Governing a Divided Ocean: The Transformative Power of Ecological Connectivity in the BBNJ negotiations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tessnow-von Wysocki, Ina
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Vadrot, Alice B. M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5428
Resumo: Science plays an important role in the emergence, development, and implementation of new environmental regimes. However, there are opposing views regarding the type of knowledge that is considered policy-relevant to address global environmental problems. In intergovernmental negotiations, these tensions are visible in debates about the inclusion of scientific concepts in a negotiated text. This article analyses the case of “ecological connectivity” in the negotiations for an international legally-binding instrument (ILBI) for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). As a key scientific concept portraying the ocean as one, the term ecological connectivity challenges the status quo and has far-reaching implications for future ocean governance. Our study draws on ethnographic data collected during the BBNJ negotiations and analyses the actors and their different rationales for including the ecological connectivity concept in the treaty text. Our results demonstrate two things. First, state and non-state actors use the ecological connectivity concept to support their interests in the new ILBI, based on different types of rationales: ecologic, socio-economic, juridic, and epistemic. Second, our analysis demonstrates that several actors recognise the limitations of the existing legal order underpinning ocean governance in areas beyond national jurisdiction and are keen to embrace a new legal framework regarding the idea of an interconnected ocean. We conclude that while the ecological connectivity concept runs the risk of losing its meaning in an array of competing political interests, it does have the potential to achieve transformative change in global ocean governance and fundamentally alter the way humans use and protect BBNJ.
id RCAP_84dc8ef2e51172f297131ef022d0374c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5428
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Governing a Divided Ocean: The Transformative Power of Ecological Connectivity in the BBNJ negotiationsbiodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction; diplomacy; ecological connectivity; intergovernmental negotiations; marine biodiversity; ocean governance; United NationsScience plays an important role in the emergence, development, and implementation of new environmental regimes. However, there are opposing views regarding the type of knowledge that is considered policy-relevant to address global environmental problems. In intergovernmental negotiations, these tensions are visible in debates about the inclusion of scientific concepts in a negotiated text. This article analyses the case of “ecological connectivity” in the negotiations for an international legally-binding instrument (ILBI) for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). As a key scientific concept portraying the ocean as one, the term ecological connectivity challenges the status quo and has far-reaching implications for future ocean governance. Our study draws on ethnographic data collected during the BBNJ negotiations and analyses the actors and their different rationales for including the ecological connectivity concept in the treaty text. Our results demonstrate two things. First, state and non-state actors use the ecological connectivity concept to support their interests in the new ILBI, based on different types of rationales: ecologic, socio-economic, juridic, and epistemic. Second, our analysis demonstrates that several actors recognise the limitations of the existing legal order underpinning ocean governance in areas beyond national jurisdiction and are keen to embrace a new legal framework regarding the idea of an interconnected ocean. We conclude that while the ecological connectivity concept runs the risk of losing its meaning in an array of competing political interests, it does have the potential to achieve transformative change in global ocean governance and fundamentally alter the way humans use and protect BBNJ.Cogitatio2022-07-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5428oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5428Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Constructing Ocean and Polar Governance; 14-282183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5428https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5428https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5428/5428https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/5428/2584Copyright (c) 2022 Ina Tessnow-von Wysocki, Alice B. M. Vadrothttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTessnow-von Wysocki, InaVadrot, Alice B. M.2022-10-21T16:03:54Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5428Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:13:48.289435Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Governing a Divided Ocean: The Transformative Power of Ecological Connectivity in the BBNJ negotiations
title Governing a Divided Ocean: The Transformative Power of Ecological Connectivity in the BBNJ negotiations
spellingShingle Governing a Divided Ocean: The Transformative Power of Ecological Connectivity in the BBNJ negotiations
Tessnow-von Wysocki, Ina
biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction; diplomacy; ecological connectivity; intergovernmental negotiations; marine biodiversity; ocean governance; United Nations
title_short Governing a Divided Ocean: The Transformative Power of Ecological Connectivity in the BBNJ negotiations
title_full Governing a Divided Ocean: The Transformative Power of Ecological Connectivity in the BBNJ negotiations
title_fullStr Governing a Divided Ocean: The Transformative Power of Ecological Connectivity in the BBNJ negotiations
title_full_unstemmed Governing a Divided Ocean: The Transformative Power of Ecological Connectivity in the BBNJ negotiations
title_sort Governing a Divided Ocean: The Transformative Power of Ecological Connectivity in the BBNJ negotiations
author Tessnow-von Wysocki, Ina
author_facet Tessnow-von Wysocki, Ina
Vadrot, Alice B. M.
author_role author
author2 Vadrot, Alice B. M.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tessnow-von Wysocki, Ina
Vadrot, Alice B. M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction; diplomacy; ecological connectivity; intergovernmental negotiations; marine biodiversity; ocean governance; United Nations
topic biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction; diplomacy; ecological connectivity; intergovernmental negotiations; marine biodiversity; ocean governance; United Nations
description Science plays an important role in the emergence, development, and implementation of new environmental regimes. However, there are opposing views regarding the type of knowledge that is considered policy-relevant to address global environmental problems. In intergovernmental negotiations, these tensions are visible in debates about the inclusion of scientific concepts in a negotiated text. This article analyses the case of “ecological connectivity” in the negotiations for an international legally-binding instrument (ILBI) for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). As a key scientific concept portraying the ocean as one, the term ecological connectivity challenges the status quo and has far-reaching implications for future ocean governance. Our study draws on ethnographic data collected during the BBNJ negotiations and analyses the actors and their different rationales for including the ecological connectivity concept in the treaty text. Our results demonstrate two things. First, state and non-state actors use the ecological connectivity concept to support their interests in the new ILBI, based on different types of rationales: ecologic, socio-economic, juridic, and epistemic. Second, our analysis demonstrates that several actors recognise the limitations of the existing legal order underpinning ocean governance in areas beyond national jurisdiction and are keen to embrace a new legal framework regarding the idea of an interconnected ocean. We conclude that while the ecological connectivity concept runs the risk of losing its meaning in an array of competing political interests, it does have the potential to achieve transformative change in global ocean governance and fundamentally alter the way humans use and protect BBNJ.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-14
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5428
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5428
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5428
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5428
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5428
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5428
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5428/5428
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/5428/2584
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Ina Tessnow-von Wysocki, Alice B. M. Vadrot
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Ina Tessnow-von Wysocki, Alice B. M. Vadrot
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Constructing Ocean and Polar Governance; 14-28
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130591285739520