison of Independence Tests in Two-Way Contingency Table |
title_full |
Performance Comparison of Independence Tests in Two-Way Contingency Table |
title_fullStr |
Performance Comparison of Independence Tests in Two-Way Contingency Table |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance Comparison of Independence Tests in Two-Way Contingency Table |
title_sort |
Performance Comparison of Independence Tests in Two-Way Contingency Table |
author |
Ozturk , Ebru |
author_facet |
Ozturk , Ebru Basol, Merve Goksuluk , Dincer Karahan , Sevilay |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Basol, Merve Goksuluk , Dincer Karahan , Sevilay |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ozturk , Ebru Basol, Merve Goksuluk , Dincer Karahan , Sevilay |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
contingency table power power divergence simulation study type one error |
topic |
contingency table power power divergence simulation study type one error |
description |
Several test statistics are available for testing the independence of categorical variables from two-way contingency tables. A vast majority of published articles used the Pearson’s chi-squared test for such purposes; however, this test statistic may lead to biased conclusions under certain conditions. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of test statistics via a comprehensive simulation study considering several factors in contingency tables. We also evaluated the performance of each test statistic on a real-life dataset. This study contributes to the literature guiding researchers to select an appropriate test statistic under different conditions. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-26 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i2.403 https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i2.403 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i2.403 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revstat.ine.pt/index.php/REVSTAT/article/view/403 https://revstat.ine.pt/index.php/REVSTAT/article/view/403/640 https://revstat.ine.pt/index.php/REVSTAT/article/view/403/544 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 REVSTAT-Statistical Journal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 REVSTAT-Statistical Journal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Statistics Portugal |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Statistics Portugal |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVSTAT-Statistical Journal; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2023): REVSTAT-Statistical Journal; 219–233 REVSTAT; Vol. 21 N.º 2 (2023): REVSTAT-Statistical Journal; 219–233 2183-0371 1645-6726 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131688426536960 |