Admissible equivalence systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/6934 |
Resumo: | Whenever a logic is the set of theorems of some deductive system, where the latter has an equivalence system, the behavioral theorems of the logic can be determined by means of that equivalence system. In general, this original equivalence system may be too restrictive, because it su ces to check behavioral theorems by means of any admissible equivalence system (that is an equivalence system of the small- est deductive system associated with the given logic). In this paper, we present a range of examples, which show that: 1) there is an admissible equivalence system which is not an equivalence system for the initial deductive system, 2) there is a non- nitely equivalential deductive system with a nite admissible equivalence system, and 3) there is a deductive system with an admissible equivalence sys- tems, such that this deductive system is not even protoalgebraic itself. We use methods and results from algebraic and modal logic. |
id |
RCAP_84e98546e6eb5d4b618f2f98e1e77f41 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/6934 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Admissible equivalence systemsAbstract algebraic logicEquivalence systemsAdmissible rulesLeibniz operatorBehavioral theoremsWhenever a logic is the set of theorems of some deductive system, where the latter has an equivalence system, the behavioral theorems of the logic can be determined by means of that equivalence system. In general, this original equivalence system may be too restrictive, because it su ces to check behavioral theorems by means of any admissible equivalence system (that is an equivalence system of the small- est deductive system associated with the given logic). In this paper, we present a range of examples, which show that: 1) there is an admissible equivalence system which is not an equivalence system for the initial deductive system, 2) there is a non- nitely equivalential deductive system with a nite admissible equivalence system, and 3) there is a deductive system with an admissible equivalence sys- tems, such that this deductive system is not even protoalgebraic itself. We use methods and results from algebraic and modal logic.Department of Logic, University of Lodz2012-02-27T16:27:54Z2010-01-01T00:00:00Z2010info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/6934eng0138-0680Babenyshev, SergeyMartins, Manuel A.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T11:07:04Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/6934Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:43:07.130773Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Admissible equivalence systems |
title |
Admissible equivalence systems |
spellingShingle |
Admissible equivalence systems Babenyshev, Sergey Abstract algebraic logic Equivalence systems Admissible rules Leibniz operator Behavioral theorems |
title_short |
Admissible equivalence systems |
title_full |
Admissible equivalence systems |
title_fullStr |
Admissible equivalence systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Admissible equivalence systems |
title_sort |
Admissible equivalence systems |
author |
Babenyshev, Sergey |
author_facet |
Babenyshev, Sergey Martins, Manuel A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins, Manuel A. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Babenyshev, Sergey Martins, Manuel A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Abstract algebraic logic Equivalence systems Admissible rules Leibniz operator Behavioral theorems |
topic |
Abstract algebraic logic Equivalence systems Admissible rules Leibniz operator Behavioral theorems |
description |
Whenever a logic is the set of theorems of some deductive system, where the latter has an equivalence system, the behavioral theorems of the logic can be determined by means of that equivalence system. In general, this original equivalence system may be too restrictive, because it su ces to check behavioral theorems by means of any admissible equivalence system (that is an equivalence system of the small- est deductive system associated with the given logic). In this paper, we present a range of examples, which show that: 1) there is an admissible equivalence system which is not an equivalence system for the initial deductive system, 2) there is a non- nitely equivalential deductive system with a nite admissible equivalence system, and 3) there is a deductive system with an admissible equivalence sys- tems, such that this deductive system is not even protoalgebraic itself. We use methods and results from algebraic and modal logic. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z 2010 2012-02-27T16:27:54Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/6934 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/6934 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0138-0680 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Department of Logic, University of Lodz |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Department of Logic, University of Lodz |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137480024260608 |