Death: the concept to the diagnosis: controversies and ethical dilemmas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.spmi.pt/index.php/rpmi/article/view/1668 |
Resumo: | In the last fi fty years the technical and scientifi c advances in fifty years the technical and scientific advances in the area of medicine have introduced into clinical practice new concepts of death, the diagnosis of which entails the production of an elaborate list of evidence. The coexistence of various criteria of death has been a controversial issue and subject to intense debate.With discussions caught up in a stalemate of unclear concepts and defi nitions, criteria of cerebral death were ratifi ed in most countries. Portugal adopted the death of the brain stem as the criterion that has been applied since 1994.In this article, after putting the issue into historical perspective, the different defi nitions, criteria and testing of death are revised, mainly from an ethical point of view, in reference to the main arguments put forth by advocates of each position.It is concluded that the inexistence of a single concept of death, together with the variation of criteria and testing methods are the evidence of the weakness of these defi nitions. Therefore clinical situations which are considered irreversible may no longer be so, depending on the scientifi c knowledge about the physiopathology of diseases and therapeutic resources. In relation to the tests used in the diagnosis of death, it is concluded that performing the apnea testing violates the most elementary rules employed to avoid irreversible brain damage in the treatment of patients with intracranial hypertension.This makes a serious effort of therapeutic investigation into the situations of coma and apnea mandatory at the same time as an overall revision of testing methods in order to exclude the apnea testing. |
id |
RCAP_84e41307d7c51f31cbdf60a37e479f3d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.revista.spmi.pt:article/1668 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Death: the concept to the diagnosis: controversies and ethical dilemmasDo conceito ao diagnóstico de morte: controvérsias e dilemas éticoséticamortemorte cerebralNeurologiaEthicsDeathBrain deathNeurologyIn the last fi fty years the technical and scientifi c advances in fifty years the technical and scientific advances in the area of medicine have introduced into clinical practice new concepts of death, the diagnosis of which entails the production of an elaborate list of evidence. The coexistence of various criteria of death has been a controversial issue and subject to intense debate.With discussions caught up in a stalemate of unclear concepts and defi nitions, criteria of cerebral death were ratifi ed in most countries. Portugal adopted the death of the brain stem as the criterion that has been applied since 1994.In this article, after putting the issue into historical perspective, the different defi nitions, criteria and testing of death are revised, mainly from an ethical point of view, in reference to the main arguments put forth by advocates of each position.It is concluded that the inexistence of a single concept of death, together with the variation of criteria and testing methods are the evidence of the weakness of these defi nitions. Therefore clinical situations which are considered irreversible may no longer be so, depending on the scientifi c knowledge about the physiopathology of diseases and therapeutic resources. In relation to the tests used in the diagnosis of death, it is concluded that performing the apnea testing violates the most elementary rules employed to avoid irreversible brain damage in the treatment of patients with intracranial hypertension.This makes a serious effort of therapeutic investigation into the situations of coma and apnea mandatory at the same time as an overall revision of testing methods in order to exclude the apnea testing.Nos últimos cinquenta anos os avanços técnico – científicos na ficos na área da medicina introduziram na prática clínica novos conceitos de morte, cujo diagnóstico implica a execução de uma elaborada lista de provas. A coexistência de vários critérios de morte tem sido assunto controverso e sujeito a intenso debate.Com uma discussão inquinada por um emaranhado de definições e conceitos pouco claros, foram ratificados os critérios de morte cerebral em quase todos os países. Portugal adoptou como critério a morte do tronco cerebral que vem sendo aplicada desde 1994.Neste artigo, depois de perspectivar historicamente a questão, é feita uma revisão das diferentes defi nições, critérios e testes de morte, com referência aos argumentos mais importantes utilizados pelas diferentes posições, valorizando o ponto de vista ético.Conclui-se que a inexistência de um só conceito de morte acompanhado pela variação dos critérios e dos testes utilizados são a evidência da fragilidade das defi nições, fazendo supor que as situações clínicas consideradas irreversíveis podem deixar de sê-lo, dependendo da evolução do conhecimento científi co sobre a fisiopatologia das doenças e dos recursos terapêuticos. Relativamente aos testes utilizados no diagnóstico de morte, conclui-se que a realização do teste da apneia viola as regras mais elementares empregues no tratamento de doentes com hipertensão intracraniana destinadas a evitar a lesão encefálica irreversível, sendo mandatório que se faça um esforço sério de investigação terapêutica das situações de coma e apneia, ao mesmo tempo que deveriam ser revistos os testes a utilizar de forma a excluir o teste da apneia.Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna2005-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://revista.spmi.pt/index.php/rpmi/article/view/1668Internal Medicine; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2005): Janeiro/ Março; 6-10Medicina Interna; Vol. 12 N.º 1 (2005): Janeiro/ Março; 6-102183-99800872-671Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.spmi.pt/index.php/rpmi/article/view/1668https://revista.spmi.pt/index.php/rpmi/article/view/1668/1130Lima, Cristinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-04-01T06:11:05Zoai:oai.revista.spmi.pt:article/1668Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:48:13.778205Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Death: the concept to the diagnosis: controversies and ethical dilemmas Do conceito ao diagnóstico de morte: controvérsias e dilemas éticos |
title |
Death: the concept to the diagnosis: controversies and ethical dilemmas |
spellingShingle |
Death: the concept to the diagnosis: controversies and ethical dilemmas Lima, Cristina ética morte morte cerebral Neurologia Ethics Death Brain death Neurology |
title_short |
Death: the concept to the diagnosis: controversies and ethical dilemmas |
title_full |
Death: the concept to the diagnosis: controversies and ethical dilemmas |
title_fullStr |
Death: the concept to the diagnosis: controversies and ethical dilemmas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Death: the concept to the diagnosis: controversies and ethical dilemmas |
title_sort |
Death: the concept to the diagnosis: controversies and ethical dilemmas |
author |
Lima, Cristina |
author_facet |
Lima, Cristina |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Cristina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ética morte morte cerebral Neurologia Ethics Death Brain death Neurology |
topic |
ética morte morte cerebral Neurologia Ethics Death Brain death Neurology |
description |
In the last fi fty years the technical and scientifi c advances in fifty years the technical and scientific advances in the area of medicine have introduced into clinical practice new concepts of death, the diagnosis of which entails the production of an elaborate list of evidence. The coexistence of various criteria of death has been a controversial issue and subject to intense debate.With discussions caught up in a stalemate of unclear concepts and defi nitions, criteria of cerebral death were ratifi ed in most countries. Portugal adopted the death of the brain stem as the criterion that has been applied since 1994.In this article, after putting the issue into historical perspective, the different defi nitions, criteria and testing of death are revised, mainly from an ethical point of view, in reference to the main arguments put forth by advocates of each position.It is concluded that the inexistence of a single concept of death, together with the variation of criteria and testing methods are the evidence of the weakness of these defi nitions. Therefore clinical situations which are considered irreversible may no longer be so, depending on the scientifi c knowledge about the physiopathology of diseases and therapeutic resources. In relation to the tests used in the diagnosis of death, it is concluded that performing the apnea testing violates the most elementary rules employed to avoid irreversible brain damage in the treatment of patients with intracranial hypertension.This makes a serious effort of therapeutic investigation into the situations of coma and apnea mandatory at the same time as an overall revision of testing methods in order to exclude the apnea testing. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-03-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spmi.pt/index.php/rpmi/article/view/1668 |
url |
https://revista.spmi.pt/index.php/rpmi/article/view/1668 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spmi.pt/index.php/rpmi/article/view/1668 https://revista.spmi.pt/index.php/rpmi/article/view/1668/1130 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Internal Medicine; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2005): Janeiro/ Março; 6-10 Medicina Interna; Vol. 12 N.º 1 (2005): Janeiro/ Março; 6-10 2183-9980 0872-671X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131565097222144 |