The human-reptile bond and its implications for the welfare of captive semiaquatic turtles in Portugal

• Autor(a) principal: Guimarães, Maria Leonor da Fonseca e Castro Lobato
• Data de Publicação: 2018
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/24505
• topic: Animal Welfare; Captivity; Semiaquatic Turtles; Human-animal Bond; Animal Behaviour; Exotic Pet Medicine; Survey; Bem-estar animal; Cativeiro; Tartarugas semiaquáticas; Ligação homem-animal; Comportamento animal; Medicina de animais exóticos; Questionário

Semiaquatic turtles are common pets but are arguably one of the most difficult reptiles to maintain because of species-specific thermal, hydric, dietary and behavioural requirements that call for specialized care. Furthermore, keepers’ familiarity with reptilian behavioural and psychological health is largely uncommon. The purpose of this study was to investigate the welfare of captive semiaquatic turtles in Portugal and relate it with the human-animal bond. A survey was developed and 114 turtle keepers participated (Nov.2017 - Feb.2018). The majority of respondents considered the welfare of their animals as being good or very good (75.4%). Regarding the human-reptile bond, 65.8 % of keepers considered their turtle to be a “member of the family”, 64.0% of people claimed to talk with their turtle more than 5 times a week and 70.2% pet them at least once a week. Those who considered the animal to be a family member/friend were not seen to provide better husbandry conditions such as UVB lamp, heat sources or control over temperatures (p>0.05 for all). Over one third of owners (35.9%) never took their turtle to the veterinarian. Having a UVB lamp, providing a heat source and having control over temperatures were not influenced by having visited a veterinary clinician (p>0.05 for all). We conclude that, although most keepers perceive semiaquatic turtles as family members, talking to them and petting them regularly, basic husbandry requirements are not being adequately met. This puts into question to what extent is the human-reptile bond an indicator of good welfare. Whether the problem is lack of proper information, poor communication between the clinician and the keeper, noncompliance or mere negligence are questions that call for additional research.