An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacy-based Public Health Interventions: Addressing Methodological Challenges

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, S
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cary, M, Helling, D, Pereira, J, Mateus, C
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://revista.farmacoterapia.pt/index.php/rpf/article/view/263
Resumo: BackgroundPharmacy interventions are a subset of public health interventions and its research is usually performed within the scope of a trial. The economic evaluation of pharmacy interventions requires certain considerations which have some similarities to those of public health interventions and to economic evaluations alongside trials. The objective of this research is to perform an overview of systematic reviews of economic evaluations of pharmacy services and triangulate results with recommendations for economic evaluations of both public health interventions and alongside trials. Methods (1) Exploratory review of recommendations on the economic evaluation of public health interventions, (2) exploratory review of recommendations for conducting economic evaluations alongside trials, (3) overview of systematic reviews of economic evaluations of pharmacy interventions (protocol registered with PROSPERO 2016 outlining information sources, inclusion criteria, appraisal of reviews and synthesis methods). Results Fourteen systematic reviews containing 75 index publications were included. Reviews reported favorable economic findings for 71% of studies with full economic evaluations. The types of economic analysis are diverse. Two critical quality domains are absent from most reviews. Key findings include the following: certain types of risk of bias, wider scope of study designs, and most economic quality criteria met but some issues unresolved or unclear. Triangulation revealed additional gaps. Limitations include choice of critical quality domains and potential biases in the overview process. ConclusionsEconomic evaluations of pharmacy-based public health interventions seem to follow most economic quality criteria, but there are still some issues in certain key areas to improve. These findings may assist in improving the design of pilot trials of economic evaluations in pharmacy, leading to robust evidence for payers. Based on the findings, we propose a methodological approach for the economic evaluation of pharmacy-based public health interventions. Published in: Syst Rev. 2019: 8:272  
id RCAP_8072c9bfcc39b8c7ad30cde5089e94af
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.farmacoterapia.pt:article/263
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacy-based Public Health Interventions: Addressing Methodological ChallengesBackgroundPharmacy interventions are a subset of public health interventions and its research is usually performed within the scope of a trial. The economic evaluation of pharmacy interventions requires certain considerations which have some similarities to those of public health interventions and to economic evaluations alongside trials. The objective of this research is to perform an overview of systematic reviews of economic evaluations of pharmacy services and triangulate results with recommendations for economic evaluations of both public health interventions and alongside trials. Methods (1) Exploratory review of recommendations on the economic evaluation of public health interventions, (2) exploratory review of recommendations for conducting economic evaluations alongside trials, (3) overview of systematic reviews of economic evaluations of pharmacy interventions (protocol registered with PROSPERO 2016 outlining information sources, inclusion criteria, appraisal of reviews and synthesis methods). Results Fourteen systematic reviews containing 75 index publications were included. Reviews reported favorable economic findings for 71% of studies with full economic evaluations. The types of economic analysis are diverse. Two critical quality domains are absent from most reviews. Key findings include the following: certain types of risk of bias, wider scope of study designs, and most economic quality criteria met but some issues unresolved or unclear. Triangulation revealed additional gaps. Limitations include choice of critical quality domains and potential biases in the overview process. ConclusionsEconomic evaluations of pharmacy-based public health interventions seem to follow most economic quality criteria, but there are still some issues in certain key areas to improve. These findings may assist in improving the design of pilot trials of economic evaluations in pharmacy, leading to robust evidence for payers. Based on the findings, we propose a methodological approach for the economic evaluation of pharmacy-based public health interventions. Published in: Syst Rev. 2019: 8:272  Formifarma2019-12-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://revista.farmacoterapia.pt/index.php/rpf/article/view/263Revista Portuguesa de Farmacoterapia / Portuguese Journal of Pharmacotherapy; Vol 11 No Sup 1 (2019): Suplemento 1; S32Revista Portuguesa de Farmacoterapia; v. 11 n. Sup 1 (2019): Suplemento 1; S322183-73411647-354Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://revista.farmacoterapia.pt/index.php/rpf/article/view/263http://revista.farmacoterapia.pt/index.php/rpf/article/view/263/237Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Revista Portuguesa de Farmacoterapiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, SCary, MHelling, DPereira, JMateus, C2023-09-01T04:34:28Zoai:ojs.farmacoterapia.pt:article/263Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:11:40.646684Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacy-based Public Health Interventions: Addressing Methodological Challenges
title An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacy-based Public Health Interventions: Addressing Methodological Challenges
spellingShingle An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacy-based Public Health Interventions: Addressing Methodological Challenges
Costa, S
title_short An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacy-based Public Health Interventions: Addressing Methodological Challenges
title_full An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacy-based Public Health Interventions: Addressing Methodological Challenges
title_fullStr An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacy-based Public Health Interventions: Addressing Methodological Challenges
title_full_unstemmed An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacy-based Public Health Interventions: Addressing Methodological Challenges
title_sort An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacy-based Public Health Interventions: Addressing Methodological Challenges
author Costa, S
author_facet Costa, S
Cary, M
Helling, D
Pereira, J
Mateus, C
author_role author
author2 Cary, M
Helling, D
Pereira, J
Mateus, C
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, S
Cary, M
Helling, D
Pereira, J
Mateus, C
description BackgroundPharmacy interventions are a subset of public health interventions and its research is usually performed within the scope of a trial. The economic evaluation of pharmacy interventions requires certain considerations which have some similarities to those of public health interventions and to economic evaluations alongside trials. The objective of this research is to perform an overview of systematic reviews of economic evaluations of pharmacy services and triangulate results with recommendations for economic evaluations of both public health interventions and alongside trials. Methods (1) Exploratory review of recommendations on the economic evaluation of public health interventions, (2) exploratory review of recommendations for conducting economic evaluations alongside trials, (3) overview of systematic reviews of economic evaluations of pharmacy interventions (protocol registered with PROSPERO 2016 outlining information sources, inclusion criteria, appraisal of reviews and synthesis methods). Results Fourteen systematic reviews containing 75 index publications were included. Reviews reported favorable economic findings for 71% of studies with full economic evaluations. The types of economic analysis are diverse. Two critical quality domains are absent from most reviews. Key findings include the following: certain types of risk of bias, wider scope of study designs, and most economic quality criteria met but some issues unresolved or unclear. Triangulation revealed additional gaps. Limitations include choice of critical quality domains and potential biases in the overview process. ConclusionsEconomic evaluations of pharmacy-based public health interventions seem to follow most economic quality criteria, but there are still some issues in certain key areas to improve. These findings may assist in improving the design of pilot trials of economic evaluations in pharmacy, leading to robust evidence for payers. Based on the findings, we propose a methodological approach for the economic evaluation of pharmacy-based public health interventions. Published in: Syst Rev. 2019: 8:272  
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revista.farmacoterapia.pt/index.php/rpf/article/view/263
url http://revista.farmacoterapia.pt/index.php/rpf/article/view/263
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revista.farmacoterapia.pt/index.php/rpf/article/view/263
http://revista.farmacoterapia.pt/index.php/rpf/article/view/263/237
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Revista Portuguesa de Farmacoterapia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Revista Portuguesa de Farmacoterapia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Formifarma
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Formifarma
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Portuguesa de Farmacoterapia / Portuguese Journal of Pharmacotherapy; Vol 11 No Sup 1 (2019): Suplemento 1; S32
Revista Portuguesa de Farmacoterapia; v. 11 n. Sup 1 (2019): Suplemento 1; S32
2183-7341
1647-354X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799129986978807808