What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186 https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9010014 |
Resumo: | Background: There has been an increase in demand for orthodontic treatment within the adult population, who likely receive restorative treatments using ceramic structures. The current state of the art regarding the most effective method to achieve an appropriate bond strength of brackets on ceramic surfaces isn't consensual. This systematic review aims to compare the available surface treatments to ceramics and determine the one that allows to obtain the best bond strength. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO methodology was used, with the question "What is the most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic crowns or veneers?". The research was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. The methodological quality was evaluated using the guidelines for reporting of preclinical studies on dental materials by Faggion Jr. Results: A total of 655 articles searched in various databases were initially scrutinized. Sevety one articles were chosen for quality analysis. The risk of bias was considered medium to high in most studies. The use of hydrofluoric acid (HF), silane and laser afforded the overall best results. HF and HF plus laser achieved significantly highest bond strength scores in felsdphatic porcelain, while laser was the best treatment in lithium disilicate ceramics. Conclusions: The most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic is dependent on the type of ceramic. |
id |
RCAP_8021f59c08b77544ea5c5acd45062331 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103186 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisadhesionbondingdental porcelainglass ceramicsorthodontic bracketshear strengthBackground: There has been an increase in demand for orthodontic treatment within the adult population, who likely receive restorative treatments using ceramic structures. The current state of the art regarding the most effective method to achieve an appropriate bond strength of brackets on ceramic surfaces isn't consensual. This systematic review aims to compare the available surface treatments to ceramics and determine the one that allows to obtain the best bond strength. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO methodology was used, with the question "What is the most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic crowns or veneers?". The research was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. The methodological quality was evaluated using the guidelines for reporting of preclinical studies on dental materials by Faggion Jr. Results: A total of 655 articles searched in various databases were initially scrutinized. Sevety one articles were chosen for quality analysis. The risk of bias was considered medium to high in most studies. The use of hydrofluoric acid (HF), silane and laser afforded the overall best results. HF and HF plus laser achieved significantly highest bond strength scores in felsdphatic porcelain, while laser was the best treatment in lithium disilicate ceramics. Conclusions: The most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic is dependent on the type of ceramic.2022-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9010014eng2306-5354Francisco, InêsTravassos, RaquelNunes, CatarinaRibeiro, MadalenaMarques, FilipaPereira, FláviaMarto, Carlos MiguelCarrilho, EuniceOliveiros, BárbaraPaula, Anabela BaptistaVale, Franciscoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-10-20T20:31:52Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103186Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:20:03.819025Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title |
What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
spellingShingle |
What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Francisco, Inês adhesion bonding dental porcelain glass ceramics orthodontic bracket shear strength |
title_short |
What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
author |
Francisco, Inês |
author_facet |
Francisco, Inês Travassos, Raquel Nunes, Catarina Ribeiro, Madalena Marques, Filipa Pereira, Flávia Marto, Carlos Miguel Carrilho, Eunice Oliveiros, Bárbara Paula, Anabela Baptista Vale, Francisco |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Travassos, Raquel Nunes, Catarina Ribeiro, Madalena Marques, Filipa Pereira, Flávia Marto, Carlos Miguel Carrilho, Eunice Oliveiros, Bárbara Paula, Anabela Baptista Vale, Francisco |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Francisco, Inês Travassos, Raquel Nunes, Catarina Ribeiro, Madalena Marques, Filipa Pereira, Flávia Marto, Carlos Miguel Carrilho, Eunice Oliveiros, Bárbara Paula, Anabela Baptista Vale, Francisco |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
adhesion bonding dental porcelain glass ceramics orthodontic bracket shear strength |
topic |
adhesion bonding dental porcelain glass ceramics orthodontic bracket shear strength |
description |
Background: There has been an increase in demand for orthodontic treatment within the adult population, who likely receive restorative treatments using ceramic structures. The current state of the art regarding the most effective method to achieve an appropriate bond strength of brackets on ceramic surfaces isn't consensual. This systematic review aims to compare the available surface treatments to ceramics and determine the one that allows to obtain the best bond strength. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO methodology was used, with the question "What is the most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic crowns or veneers?". The research was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. The methodological quality was evaluated using the guidelines for reporting of preclinical studies on dental materials by Faggion Jr. Results: A total of 655 articles searched in various databases were initially scrutinized. Sevety one articles were chosen for quality analysis. The risk of bias was considered medium to high in most studies. The use of hydrofluoric acid (HF), silane and laser afforded the overall best results. HF and HF plus laser achieved significantly highest bond strength scores in felsdphatic porcelain, while laser was the best treatment in lithium disilicate ceramics. Conclusions: The most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic is dependent on the type of ceramic. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-03 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186 http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186 https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9010014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103186 https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9010014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2306-5354 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134093771800576 |