Greenhouse gas emissions due to land use change in Brazil from 1990 to 2015: comparison of methodological approaches

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sanquetta, Carlos
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Corte, Ana Paula Dalla, Sanquetta, Mateus, Pelissari, Allan, Tomé, Margarida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/20336
Resumo: Net CO2 emissions due to land-use change (LUC) resulting from the conversion of natural forest vegetation in Brazil were analyzed over 25 years (1990-2015). Recognized data sources were studied and emission values were compared. Our analysis included LUC emissions over time, which were stratified by biome. In addition, implications for the fulfillment of commitments assumed by Brazil in the Paris Agreement were discussed. Net LUC greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from 1990 to 2015 totaled 26GtCO2eq. These values were published and updated officially on the National Emissions Registration System. Another renowned source of information regarding Brazil’s GHG emissions is the System for Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals Estimates, which is managed by the Climate Observatory. Although this platform uses a different methodology, it displayed total values that were very similar to the official estimates, except for some differences between individual biome emissions. The Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database, which is based on reports of forest resources, reported lower values of about 21GtCO2eq, thereby showing significant differences among biomes when compared to the two aforementioned sources. Amazonia was responsible for 65% to 80% of all emissions domestic during the studied period. Considering these reductions and the commitments assumed by Brazil (43% reduction in emissions by 2030), the country is expected to reach its goal and contribute to the Paris Agreement. All three analyzed data sources reported estimates for CO2 emissions with differences of up to 18%. The Amazon biome contributed the most to emissions over the studied period, regardless of the source. All analyzed reports displayed reductions in LUC CO2 emissions in Brazil for the last few years of analysis. These results indicate the possibility of Brazil fulfilling the commitments established by the Paris Agreement. The main differences among the methodologies analyzed are due to the vegetation cover mapping approaches
id RCAP_7f9ebfa67b8d23c11382ab29fe7678d0
oai_identifier_str oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/20336
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Greenhouse gas emissions due to land use change in Brazil from 1990 to 2015: comparison of methodological approachesEmissões de GEE por mudança no uso da terra no Brazil no período 1990 a 2015: comparação de abordagens metodológicasbiomescarbon stockforest conversiondeforestationgreenhouse gasesNet CO2 emissions due to land-use change (LUC) resulting from the conversion of natural forest vegetation in Brazil were analyzed over 25 years (1990-2015). Recognized data sources were studied and emission values were compared. Our analysis included LUC emissions over time, which were stratified by biome. In addition, implications for the fulfillment of commitments assumed by Brazil in the Paris Agreement were discussed. Net LUC greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from 1990 to 2015 totaled 26GtCO2eq. These values were published and updated officially on the National Emissions Registration System. Another renowned source of information regarding Brazil’s GHG emissions is the System for Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals Estimates, which is managed by the Climate Observatory. Although this platform uses a different methodology, it displayed total values that were very similar to the official estimates, except for some differences between individual biome emissions. The Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database, which is based on reports of forest resources, reported lower values of about 21GtCO2eq, thereby showing significant differences among biomes when compared to the two aforementioned sources. Amazonia was responsible for 65% to 80% of all emissions domestic during the studied period. Considering these reductions and the commitments assumed by Brazil (43% reduction in emissions by 2030), the country is expected to reach its goal and contribute to the Paris Agreement. All three analyzed data sources reported estimates for CO2 emissions with differences of up to 18%. The Amazon biome contributed the most to emissions over the studied period, regardless of the source. All analyzed reports displayed reductions in LUC CO2 emissions in Brazil for the last few years of analysis. These results indicate the possibility of Brazil fulfilling the commitments established by the Paris Agreement. The main differences among the methodologies analyzed are due to the vegetation cover mapping approachesUFPRRepositório da Universidade de LisboaSanquetta, CarlosCorte, Ana Paula DallaSanquetta, MateusPelissari, AllanTomé, Margarida2020-09-17T11:50:27Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/20336engdesenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, Vol. 53, p. 25-37, jan./jun. 202010.5380/dma.v53i0.68494info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-06T14:49:46Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/20336Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:05:06.376914Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Greenhouse gas emissions due to land use change in Brazil from 1990 to 2015: comparison of methodological approaches
Emissões de GEE por mudança no uso da terra no Brazil no período 1990 a 2015: comparação de abordagens metodológicas
title Greenhouse gas emissions due to land use change in Brazil from 1990 to 2015: comparison of methodological approaches
spellingShingle Greenhouse gas emissions due to land use change in Brazil from 1990 to 2015: comparison of methodological approaches
Sanquetta, Carlos
biomes
carbon stock
forest conversion
deforestation
greenhouse gases
title_short Greenhouse gas emissions due to land use change in Brazil from 1990 to 2015: comparison of methodological approaches
title_full Greenhouse gas emissions due to land use change in Brazil from 1990 to 2015: comparison of methodological approaches
title_fullStr Greenhouse gas emissions due to land use change in Brazil from 1990 to 2015: comparison of methodological approaches
title_full_unstemmed Greenhouse gas emissions due to land use change in Brazil from 1990 to 2015: comparison of methodological approaches
title_sort Greenhouse gas emissions due to land use change in Brazil from 1990 to 2015: comparison of methodological approaches
author Sanquetta, Carlos
author_facet Sanquetta, Carlos
Corte, Ana Paula Dalla
Sanquetta, Mateus
Pelissari, Allan
Tomé, Margarida
author_role author
author2 Corte, Ana Paula Dalla
Sanquetta, Mateus
Pelissari, Allan
Tomé, Margarida
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sanquetta, Carlos
Corte, Ana Paula Dalla
Sanquetta, Mateus
Pelissari, Allan
Tomé, Margarida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv biomes
carbon stock
forest conversion
deforestation
greenhouse gases
topic biomes
carbon stock
forest conversion
deforestation
greenhouse gases
description Net CO2 emissions due to land-use change (LUC) resulting from the conversion of natural forest vegetation in Brazil were analyzed over 25 years (1990-2015). Recognized data sources were studied and emission values were compared. Our analysis included LUC emissions over time, which were stratified by biome. In addition, implications for the fulfillment of commitments assumed by Brazil in the Paris Agreement were discussed. Net LUC greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from 1990 to 2015 totaled 26GtCO2eq. These values were published and updated officially on the National Emissions Registration System. Another renowned source of information regarding Brazil’s GHG emissions is the System for Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals Estimates, which is managed by the Climate Observatory. Although this platform uses a different methodology, it displayed total values that were very similar to the official estimates, except for some differences between individual biome emissions. The Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database, which is based on reports of forest resources, reported lower values of about 21GtCO2eq, thereby showing significant differences among biomes when compared to the two aforementioned sources. Amazonia was responsible for 65% to 80% of all emissions domestic during the studied period. Considering these reductions and the commitments assumed by Brazil (43% reduction in emissions by 2030), the country is expected to reach its goal and contribute to the Paris Agreement. All three analyzed data sources reported estimates for CO2 emissions with differences of up to 18%. The Amazon biome contributed the most to emissions over the studied period, regardless of the source. All analyzed reports displayed reductions in LUC CO2 emissions in Brazil for the last few years of analysis. These results indicate the possibility of Brazil fulfilling the commitments established by the Paris Agreement. The main differences among the methodologies analyzed are due to the vegetation cover mapping approaches
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-17T11:50:27Z
2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/20336
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/20336
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, Vol. 53, p. 25-37, jan./jun. 2020
10.5380/dma.v53i0.68494
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFPR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFPR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131143240417280