On righteousness and dignity : two challenging issues since early modern times
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/5312 |
Resumo: | Concepts such as righteousness, equality, tolerance and freedom are nowadays considered fundamental issues that should prevail in any society. Balance and righteousness thrive however on a very thin layer. We are, in fact, living in an era of duality and antithetical paradigms. This essay approaches two Renaissance authors who dealt with the same matters in their works, at a very different time and through different ways of reflection: Thomas More and Sir Walter Raleigh. |
id |
RCAP_7f2844cce3e4c88d5f5a03f4f35f9603 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorioaberto.uab.pt:10400.2/5312 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
On righteousness and dignity : two challenging issues since early modern timesRenaissanceHumanismThomas MoreWalter RaleighConcepts such as righteousness, equality, tolerance and freedom are nowadays considered fundamental issues that should prevail in any society. Balance and righteousness thrive however on a very thin layer. We are, in fact, living in an era of duality and antithetical paradigms. This essay approaches two Renaissance authors who dealt with the same matters in their works, at a very different time and through different ways of reflection: Thomas More and Sir Walter Raleigh.FLULRepositório AbertoRelvas, Maria de Jesus2016-05-20T13:07:52Z20132013-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/5312eng978-972-8886-21-9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-16T15:21:54Zoai:repositorioaberto.uab.pt:10400.2/5312Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:46:03.268389Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On righteousness and dignity : two challenging issues since early modern times |
title |
On righteousness and dignity : two challenging issues since early modern times |
spellingShingle |
On righteousness and dignity : two challenging issues since early modern times Relvas, Maria de Jesus Renaissance Humanism Thomas More Walter Raleigh |
title_short |
On righteousness and dignity : two challenging issues since early modern times |
title_full |
On righteousness and dignity : two challenging issues since early modern times |
title_fullStr |
On righteousness and dignity : two challenging issues since early modern times |
title_full_unstemmed |
On righteousness and dignity : two challenging issues since early modern times |
title_sort |
On righteousness and dignity : two challenging issues since early modern times |
author |
Relvas, Maria de Jesus |
author_facet |
Relvas, Maria de Jesus |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Aberto |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Relvas, Maria de Jesus |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Renaissance Humanism Thomas More Walter Raleigh |
topic |
Renaissance Humanism Thomas More Walter Raleigh |
description |
Concepts such as righteousness, equality, tolerance and freedom are nowadays considered fundamental issues that should prevail in any society. Balance and righteousness thrive however on a very thin layer. We are, in fact, living in an era of duality and antithetical paradigms. This essay approaches two Renaissance authors who dealt with the same matters in their works, at a very different time and through different ways of reflection: Thomas More and Sir Walter Raleigh. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z 2016-05-20T13:07:52Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/5312 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/5312 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
978-972-8886-21-9 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FLUL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FLUL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799135033889390592 |