User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597 |
Resumo: | In this study, we explored the role of people with mild forms of visual, hearing, physical, and cognitive impairments in innovation processes. Our research questions are: do the product evaluations by people with mild disabilities differ from those given by people without reported disabilities? If so, how? The analysis is based on eight focus group interviews conducted in Norway in 2016, in which 60 participants were asked to evaluate 11 energy-efficient product ideas. Four of the focus groups (two of men and two of women) were recruited based on the criteria of being mildly disabled. The remaining groups (two of men and two of women) had no such clause. The research results are ambiguous, indicating that the evaluations of new innovation by mildly disabled people correspond with those made by people without reported disabilities in some aspects and differ in others. However, the small size of the sample studied in this article suggests that the research results must be regarded as preliminary. Overall, the study reveals some interesting observations to be confirmed and disconfirmed in further research. |
id |
RCAP_86c136f570ef314353495ff715f67312 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1597 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?disability; energy products; focus group; innovations; product-evaluationIn this study, we explored the role of people with mild forms of visual, hearing, physical, and cognitive impairments in innovation processes. Our research questions are: do the product evaluations by people with mild disabilities differ from those given by people without reported disabilities? If so, how? The analysis is based on eight focus group interviews conducted in Norway in 2016, in which 60 participants were asked to evaluate 11 energy-efficient product ideas. Four of the focus groups (two of men and two of women) were recruited based on the criteria of being mildly disabled. The remaining groups (two of men and two of women) had no such clause. The research results are ambiguous, indicating that the evaluations of new innovation by mildly disabled people correspond with those made by people without reported disabilities in some aspects and differ in others. However, the small size of the sample studied in this article suggests that the research results must be regarded as preliminary. Overall, the study reveals some interesting observations to be confirmed and disconfirmed in further research.Cogitatio2019-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1597Social Inclusion; Vol 7, No 1 (2019): People with Disabilities: The Overlooked Consumers; 136-1512183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1597https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1597/1597Copyright (c) 2019 Anita Borch, Pål Strandbakkenhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorch, AnitaStrandbakken, Pål2022-12-20T10:58:44Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1597Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:18.341046Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference? |
title |
User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference? |
spellingShingle |
User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference? Borch, Anita disability; energy products; focus group; innovations; product-evaluation |
title_short |
User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference? |
title_full |
User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference? |
title_fullStr |
User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference? |
title_full_unstemmed |
User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference? |
title_sort |
User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference? |
author |
Borch, Anita |
author_facet |
Borch, Anita Strandbakken, Pål |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Strandbakken, Pål |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borch, Anita Strandbakken, Pål |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
disability; energy products; focus group; innovations; product-evaluation |
topic |
disability; energy products; focus group; innovations; product-evaluation |
description |
In this study, we explored the role of people with mild forms of visual, hearing, physical, and cognitive impairments in innovation processes. Our research questions are: do the product evaluations by people with mild disabilities differ from those given by people without reported disabilities? If so, how? The analysis is based on eight focus group interviews conducted in Norway in 2016, in which 60 participants were asked to evaluate 11 energy-efficient product ideas. Four of the focus groups (two of men and two of women) were recruited based on the criteria of being mildly disabled. The remaining groups (two of men and two of women) had no such clause. The research results are ambiguous, indicating that the evaluations of new innovation by mildly disabled people correspond with those made by people without reported disabilities in some aspects and differ in others. However, the small size of the sample studied in this article suggests that the research results must be regarded as preliminary. Overall, the study reveals some interesting observations to be confirmed and disconfirmed in further research. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1597 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1597 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1597 https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1597/1597 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Anita Borch, Pål Strandbakken http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Anita Borch, Pål Strandbakken http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Inclusion; Vol 7, No 1 (2019): People with Disabilities: The Overlooked Consumers; 136-151 2183-2803 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130660223320064 |