Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
DOI: | 10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385 |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385 |
Resumo: | Dissatisfaction with two-party politics is at an all-time high in the US. As extreme polarization and minority rule persist, a possibility of an electoral reform becomes increasingly more likely. This editor’s introduction discusses the ranked choice voting (RCV) as an alternative to the current single-member geographic districts with winner-take-all plurality elections in the US. The articles for this thematic issue critically evaluate whether RCV lives up to its promise in improving democracy in the US. Like any rule or institutional change, it has benefits and drawbacks. The empirical and historical research presented here focuses on the implementation and use of RCV in the US compared to other countries. This thematic issue offers new insights into the promise and perils of RCV as a way to aggregate votes in elections that ensure that the winning candidate receives a majority of the votes cast. |
id |
RCAP_8450cf1b466ee444e561689cf929fefe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4385 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Votingalternative vote; electoral system; democracy; multipartism; plurality elections; polarization; proportional representation; ranked choice voting; single transferable vote; two-party systemDissatisfaction with two-party politics is at an all-time high in the US. As extreme polarization and minority rule persist, a possibility of an electoral reform becomes increasingly more likely. This editor’s introduction discusses the ranked choice voting (RCV) as an alternative to the current single-member geographic districts with winner-take-all plurality elections in the US. The articles for this thematic issue critically evaluate whether RCV lives up to its promise in improving democracy in the US. Like any rule or institutional change, it has benefits and drawbacks. The empirical and historical research presented here focuses on the implementation and use of RCV in the US compared to other countries. This thematic issue offers new insights into the promise and perils of RCV as a way to aggregate votes in elections that ensure that the winning candidate receives a majority of the votes cast.Cogitatio2021-06-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4385Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 2 (2021): The Politics, Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting; 265-2702183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4385https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4385/4385Copyright (c) 2021 Caroline J. Tolbert, Daria Kuznetsovahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTolbert, Caroline J.Kuznetsova, Daria2022-10-21T16:04:12Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4385Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:13:54.165172Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting |
title |
Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting |
spellingShingle |
Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting Tolbert, Caroline J. alternative vote; electoral system; democracy; multipartism; plurality elections; polarization; proportional representation; ranked choice voting; single transferable vote; two-party system Tolbert, Caroline J. alternative vote; electoral system; democracy; multipartism; plurality elections; polarization; proportional representation; ranked choice voting; single transferable vote; two-party system |
title_short |
Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting |
title_full |
Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting |
title_fullStr |
Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting |
title_full_unstemmed |
Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting |
title_sort |
Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting |
author |
Tolbert, Caroline J. |
author_facet |
Tolbert, Caroline J. Tolbert, Caroline J. Kuznetsova, Daria Kuznetsova, Daria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kuznetsova, Daria |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tolbert, Caroline J. Kuznetsova, Daria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
alternative vote; electoral system; democracy; multipartism; plurality elections; polarization; proportional representation; ranked choice voting; single transferable vote; two-party system |
topic |
alternative vote; electoral system; democracy; multipartism; plurality elections; polarization; proportional representation; ranked choice voting; single transferable vote; two-party system |
description |
Dissatisfaction with two-party politics is at an all-time high in the US. As extreme polarization and minority rule persist, a possibility of an electoral reform becomes increasingly more likely. This editor’s introduction discusses the ranked choice voting (RCV) as an alternative to the current single-member geographic districts with winner-take-all plurality elections in the US. The articles for this thematic issue critically evaluate whether RCV lives up to its promise in improving democracy in the US. Like any rule or institutional change, it has benefits and drawbacks. The empirical and historical research presented here focuses on the implementation and use of RCV in the US compared to other countries. This thematic issue offers new insights into the promise and perils of RCV as a way to aggregate votes in elections that ensure that the winning candidate receives a majority of the votes cast. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-15 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4385 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4385 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4385 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4385/4385 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Caroline J. Tolbert, Daria Kuznetsova http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Caroline J. Tolbert, Daria Kuznetsova http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 2 (2021): The Politics, Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting; 265-270 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1822243732459618304 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385 |