AI advice vs. patients’ advice vs. no advice: choosing a doctor

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kaliszewska, Anna
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/92319
Resumo: Due to the development of information technologies and Artificial Intelligence (henceforth AI) solutions, hospitals can match patients’ to doctors more efficiently and effectively. In this research, I investigate trust in advice generated by AI over advice from other people, when a patient selects a doctor for a medical appointment. Data related to trust, likelihood to follow the received recommendation, likelihood to select a doctor, and demographics were collected via an online questionnaire to investigate whether people accept or refuse advice to choose a doctor based on AI advice (vs. other patients’ advice or no advice). The experiment revealed that patients are more likely to select a doctor following advice from AI, as compared to when they receive advice from other people or no advice at all. Moreover, patients trusted more AI advice than advice from other people. These results have important practical implication: they suggest that hospitals should inform patients about benefits and dispel doubts of using AI in matching-system through educational programs and leaflets. Finally, they also suggest developing AI recommender-systems that can share AI consultations with a selected physician.
id RCAP_7e652632b26837e4a9dd978c6302a33f
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/92319
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling AI advice vs. patients’ advice vs. no advice: choosing a doctorAI advicedoctorpatienttrustalgorithmslikelihoodDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoDue to the development of information technologies and Artificial Intelligence (henceforth AI) solutions, hospitals can match patients’ to doctors more efficiently and effectively. In this research, I investigate trust in advice generated by AI over advice from other people, when a patient selects a doctor for a medical appointment. Data related to trust, likelihood to follow the received recommendation, likelihood to select a doctor, and demographics were collected via an online questionnaire to investigate whether people accept or refuse advice to choose a doctor based on AI advice (vs. other patients’ advice or no advice). The experiment revealed that patients are more likely to select a doctor following advice from AI, as compared to when they receive advice from other people or no advice at all. Moreover, patients trusted more AI advice than advice from other people. These results have important practical implication: they suggest that hospitals should inform patients about benefits and dispel doubts of using AI in matching-system through educational programs and leaflets. Finally, they also suggest developing AI recommender-systems that can share AI consultations with a selected physician.Consiglio, IreneRUNKaliszewska, Anna2020-02-06T16:21:37Z2019-09-202019-09-20T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/92319TID:202417956enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:41:10Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/92319Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:37:31.168617Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv AI advice vs. patients’ advice vs. no advice: choosing a doctor
title AI advice vs. patients’ advice vs. no advice: choosing a doctor
spellingShingle AI advice vs. patients’ advice vs. no advice: choosing a doctor
Kaliszewska, Anna
AI advice
doctor
patient
trust
algorithms
likelihood
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short AI advice vs. patients’ advice vs. no advice: choosing a doctor
title_full AI advice vs. patients’ advice vs. no advice: choosing a doctor
title_fullStr AI advice vs. patients’ advice vs. no advice: choosing a doctor
title_full_unstemmed AI advice vs. patients’ advice vs. no advice: choosing a doctor
title_sort AI advice vs. patients’ advice vs. no advice: choosing a doctor
author Kaliszewska, Anna
author_facet Kaliszewska, Anna
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Consiglio, Irene
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kaliszewska, Anna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv AI advice
doctor
patient
trust
algorithms
likelihood
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic AI advice
doctor
patient
trust
algorithms
likelihood
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description Due to the development of information technologies and Artificial Intelligence (henceforth AI) solutions, hospitals can match patients’ to doctors more efficiently and effectively. In this research, I investigate trust in advice generated by AI over advice from other people, when a patient selects a doctor for a medical appointment. Data related to trust, likelihood to follow the received recommendation, likelihood to select a doctor, and demographics were collected via an online questionnaire to investigate whether people accept or refuse advice to choose a doctor based on AI advice (vs. other patients’ advice or no advice). The experiment revealed that patients are more likely to select a doctor following advice from AI, as compared to when they receive advice from other people or no advice at all. Moreover, patients trusted more AI advice than advice from other people. These results have important practical implication: they suggest that hospitals should inform patients about benefits and dispel doubts of using AI in matching-system through educational programs and leaflets. Finally, they also suggest developing AI recommender-systems that can share AI consultations with a selected physician.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-20
2019-09-20T00:00:00Z
2020-02-06T16:21:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/92319
TID:202417956
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/92319
identifier_str_mv TID:202417956
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137991881392128