User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borch, Anita
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Strandbakken, Pål
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597
Resumo: In this study, we explored the role of people with mild forms of visual, hearing, physical, and cognitive impairments in innovation processes. Our research questions are: do the product evaluations by people with mild disabilities differ from those given by people without reported disabilities? If so, how? The analysis is based on eight focus group interviews conducted in Norway in 2016, in which 60 participants were asked to evaluate 11 energy-efficient product ideas. Four of the focus groups (two of men and two of women) were recruited based on the criteria of being mildly disabled. The remaining groups (two of men and two of women) had no such clause. The research results are ambiguous, indicating that the evaluations of new innovation by mildly disabled people correspond with those made by people without reported disabilities in some aspects and differ in others. However, the small size of the sample studied in this article suggests that the research results must be regarded as preliminary. Overall, the study reveals some interesting observations to be confirmed and disconfirmed in further research.
id RCAP_86c136f570ef314353495ff715f67312
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1597
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?disability; energy products; focus group; innovations; product-evaluationIn this study, we explored the role of people with mild forms of visual, hearing, physical, and cognitive impairments in innovation processes. Our research questions are: do the product evaluations by people with mild disabilities differ from those given by people without reported disabilities? If so, how? The analysis is based on eight focus group interviews conducted in Norway in 2016, in which 60 participants were asked to evaluate 11 energy-efficient product ideas. Four of the focus groups (two of men and two of women) were recruited based on the criteria of being mildly disabled. The remaining groups (two of men and two of women) had no such clause. The research results are ambiguous, indicating that the evaluations of new innovation by mildly disabled people correspond with those made by people without reported disabilities in some aspects and differ in others. However, the small size of the sample studied in this article suggests that the research results must be regarded as preliminary. Overall, the study reveals some interesting observations to be confirmed and disconfirmed in further research.Cogitatio2019-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1597Social Inclusion; Vol 7, No 1 (2019): People with Disabilities: The Overlooked Consumers; 136-1512183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1597https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1597/1597Copyright (c) 2019 Anita Borch, Pål Strandbakkenhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorch, AnitaStrandbakken, Pål2022-12-20T10:58:44Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1597Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:18.341046Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?
title User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?
spellingShingle User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?
Borch, Anita
disability; energy products; focus group; innovations; product-evaluation
title_short User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?
title_full User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?
title_fullStr User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?
title_full_unstemmed User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?
title_sort User Involvement of People with Mild Disabilities in Technology Innovations: Does It Make a Difference?
author Borch, Anita
author_facet Borch, Anita
Strandbakken, Pål
author_role author
author2 Strandbakken, Pål
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borch, Anita
Strandbakken, Pål
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv disability; energy products; focus group; innovations; product-evaluation
topic disability; energy products; focus group; innovations; product-evaluation
description In this study, we explored the role of people with mild forms of visual, hearing, physical, and cognitive impairments in innovation processes. Our research questions are: do the product evaluations by people with mild disabilities differ from those given by people without reported disabilities? If so, how? The analysis is based on eight focus group interviews conducted in Norway in 2016, in which 60 participants were asked to evaluate 11 energy-efficient product ideas. Four of the focus groups (two of men and two of women) were recruited based on the criteria of being mildly disabled. The remaining groups (two of men and two of women) had no such clause. The research results are ambiguous, indicating that the evaluations of new innovation by mildly disabled people correspond with those made by people without reported disabilities in some aspects and differ in others. However, the small size of the sample studied in this article suggests that the research results must be regarded as preliminary. Overall, the study reveals some interesting observations to be confirmed and disconfirmed in further research.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1597
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1597
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1597
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1597
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1597/1597
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Anita Borch, Pål Strandbakken
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Anita Borch, Pål Strandbakken
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 7, No 1 (2019): People with Disabilities: The Overlooked Consumers; 136-151
2183-2803
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130660223320064