Protection of democratic processes and electoral acts from Russian digital active measures: 2016 as a reference year

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silvestre, Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11144/5423
Resumo: Russia has been credibly accused of trying to weaken Western liberal democracies with use of digital means. Cybersecurity experts, intelligence agencies, investigative journalists, and government services, have detailed the Kremlin's actions in illegally accessing digital infrastructures, disseminating stolen contents online, and influencing political debate on digital platforms to create dissention and polarization. These initiatives are included in a wider strategy of altering the balance of power in the international order via what are known as ‘active measures’. Two of the most consequential recent application of this kind of measures took place in 2016, in the United States Presidential Elections and in the Brexit Referendum. Reports made public with the assessments of errors committed by the United States and the United Kingdom governments show there was an insufficient protection of those two crucial public consultation processes. The mistakes made by these countries in protecting democracy from hostile agents with a high level of digital proficiency, should be a point of interest, and urgency, for the European Union. It is to be expected that this kind of influence operation will continue, and become more sophisticated, as they can target elections in Member States of the Union, but also for the European Parliament. The early detection, applying of countermeasures, and the sharing of information with the voters of this kind of attacks by foreign agencies is an important defense mechanism that needs to be strengthen and expanded.
id RCAP_84e6fa009d067515b8463bb0e100d5dc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ual.pt:11144/5423
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Protection of democratic processes and electoral acts from Russian digital active measures: 2016 as a reference yearDemocracyintelligence agenciesdigital platformsRussian FederationEuropean UnionRussia has been credibly accused of trying to weaken Western liberal democracies with use of digital means. Cybersecurity experts, intelligence agencies, investigative journalists, and government services, have detailed the Kremlin's actions in illegally accessing digital infrastructures, disseminating stolen contents online, and influencing political debate on digital platforms to create dissention and polarization. These initiatives are included in a wider strategy of altering the balance of power in the international order via what are known as ‘active measures’. Two of the most consequential recent application of this kind of measures took place in 2016, in the United States Presidential Elections and in the Brexit Referendum. Reports made public with the assessments of errors committed by the United States and the United Kingdom governments show there was an insufficient protection of those two crucial public consultation processes. The mistakes made by these countries in protecting democracy from hostile agents with a high level of digital proficiency, should be a point of interest, and urgency, for the European Union. It is to be expected that this kind of influence operation will continue, and become more sophisticated, as they can target elections in Member States of the Union, but also for the European Parliament. The early detection, applying of countermeasures, and the sharing of information with the voters of this kind of attacks by foreign agencies is an important defense mechanism that needs to be strengthen and expanded.OBERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa2022-05-16T10:07:10Z2022-05-01T00:00:00Z2022-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11144/5423eng1647-7251https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.13.1.2Silvestre, Ricardoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-11T02:15:13Zoai:repositorio.ual.pt:11144/5423Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:32:56.651254Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Protection of democratic processes and electoral acts from Russian digital active measures: 2016 as a reference year
title Protection of democratic processes and electoral acts from Russian digital active measures: 2016 as a reference year
spellingShingle Protection of democratic processes and electoral acts from Russian digital active measures: 2016 as a reference year
Silvestre, Ricardo
Democracy
intelligence agencies
digital platforms
Russian Federation
European Union
title_short Protection of democratic processes and electoral acts from Russian digital active measures: 2016 as a reference year
title_full Protection of democratic processes and electoral acts from Russian digital active measures: 2016 as a reference year
title_fullStr Protection of democratic processes and electoral acts from Russian digital active measures: 2016 as a reference year
title_full_unstemmed Protection of democratic processes and electoral acts from Russian digital active measures: 2016 as a reference year
title_sort Protection of democratic processes and electoral acts from Russian digital active measures: 2016 as a reference year
author Silvestre, Ricardo
author_facet Silvestre, Ricardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silvestre, Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracy
intelligence agencies
digital platforms
Russian Federation
European Union
topic Democracy
intelligence agencies
digital platforms
Russian Federation
European Union
description Russia has been credibly accused of trying to weaken Western liberal democracies with use of digital means. Cybersecurity experts, intelligence agencies, investigative journalists, and government services, have detailed the Kremlin's actions in illegally accessing digital infrastructures, disseminating stolen contents online, and influencing political debate on digital platforms to create dissention and polarization. These initiatives are included in a wider strategy of altering the balance of power in the international order via what are known as ‘active measures’. Two of the most consequential recent application of this kind of measures took place in 2016, in the United States Presidential Elections and in the Brexit Referendum. Reports made public with the assessments of errors committed by the United States and the United Kingdom governments show there was an insufficient protection of those two crucial public consultation processes. The mistakes made by these countries in protecting democracy from hostile agents with a high level of digital proficiency, should be a point of interest, and urgency, for the European Union. It is to be expected that this kind of influence operation will continue, and become more sophisticated, as they can target elections in Member States of the Union, but also for the European Parliament. The early detection, applying of countermeasures, and the sharing of information with the voters of this kind of attacks by foreign agencies is an important defense mechanism that needs to be strengthen and expanded.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-16T10:07:10Z
2022-05-01T00:00:00Z
2022-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11144/5423
url http://hdl.handle.net/11144/5423
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1647-7251
https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.13.1.2
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv OBERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv OBERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136808918843392