Why enforced disappearances are perpetrated against groups as state policy: overlaps and interconnections between disappearances and genocide

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sarkin, Jeremy
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Baranowska, Grażyna
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.9098
Resumo: This article examines the connection between groups and disappearances. It argues that often those targeted for disappearance are from a group, particularly minority or indigenous groups of some description. The article argues that enforced disappearances are used as a systematic method of oppression in many countries, and that specific groups are particularly affected by this practice. Their different ethnic, cultural and/or linguistic identity and political aspirations are reasons why these groups are viewed as ‘sources of contestation’, which is why they become prime targets for governments. The goals that such groups are often trying to ensure include: greater democratization, ending discrimination against the group, trying to ensure that a specific resource is not taken from the group, or another similar objective. The article further argues that understanding the “group dimension” of enforced disappearances should ensure that more could be done to both prevent and react to disappearances. This is important, since if there is a better understanding that members of a certain minority are at risk of disappearing, they can be better protected. The article also examines the interconnection between enforced disappearances and genocide. It does this partly because in practice these acts target similar persons. While genocide is defined as being perpetrated against specific groups, enforced disappearances are not defined as targeting groups being a necessary aspect of the crime. However, as the article argues, enforced disappearances are often perpetrated against members of specific groups, particularly minorities or indigenous groups. Genocide is a crime that inherently targets groups, even though – as long as there is intent to destroy a group of people in whole or in part – it could consist of killing a single person. While disappearances can be and often take place on a large scale (and may then be classified as crimes against humanity), they are usually considered individually on a case-by-case basis. This research seeks to understand how disappearances are a popular tool for the control and disruption of a subjugated population, and may be the strategy of choice for a government that is unwilling or unable to commit genocide (or crimes against humanity) against such groups. The article argues that state authorities that aim at dissuading specific groups from their goals, or target them for whatever other reason, but do not want to conduct genocide against them, often wage a campaign of disappearances. Thus, rather than wiping out the group the state uses disappearances as a means to intimidate and harass a group, to achieve some specific outcome. In its final section, the article examines what can be done to deal with and try and prevent disappearances aimed specifically at groups. A variety of suggestions are made as to what can be done to prevent such disappearances as well as to how to deal with them when they do occur.
id RCAP_86d5d56592acbfaa8239b56cd6298ab7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/9098
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Why enforced disappearances are perpetrated against groups as state policy: overlaps and interconnections between disappearances and genocideThis article examines the connection between groups and disappearances. It argues that often those targeted for disappearance are from a group, particularly minority or indigenous groups of some description. The article argues that enforced disappearances are used as a systematic method of oppression in many countries, and that specific groups are particularly affected by this practice. Their different ethnic, cultural and/or linguistic identity and political aspirations are reasons why these groups are viewed as ‘sources of contestation’, which is why they become prime targets for governments. The goals that such groups are often trying to ensure include: greater democratization, ending discrimination against the group, trying to ensure that a specific resource is not taken from the group, or another similar objective. The article further argues that understanding the “group dimension” of enforced disappearances should ensure that more could be done to both prevent and react to disappearances. This is important, since if there is a better understanding that members of a certain minority are at risk of disappearing, they can be better protected. The article also examines the interconnection between enforced disappearances and genocide. It does this partly because in practice these acts target similar persons. While genocide is defined as being perpetrated against specific groups, enforced disappearances are not defined as targeting groups being a necessary aspect of the crime. However, as the article argues, enforced disappearances are often perpetrated against members of specific groups, particularly minorities or indigenous groups. Genocide is a crime that inherently targets groups, even though – as long as there is intent to destroy a group of people in whole or in part – it could consist of killing a single person. While disappearances can be and often take place on a large scale (and may then be classified as crimes against humanity), they are usually considered individually on a case-by-case basis. This research seeks to understand how disappearances are a popular tool for the control and disruption of a subjugated population, and may be the strategy of choice for a government that is unwilling or unable to commit genocide (or crimes against humanity) against such groups. The article argues that state authorities that aim at dissuading specific groups from their goals, or target them for whatever other reason, but do not want to conduct genocide against them, often wage a campaign of disappearances. Thus, rather than wiping out the group the state uses disappearances as a means to intimidate and harass a group, to achieve some specific outcome. In its final section, the article examines what can be done to deal with and try and prevent disappearances aimed specifically at groups. A variety of suggestions are made as to what can be done to prevent such disappearances as well as to how to deal with them when they do occur.Este artigo analisa a ligação entre comunidades e desaparecimentos. Argumenta-se que muitas vezes as vítimas de desaparecimentos pertencem a uma comunidade, particularmente a minorias ou grupos indígenas de algum tipo. O artigo defende que desaparecimentos provocados são utilizados enquanto método de opressão sistemática em muitos países, nos quais grupos de pessoas específicos são particularmente afetados. As suas identidades étnicas, culturais e/ou linguísticas, bem como as suas aspirações políticas servem como fundamento para estes grupos serem considerados como “fontes de contestação”, o que explica o porquê destes grupos serem os principais alvos dos vários Governos. Os objetivos que esses grupos tentam muitas vezes assegurar incluem: uma maior democratização, o fim da descriminação contra o grupo em causa, uma tentativa de impedir que certo recurso seja retirado ao grupo, ou outro objetivo semelhante. O artigo também defende que a perceção correta da “dimensão de grupo” dos desaparecimentos provocados irá assegurar que se poderá fazer mais para não só prevenir, como também para reagir a estes desaparecimentos. Isto é importante, já que se existe uma maior perceção de que membros de uma certa minoria estão em risco de desaparecer, estes podem ser melhor protegidos. O artigo também examina a interligação entre os desaparecimentos forçados e o genocídio. Esta análise é devida em parte porque ambos os atos têm como alvo pessoas semelhantes. Enquanto o genocídio é definido enquanto sendo perpetrado contra grupos de pessoas específicos, os desaparecimentos provocados não implicam a persecução de grupos enquanto elemento necessário do crime. No entanto, tal como o artigo sustenta, desaparecimentos provocados são muitas vezes perpetrados contra membros de grupos específicos, particularmente minorias ou grupos indígenas. O genocídio é um crime que tem inerentemente como alvo grupos, ainda que – enquanto houver intenção de destruir um grupo de pessoas, no todo ou em parte – possa consistir em matar uma única pessoa. Enquanto desaparecimentos podem e muitas vezes são efetuados numa proporção maior (podendo aí ser classificados como crimes contra a Humanidade), eles são normalmente tratados individual e casuisticamente. Esta investigação visa perceber como os desaparecimentos forçados são uma ferramenta popular para controlar e destabilizar uma população subjugada, e como estes poderão ser a estratégia de eleição para um governo que não quer ou não pode cometer o genocídio (ou crimes contra a Humanidade) contra esses grupos. O artigo sustenta que as autoridades públicas que têm como objetivo dissuadir grupos específicos dos seus objetivos, ou persegui-las por qualquer outra razão, mas que não queiram conduzir atos de genocídio contra eles, conduzem muitas vezes campanhas de desaparecimentos. Assim, em vez de eliminar o grupo, o Estado utiliza desaparecimentos como meio de intimidar e perseguir um grupo, de modo a alcançar um resultado específico. O artigo examina, na sua secção final, o que poderá ser feito para lidar com e para tentar prevenir desaparecimentos apontados especificamente a grupos. É feito um conjunto de sugestões relativamente ao que poderá ser feito para prevenir esses desaparecimentos, bem como relativamente a o que se poderá fazer para lidar com eles quando ocorrerem.Universidade Católica Portuguesa2018-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.9098https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.9098Católica Law Review; Vol 2 No 3 (2018): Criminal law; 11-50Católica Law Review; v. 2 n. 3 (2018): Direito penal; 11-502184-03342183-933610.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.2.3reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/9098https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/9098/8964Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Jeremy Sarkin, Grażyna Baranowskahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSarkin, JeremyBaranowska, Grażyna2023-10-03T15:41:12Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/9098Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:32:47.303373Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why enforced disappearances are perpetrated against groups as state policy: overlaps and interconnections between disappearances and genocide
title Why enforced disappearances are perpetrated against groups as state policy: overlaps and interconnections between disappearances and genocide
spellingShingle Why enforced disappearances are perpetrated against groups as state policy: overlaps and interconnections between disappearances and genocide
Sarkin, Jeremy
title_short Why enforced disappearances are perpetrated against groups as state policy: overlaps and interconnections between disappearances and genocide
title_full Why enforced disappearances are perpetrated against groups as state policy: overlaps and interconnections between disappearances and genocide
title_fullStr Why enforced disappearances are perpetrated against groups as state policy: overlaps and interconnections between disappearances and genocide
title_full_unstemmed Why enforced disappearances are perpetrated against groups as state policy: overlaps and interconnections between disappearances and genocide
title_sort Why enforced disappearances are perpetrated against groups as state policy: overlaps and interconnections between disappearances and genocide
author Sarkin, Jeremy
author_facet Sarkin, Jeremy
Baranowska, Grażyna
author_role author
author2 Baranowska, Grażyna
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sarkin, Jeremy
Baranowska, Grażyna
description This article examines the connection between groups and disappearances. It argues that often those targeted for disappearance are from a group, particularly minority or indigenous groups of some description. The article argues that enforced disappearances are used as a systematic method of oppression in many countries, and that specific groups are particularly affected by this practice. Their different ethnic, cultural and/or linguistic identity and political aspirations are reasons why these groups are viewed as ‘sources of contestation’, which is why they become prime targets for governments. The goals that such groups are often trying to ensure include: greater democratization, ending discrimination against the group, trying to ensure that a specific resource is not taken from the group, or another similar objective. The article further argues that understanding the “group dimension” of enforced disappearances should ensure that more could be done to both prevent and react to disappearances. This is important, since if there is a better understanding that members of a certain minority are at risk of disappearing, they can be better protected. The article also examines the interconnection between enforced disappearances and genocide. It does this partly because in practice these acts target similar persons. While genocide is defined as being perpetrated against specific groups, enforced disappearances are not defined as targeting groups being a necessary aspect of the crime. However, as the article argues, enforced disappearances are often perpetrated against members of specific groups, particularly minorities or indigenous groups. Genocide is a crime that inherently targets groups, even though – as long as there is intent to destroy a group of people in whole or in part – it could consist of killing a single person. While disappearances can be and often take place on a large scale (and may then be classified as crimes against humanity), they are usually considered individually on a case-by-case basis. This research seeks to understand how disappearances are a popular tool for the control and disruption of a subjugated population, and may be the strategy of choice for a government that is unwilling or unable to commit genocide (or crimes against humanity) against such groups. The article argues that state authorities that aim at dissuading specific groups from their goals, or target them for whatever other reason, but do not want to conduct genocide against them, often wage a campaign of disappearances. Thus, rather than wiping out the group the state uses disappearances as a means to intimidate and harass a group, to achieve some specific outcome. In its final section, the article examines what can be done to deal with and try and prevent disappearances aimed specifically at groups. A variety of suggestions are made as to what can be done to prevent such disappearances as well as to how to deal with them when they do occur.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.9098
https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.9098
url https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.9098
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/9098
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/9098/8964
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Jeremy Sarkin, Grażyna Baranowska
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2018 Jeremy Sarkin, Grażyna Baranowska
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Portuguesa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Católica Law Review; Vol 2 No 3 (2018): Criminal law; 11-50
Católica Law Review; v. 2 n. 3 (2018): Direito penal; 11-50
2184-0334
2183-9336
10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.2.3
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133593661865984