An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Correia, T.
Data de Publicação: 2011
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/2013
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10472
Resumo: This article focuses on a specific debate within theories of professions. Despite different trends, there has been difficulty in theorizing some dimensions of the dominant perspectives because of predominant institutional attention. The aim here was to reinforce the debate with complementary conceptualization of professionalism and, consequently, to foster new understandings of professional relationships. The argument lies in shifting the analytical level from the professions to professionals, as a basic step in conceptualizing individual action within professional contexts. This concern becomes increasingly important as the professional discretion structurally held by individuals becomes greater, since the ability to choose leads more explicitly to internal differentiation of professions. Systemic influence is felt given that social structures are intrinsically involved in actions, which represent exteriorizations of individually internalized processes. Consequently, it becomes necessary to consider the reasons for behaviors and the meanings individually conferred on professional dimensions.
id RCAP_845a8e41afbacaf956d335f8fcc81c62
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10472
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professionsMedical discretionSocial structuresAgencySociological theorySociology of professionsThis article focuses on a specific debate within theories of professions. Despite different trends, there has been difficulty in theorizing some dimensions of the dominant perspectives because of predominant institutional attention. The aim here was to reinforce the debate with complementary conceptualization of professionalism and, consequently, to foster new understandings of professional relationships. The argument lies in shifting the analytical level from the professions to professionals, as a basic step in conceptualizing individual action within professional contexts. This concern becomes increasingly important as the professional discretion structurally held by individuals becomes greater, since the ability to choose leads more explicitly to internal differentiation of professions. Systemic influence is felt given that social structures are intrinsically involved in actions, which represent exteriorizations of individually internalized processes. Consequently, it becomes necessary to consider the reasons for behaviors and the meanings individually conferred on professional dimensions.UNESP2015-12-22T16:29:29Z2011-01-01T00:00:00Z20112015-12-22T16:19:38Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/2013http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10472eng1414-3283Correia, T.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:43:50Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10472Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:20:40.936301Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions
title An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions
spellingShingle An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions
Correia, T.
Medical discretion
Social structures
Agency
Sociological theory
Sociology of professions
title_short An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions
title_full An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions
title_fullStr An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions
title_full_unstemmed An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions
title_sort An open-system approach of medical professionalism: a controversy within the sociology of professions
author Correia, T.
author_facet Correia, T.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Correia, T.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Medical discretion
Social structures
Agency
Sociological theory
Sociology of professions
topic Medical discretion
Social structures
Agency
Sociological theory
Sociology of professions
description This article focuses on a specific debate within theories of professions. Despite different trends, there has been difficulty in theorizing some dimensions of the dominant perspectives because of predominant institutional attention. The aim here was to reinforce the debate with complementary conceptualization of professionalism and, consequently, to foster new understandings of professional relationships. The argument lies in shifting the analytical level from the professions to professionals, as a basic step in conceptualizing individual action within professional contexts. This concern becomes increasingly important as the professional discretion structurally held by individuals becomes greater, since the ability to choose leads more explicitly to internal differentiation of professions. Systemic influence is felt given that social structures are intrinsically involved in actions, which represent exteriorizations of individually internalized processes. Consequently, it becomes necessary to consider the reasons for behaviors and the meanings individually conferred on professional dimensions.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
2011
2015-12-22T16:29:29Z
2015-12-22T16:19:38Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/2013
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10472
url https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/2013
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/10472
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1414-3283
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNESP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNESP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134767214493696