Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tolbert, Caroline J.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Kuznetsova, Daria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385
Resumo: Dissatisfaction with two-party politics is at an all-time high in the US. As extreme polarization and minority rule persist, a possibility of an electoral reform becomes increasingly more likely. This editor’s introduction discusses the ranked choice voting (RCV) as an alternative to the current single-member geographic districts with winner-take-all plurality elections in the US. The articles for this thematic issue critically evaluate whether RCV lives up to its promise in improving democracy in the US. Like any rule or institutional change, it has benefits and drawbacks. The empirical and historical research presented here focuses on the implementation and use of RCV in the US compared to other countries. This thematic issue offers new insights into the promise and perils of RCV as a way to aggregate votes in elections that ensure that the winning candidate receives a majority of the votes cast.
id RCAP_8450cf1b466ee444e561689cf929fefe
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4385
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Votingalternative vote; electoral system; democracy; multipartism; plurality elections; polarization; proportional representation; ranked choice voting; single transferable vote; two-party systemDissatisfaction with two-party politics is at an all-time high in the US. As extreme polarization and minority rule persist, a possibility of an electoral reform becomes increasingly more likely. This editor’s introduction discusses the ranked choice voting (RCV) as an alternative to the current single-member geographic districts with winner-take-all plurality elections in the US. The articles for this thematic issue critically evaluate whether RCV lives up to its promise in improving democracy in the US. Like any rule or institutional change, it has benefits and drawbacks. The empirical and historical research presented here focuses on the implementation and use of RCV in the US compared to other countries. This thematic issue offers new insights into the promise and perils of RCV as a way to aggregate votes in elections that ensure that the winning candidate receives a majority of the votes cast.Cogitatio2021-06-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4385Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 2 (2021): The Politics, Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting; 265-2702183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4385https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4385/4385Copyright (c) 2021 Caroline J. Tolbert, Daria Kuznetsovahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTolbert, Caroline J.Kuznetsova, Daria2022-10-21T16:04:12Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4385Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:13:54.165172Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting
title Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting
spellingShingle Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting
Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting
Tolbert, Caroline J.
alternative vote; electoral system; democracy; multipartism; plurality elections; polarization; proportional representation; ranked choice voting; single transferable vote; two-party system
Tolbert, Caroline J.
alternative vote; electoral system; democracy; multipartism; plurality elections; polarization; proportional representation; ranked choice voting; single transferable vote; two-party system
title_short Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting
title_full Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting
title_fullStr Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting
Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting
title_full_unstemmed Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting
Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting
title_sort Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting
author Tolbert, Caroline J.
author_facet Tolbert, Caroline J.
Tolbert, Caroline J.
Kuznetsova, Daria
Kuznetsova, Daria
author_role author
author2 Kuznetsova, Daria
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tolbert, Caroline J.
Kuznetsova, Daria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv alternative vote; electoral system; democracy; multipartism; plurality elections; polarization; proportional representation; ranked choice voting; single transferable vote; two-party system
topic alternative vote; electoral system; democracy; multipartism; plurality elections; polarization; proportional representation; ranked choice voting; single transferable vote; two-party system
description Dissatisfaction with two-party politics is at an all-time high in the US. As extreme polarization and minority rule persist, a possibility of an electoral reform becomes increasingly more likely. This editor’s introduction discusses the ranked choice voting (RCV) as an alternative to the current single-member geographic districts with winner-take-all plurality elections in the US. The articles for this thematic issue critically evaluate whether RCV lives up to its promise in improving democracy in the US. Like any rule or institutional change, it has benefits and drawbacks. The empirical and historical research presented here focuses on the implementation and use of RCV in the US compared to other countries. This thematic issue offers new insights into the promise and perils of RCV as a way to aggregate votes in elections that ensure that the winning candidate receives a majority of the votes cast.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4385
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4385
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4385
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4385/4385
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Caroline J. Tolbert, Daria Kuznetsova
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Caroline J. Tolbert, Daria Kuznetsova
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 2 (2021): The Politics, Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting; 265-270
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1822243732459618304
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385