What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Francisco, Inês
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Travassos, Raquel, Nunes, Catarina, Ribeiro, Madalena, Marques, Filipa, Pereira, Flávia, Marto, Carlos Miguel, Carrilho, Eunice, Oliveiros, Bárbara, Paula, Anabela Baptista, Vale, Francisco
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9010014
Resumo: Background: There has been an increase in demand for orthodontic treatment within the adult population, who likely receive restorative treatments using ceramic structures. The current state of the art regarding the most effective method to achieve an appropriate bond strength of brackets on ceramic surfaces isn't consensual. This systematic review aims to compare the available surface treatments to ceramics and determine the one that allows to obtain the best bond strength. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO methodology was used, with the question "What is the most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic crowns or veneers?". The research was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. The methodological quality was evaluated using the guidelines for reporting of preclinical studies on dental materials by Faggion Jr. Results: A total of 655 articles searched in various databases were initially scrutinized. Sevety one articles were chosen for quality analysis. The risk of bias was considered medium to high in most studies. The use of hydrofluoric acid (HF), silane and laser afforded the overall best results. HF and HF plus laser achieved significantly highest bond strength scores in felsdphatic porcelain, while laser was the best treatment in lithium disilicate ceramics. Conclusions: The most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic is dependent on the type of ceramic.
id RCAP_8021f59c08b77544ea5c5acd45062331
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103186
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisadhesionbondingdental porcelainglass ceramicsorthodontic bracketshear strengthBackground: There has been an increase in demand for orthodontic treatment within the adult population, who likely receive restorative treatments using ceramic structures. The current state of the art regarding the most effective method to achieve an appropriate bond strength of brackets on ceramic surfaces isn't consensual. This systematic review aims to compare the available surface treatments to ceramics and determine the one that allows to obtain the best bond strength. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO methodology was used, with the question "What is the most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic crowns or veneers?". The research was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. The methodological quality was evaluated using the guidelines for reporting of preclinical studies on dental materials by Faggion Jr. Results: A total of 655 articles searched in various databases were initially scrutinized. Sevety one articles were chosen for quality analysis. The risk of bias was considered medium to high in most studies. The use of hydrofluoric acid (HF), silane and laser afforded the overall best results. HF and HF plus laser achieved significantly highest bond strength scores in felsdphatic porcelain, while laser was the best treatment in lithium disilicate ceramics. Conclusions: The most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic is dependent on the type of ceramic.2022-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9010014eng2306-5354Francisco, InêsTravassos, RaquelNunes, CatarinaRibeiro, MadalenaMarques, FilipaPereira, FláviaMarto, Carlos MiguelCarrilho, EuniceOliveiros, BárbaraPaula, Anabela BaptistaVale, Franciscoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-10-20T20:31:52Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103186Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:20:03.819025Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
spellingShingle What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Francisco, Inês
adhesion
bonding
dental porcelain
glass ceramics
orthodontic bracket
shear strength
title_short What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
author Francisco, Inês
author_facet Francisco, Inês
Travassos, Raquel
Nunes, Catarina
Ribeiro, Madalena
Marques, Filipa
Pereira, Flávia
Marto, Carlos Miguel
Carrilho, Eunice
Oliveiros, Bárbara
Paula, Anabela Baptista
Vale, Francisco
author_role author
author2 Travassos, Raquel
Nunes, Catarina
Ribeiro, Madalena
Marques, Filipa
Pereira, Flávia
Marto, Carlos Miguel
Carrilho, Eunice
Oliveiros, Bárbara
Paula, Anabela Baptista
Vale, Francisco
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Francisco, Inês
Travassos, Raquel
Nunes, Catarina
Ribeiro, Madalena
Marques, Filipa
Pereira, Flávia
Marto, Carlos Miguel
Carrilho, Eunice
Oliveiros, Bárbara
Paula, Anabela Baptista
Vale, Francisco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv adhesion
bonding
dental porcelain
glass ceramics
orthodontic bracket
shear strength
topic adhesion
bonding
dental porcelain
glass ceramics
orthodontic bracket
shear strength
description Background: There has been an increase in demand for orthodontic treatment within the adult population, who likely receive restorative treatments using ceramic structures. The current state of the art regarding the most effective method to achieve an appropriate bond strength of brackets on ceramic surfaces isn't consensual. This systematic review aims to compare the available surface treatments to ceramics and determine the one that allows to obtain the best bond strength. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO methodology was used, with the question "What is the most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic crowns or veneers?". The research was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. The methodological quality was evaluated using the guidelines for reporting of preclinical studies on dental materials by Faggion Jr. Results: A total of 655 articles searched in various databases were initially scrutinized. Sevety one articles were chosen for quality analysis. The risk of bias was considered medium to high in most studies. The use of hydrofluoric acid (HF), silane and laser afforded the overall best results. HF and HF plus laser achieved significantly highest bond strength scores in felsdphatic porcelain, while laser was the best treatment in lithium disilicate ceramics. Conclusions: The most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic is dependent on the type of ceramic.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-03
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9010014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9010014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2306-5354
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134093771800576