Expert-Led Securitization: The Case of the 2009 Pandemic in Denmark and Sweden
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.2982 |
Resumo: | This article goes beyond the study of speech acts to investigate the process of securitization during a health crisis. The article introduces the concept of ‘expert-led securitization’ to account for situations when experts dominate the administrative process that translates a securitizing speech act into extraordinary public policy. Expert-led securitization was particularly salient during the 2009 pandemic flu in Denmark and Sweden. Autonomous public health expert agencies led the national securitization processes, and these never included intense political battles or extensive public debates. In turn, the respective processes resulted in different policies: Sweden’s main response to the pandemic was an extraordinary push to vaccinate its whole population, while Denmark’s was a one-off offer of vaccination to about twenty percent of its people. Hence, the 2009 pandemic example illustrates the added value of investigating the administrative dynamics of securitization when seeking to understand differences in extraordinary policies. |
id |
RCAP_85632c306ac52c7c66380bea6945f667 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2982 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Expert-Led Securitization: The Case of the 2009 Pandemic in Denmark and SwedenCopenhagen School; Denmark; evidence; experts; extraordinary responses; H1N1; health crisis; pandemic; securitization; SwedenThis article goes beyond the study of speech acts to investigate the process of securitization during a health crisis. The article introduces the concept of ‘expert-led securitization’ to account for situations when experts dominate the administrative process that translates a securitizing speech act into extraordinary public policy. Expert-led securitization was particularly salient during the 2009 pandemic flu in Denmark and Sweden. Autonomous public health expert agencies led the national securitization processes, and these never included intense political battles or extensive public debates. In turn, the respective processes resulted in different policies: Sweden’s main response to the pandemic was an extraordinary push to vaccinate its whole population, while Denmark’s was a one-off offer of vaccination to about twenty percent of its people. Hence, the 2009 pandemic example illustrates the added value of investigating the administrative dynamics of securitization when seeking to understand differences in extraordinary policies.Cogitatio2020-12-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.2982oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2982Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): The Politics of Disaster Governance; 319-3302183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2982https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.2982https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2982/2982Copyright (c) 2020 Olivier Rubin, Erik Baekkeskovhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRubin, OlivierBaekkeskov, Erik2022-12-22T15:16:28Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2982Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:24.933558Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Expert-Led Securitization: The Case of the 2009 Pandemic in Denmark and Sweden |
title |
Expert-Led Securitization: The Case of the 2009 Pandemic in Denmark and Sweden |
spellingShingle |
Expert-Led Securitization: The Case of the 2009 Pandemic in Denmark and Sweden Rubin, Olivier Copenhagen School; Denmark; evidence; experts; extraordinary responses; H1N1; health crisis; pandemic; securitization; Sweden |
title_short |
Expert-Led Securitization: The Case of the 2009 Pandemic in Denmark and Sweden |
title_full |
Expert-Led Securitization: The Case of the 2009 Pandemic in Denmark and Sweden |
title_fullStr |
Expert-Led Securitization: The Case of the 2009 Pandemic in Denmark and Sweden |
title_full_unstemmed |
Expert-Led Securitization: The Case of the 2009 Pandemic in Denmark and Sweden |
title_sort |
Expert-Led Securitization: The Case of the 2009 Pandemic in Denmark and Sweden |
author |
Rubin, Olivier |
author_facet |
Rubin, Olivier Baekkeskov, Erik |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Baekkeskov, Erik |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rubin, Olivier Baekkeskov, Erik |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Copenhagen School; Denmark; evidence; experts; extraordinary responses; H1N1; health crisis; pandemic; securitization; Sweden |
topic |
Copenhagen School; Denmark; evidence; experts; extraordinary responses; H1N1; health crisis; pandemic; securitization; Sweden |
description |
This article goes beyond the study of speech acts to investigate the process of securitization during a health crisis. The article introduces the concept of ‘expert-led securitization’ to account for situations when experts dominate the administrative process that translates a securitizing speech act into extraordinary public policy. Expert-led securitization was particularly salient during the 2009 pandemic flu in Denmark and Sweden. Autonomous public health expert agencies led the national securitization processes, and these never included intense political battles or extensive public debates. In turn, the respective processes resulted in different policies: Sweden’s main response to the pandemic was an extraordinary push to vaccinate its whole population, while Denmark’s was a one-off offer of vaccination to about twenty percent of its people. Hence, the 2009 pandemic example illustrates the added value of investigating the administrative dynamics of securitization when seeking to understand differences in extraordinary policies. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-10 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.2982 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2982 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.2982 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2982 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2982 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.2982 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2982/2982 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Olivier Rubin, Erik Baekkeskov http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Olivier Rubin, Erik Baekkeskov http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): The Politics of Disaster Governance; 319-330 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130669631143936 |