Common medical and statistical problems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/116610 |
Resumo: | Sample size calculation in biomedical practice is typically based on the problematicWald method for a binomial proportion, with potentially dangerous consequences. This work highlights the need of incorporating the concept of conditional probability in sample size determination to avoid reduced sample sizes that lead to inadequate confidence intervals. Therefore, new definitions are proposed for coverage probability and expected length of confidence intervals for conditional probabilities, like sensitivity and specificity. The new definitions were used to assess seven confidence interval estimation methods. In order to determine the sample size, two procedures-an optimal one, based on the new definitions, and an approximation-were developed for each estimation method. Our findings confirm the similarity of the approximated sample sizes to the optimal ones. R code is provided to disseminate these methodological advances and translate them into biomedical practice. |
id |
RCAP_82c3202f7937ab022b537e55931f4f7f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:run.unl.pt:10362/116610 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Common medical and statistical problemsthe dilemma of the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity estimationConditional probabilityCoverage probabilitySample sizeSensitivitySpecificityApplied MathematicsSample size calculation in biomedical practice is typically based on the problematicWald method for a binomial proportion, with potentially dangerous consequences. This work highlights the need of incorporating the concept of conditional probability in sample size determination to avoid reduced sample sizes that lead to inadequate confidence intervals. Therefore, new definitions are proposed for coverage probability and expected length of confidence intervals for conditional probabilities, like sensitivity and specificity. The new definitions were used to assess seven confidence interval estimation methods. In order to determine the sample size, two procedures-an optimal one, based on the new definitions, and an approximation-were developed for each estimation method. Our findings confirm the similarity of the approximated sample sizes to the optimal ones. R code is provided to disseminate these methodological advances and translate them into biomedical practice.Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT)Global Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM)Population health, policies and services (PPS)RUNOliveira, M. RosárioSubtil, AnaGonçalves, Luzia2021-05-01T22:51:15Z2020-08-012020-08-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article17application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/116610engPURE: 19727604https://doi.org/10.3390/MATH8081258info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:59:16Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/116610Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:43:09.840812Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Common medical and statistical problems the dilemma of the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity estimation |
title |
Common medical and statistical problems |
spellingShingle |
Common medical and statistical problems Oliveira, M. Rosário Conditional probability Coverage probability Sample size Sensitivity Specificity Applied Mathematics |
title_short |
Common medical and statistical problems |
title_full |
Common medical and statistical problems |
title_fullStr |
Common medical and statistical problems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Common medical and statistical problems |
title_sort |
Common medical and statistical problems |
author |
Oliveira, M. Rosário |
author_facet |
Oliveira, M. Rosário Subtil, Ana Gonçalves, Luzia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Subtil, Ana Gonçalves, Luzia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT) Global Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM) Population health, policies and services (PPS) RUN |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, M. Rosário Subtil, Ana Gonçalves, Luzia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Conditional probability Coverage probability Sample size Sensitivity Specificity Applied Mathematics |
topic |
Conditional probability Coverage probability Sample size Sensitivity Specificity Applied Mathematics |
description |
Sample size calculation in biomedical practice is typically based on the problematicWald method for a binomial proportion, with potentially dangerous consequences. This work highlights the need of incorporating the concept of conditional probability in sample size determination to avoid reduced sample sizes that lead to inadequate confidence intervals. Therefore, new definitions are proposed for coverage probability and expected length of confidence intervals for conditional probabilities, like sensitivity and specificity. The new definitions were used to assess seven confidence interval estimation methods. In order to determine the sample size, two procedures-an optimal one, based on the new definitions, and an approximation-were developed for each estimation method. Our findings confirm the similarity of the approximated sample sizes to the optimal ones. R code is provided to disseminate these methodological advances and translate them into biomedical practice. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-01 2020-08-01T00:00:00Z 2021-05-01T22:51:15Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/116610 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10362/116610 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
PURE: 19727604 https://doi.org/10.3390/MATH8081258 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
17 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799138041885884416 |