The US and NATO Expansion: Fulfilling a Domestic Political Agenda
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-2078.RPCP2019.11/pp.13-34 |
Resumo: | The expansion of NATO has certainly been a very controversial issue that still sees the world divided into supporters and opponents. Various reasons have been brought forward to justify why the NATO enlargement decision was taken, inter alia the securitisation and stabilisation of Europe, the democratisation of the countries formerly under the Soviet yoke or the enhancement of the Alliance’s effectiveness and cohesion. Although all such propositions might be valid, this article wants to analyse if indeed, as often claimed, the US decision to enlarge NATO responded first and foremost to realpolitik considerations, and namely if it is true that enlargement addressed specific US’s domestic political concerns that had their expression also in foreign policy initiatives, and more specifically if President Clinton used NATO enlargement to enhance his chances of re-election. The study conducted demonstrates that it was indeed so and that President Clinton could have not possibly followed a different policy. Without the firm US commitment to expand NATO, the enlargement of the Alliance would have probably never taken place. |
id |
RCAP_85b7790374f4578af132790039b9aaa5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.rpcp.pt:article/37 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The US and NATO Expansion: Fulfilling a Domestic Political AgendaNATO ExpansionNeorealismRational ChoiceRealpolitikThe expansion of NATO has certainly been a very controversial issue that still sees the world divided into supporters and opponents. Various reasons have been brought forward to justify why the NATO enlargement decision was taken, inter alia the securitisation and stabilisation of Europe, the democratisation of the countries formerly under the Soviet yoke or the enhancement of the Alliance’s effectiveness and cohesion. Although all such propositions might be valid, this article wants to analyse if indeed, as often claimed, the US decision to enlarge NATO responded first and foremost to realpolitik considerations, and namely if it is true that enlargement addressed specific US’s domestic political concerns that had their expression also in foreign policy initiatives, and more specifically if President Clinton used NATO enlargement to enhance his chances of re-election. The study conducted demonstrates that it was indeed so and that President Clinton could have not possibly followed a different policy. Without the firm US commitment to expand NATO, the enlargement of the Alliance would have probably never taken place.Observatório Político2019-09-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.33167/2184-2078.RPCP2019.11/pp.13-34https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-2078.RPCP2019.11/pp.13-34Political Observer | Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Política (Portuguese Journal of Political Science); No. 11 (2019); 13-342795-47652795-4757reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://rpcp.pt/index.php/rpcp/article/view/37https://rpcp.pt/index.php/rpcp/article/view/37/25Ranise, Lucainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-10T07:49:52Zoai:ojs2.rpcp.pt:article/37Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:48:35.402990Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The US and NATO Expansion: Fulfilling a Domestic Political Agenda |
title |
The US and NATO Expansion: Fulfilling a Domestic Political Agenda |
spellingShingle |
The US and NATO Expansion: Fulfilling a Domestic Political Agenda Ranise, Luca NATO Expansion Neorealism Rational Choice Realpolitik |
title_short |
The US and NATO Expansion: Fulfilling a Domestic Political Agenda |
title_full |
The US and NATO Expansion: Fulfilling a Domestic Political Agenda |
title_fullStr |
The US and NATO Expansion: Fulfilling a Domestic Political Agenda |
title_full_unstemmed |
The US and NATO Expansion: Fulfilling a Domestic Political Agenda |
title_sort |
The US and NATO Expansion: Fulfilling a Domestic Political Agenda |
author |
Ranise, Luca |
author_facet |
Ranise, Luca |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ranise, Luca |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
NATO Expansion Neorealism Rational Choice Realpolitik |
topic |
NATO Expansion Neorealism Rational Choice Realpolitik |
description |
The expansion of NATO has certainly been a very controversial issue that still sees the world divided into supporters and opponents. Various reasons have been brought forward to justify why the NATO enlargement decision was taken, inter alia the securitisation and stabilisation of Europe, the democratisation of the countries formerly under the Soviet yoke or the enhancement of the Alliance’s effectiveness and cohesion. Although all such propositions might be valid, this article wants to analyse if indeed, as often claimed, the US decision to enlarge NATO responded first and foremost to realpolitik considerations, and namely if it is true that enlargement addressed specific US’s domestic political concerns that had their expression also in foreign policy initiatives, and more specifically if President Clinton used NATO enlargement to enhance his chances of re-election. The study conducted demonstrates that it was indeed so and that President Clinton could have not possibly followed a different policy. Without the firm US commitment to expand NATO, the enlargement of the Alliance would have probably never taken place. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-18 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-2078.RPCP2019.11/pp.13-34 https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-2078.RPCP2019.11/pp.13-34 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-2078.RPCP2019.11/pp.13-34 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rpcp.pt/index.php/rpcp/article/view/37 https://rpcp.pt/index.php/rpcp/article/view/37/25 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Observatório Político |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Observatório Político |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Political Observer | Revista Portuguesa de Ciência Política (Portuguese Journal of Political Science); No. 11 (2019); 13-34 2795-4765 2795-4757 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130351687172096 |