Cultural conceptions of morality: examining laypeople’s associations of moral character
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/8139 |
Resumo: | Whether moral conceptions are universal or culture-specific is controversial in moral psychology. One option is to refrain from imposing theoretical constraints and to ask laypeople from different cultures how they conceptualize morality. Our article adopts this approach by examining laypeople's associations of moral character in individualistic- and collectivistic-oriented cultures. Using correspondence analysis we found that the concept of moral character yielded widely shared associations with justice and welfare concerns. Yet, there were also clear cultural differences with individualistic-oriented samples associating more frequently rights-based features and collectivistic-oriented samples more frequently associating duty-based attributes. When matching freelisted trait categories with Schwartz's value types, moral value hierarchies were similar across cultures and correlated significantly with explicit moral value ratings. We conclude that imposing constraints through an expert-designed category system can narrow the scope of inquiry to common moral aspects related to problem-solving, promotion of prosocial actions and control of antisocial behaviour. |
id |
RCAP_858bb70a7aaeb1bb7ccb10d65bd6241f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/8139 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Cultural conceptions of morality: examining laypeople’s associations of moral characterFreelistingsValuesCorrespondence analysisCultureMoralityWhether moral conceptions are universal or culture-specific is controversial in moral psychology. One option is to refrain from imposing theoretical constraints and to ask laypeople from different cultures how they conceptualize morality. Our article adopts this approach by examining laypeople's associations of moral character in individualistic- and collectivistic-oriented cultures. Using correspondence analysis we found that the concept of moral character yielded widely shared associations with justice and welfare concerns. Yet, there were also clear cultural differences with individualistic-oriented samples associating more frequently rights-based features and collectivistic-oriented samples more frequently associating duty-based attributes. When matching freelisted trait categories with Schwartz's value types, moral value hierarchies were similar across cultures and correlated significantly with explicit moral value ratings. We conclude that imposing constraints through an expert-designed category system can narrow the scope of inquiry to common moral aspects related to problem-solving, promotion of prosocial actions and control of antisocial behaviour.Routledge/Taylor and Francis2014-12-15T11:34:46Z2014-01-01T00:00:00Z20142019-05-21T10:24:13Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/8139eng0305-724010.1080/03057240.2013.873365Vauclair, C.-M.Wilson, M.Fischer, R.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:29:02Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/8139Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:13:00.238210Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Cultural conceptions of morality: examining laypeople’s associations of moral character |
title |
Cultural conceptions of morality: examining laypeople’s associations of moral character |
spellingShingle |
Cultural conceptions of morality: examining laypeople’s associations of moral character Vauclair, C.-M. Freelistings Values Correspondence analysis Culture Morality |
title_short |
Cultural conceptions of morality: examining laypeople’s associations of moral character |
title_full |
Cultural conceptions of morality: examining laypeople’s associations of moral character |
title_fullStr |
Cultural conceptions of morality: examining laypeople’s associations of moral character |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cultural conceptions of morality: examining laypeople’s associations of moral character |
title_sort |
Cultural conceptions of morality: examining laypeople’s associations of moral character |
author |
Vauclair, C.-M. |
author_facet |
Vauclair, C.-M. Wilson, M. Fischer, R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Wilson, M. Fischer, R. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vauclair, C.-M. Wilson, M. Fischer, R. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Freelistings Values Correspondence analysis Culture Morality |
topic |
Freelistings Values Correspondence analysis Culture Morality |
description |
Whether moral conceptions are universal or culture-specific is controversial in moral psychology. One option is to refrain from imposing theoretical constraints and to ask laypeople from different cultures how they conceptualize morality. Our article adopts this approach by examining laypeople's associations of moral character in individualistic- and collectivistic-oriented cultures. Using correspondence analysis we found that the concept of moral character yielded widely shared associations with justice and welfare concerns. Yet, there were also clear cultural differences with individualistic-oriented samples associating more frequently rights-based features and collectivistic-oriented samples more frequently associating duty-based attributes. When matching freelisted trait categories with Schwartz's value types, moral value hierarchies were similar across cultures and correlated significantly with explicit moral value ratings. We conclude that imposing constraints through an expert-designed category system can narrow the scope of inquiry to common moral aspects related to problem-solving, promotion of prosocial actions and control of antisocial behaviour. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-15T11:34:46Z 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z 2014 2019-05-21T10:24:13Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/8139 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/8139 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0305-7240 10.1080/03057240.2013.873365 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Routledge/Taylor and Francis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Routledge/Taylor and Francis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134685945659392 |