Dealing with the facts of life: the management of intra-party factionalism in the Iberian radical left parties
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/40436 |
Resumo: | Factionalism is an important element in parties' internal life, affecting their policies, strategies, electoral performance and even survival. Yet little is known about how parties manage factionalism. This study examines how radical left parties (RLPs) manage factionalism, drawing on a comparative case study of four RLPs – the Spanish Podemos and United Left (IU), and the Portuguese Left Bloc (BE) and Communist Party (PCP) – from 2010 to 2019. Drawing on original data collection, we find that parties adopt both formal and informal mechanisms to address factionalism. However, their approaches differ significantly. We identify two main approaches towards factionalism: a permissive approach, which allows internal pluralism, in the BE and IU; and a prohibitionist approach, which actively fights factionalism, in Podemos and the PCP, with competitive prohibitionism in the former and pre-emptive prohibitionism in the latter. These approaches strongly correlate with parties' origins and political orientation, but neither fully prevents intra-party conflict or splintering. |
id |
RCAP_871bbae3af3161f7aad80bc8d7e768c1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/40436 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Dealing with the facts of life: the management of intra-party factionalism in the Iberian radical left partiesRadical left partiesFactionalismParty organizationParty managementIntra-party politicsFar leftFactionalism is an important element in parties' internal life, affecting their policies, strategies, electoral performance and even survival. Yet little is known about how parties manage factionalism. This study examines how radical left parties (RLPs) manage factionalism, drawing on a comparative case study of four RLPs – the Spanish Podemos and United Left (IU), and the Portuguese Left Bloc (BE) and Communist Party (PCP) – from 2010 to 2019. Drawing on original data collection, we find that parties adopt both formal and informal mechanisms to address factionalism. However, their approaches differ significantly. We identify two main approaches towards factionalism: a permissive approach, which allows internal pluralism, in the BE and IU; and a prohibitionist approach, which actively fights factionalism, in Podemos and the PCP, with competitive prohibitionism in the former and pre-emptive prohibitionism in the latter. These approaches strongly correlate with parties' origins and political orientation, but neither fully prevents intra-party conflict or splintering.Cambridge University Press2024-01-31T15:29:16Z2024-01-10T00:00:00Z2024-01-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/40436eng0017-257X10.1017/gov.2023.9Lourenço, PedroConceição, TiagoJalali, Carlosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-22T12:18:19Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/40436Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:10:09.266414Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dealing with the facts of life: the management of intra-party factionalism in the Iberian radical left parties |
title |
Dealing with the facts of life: the management of intra-party factionalism in the Iberian radical left parties |
spellingShingle |
Dealing with the facts of life: the management of intra-party factionalism in the Iberian radical left parties Lourenço, Pedro Radical left parties Factionalism Party organization Party management Intra-party politics Far left |
title_short |
Dealing with the facts of life: the management of intra-party factionalism in the Iberian radical left parties |
title_full |
Dealing with the facts of life: the management of intra-party factionalism in the Iberian radical left parties |
title_fullStr |
Dealing with the facts of life: the management of intra-party factionalism in the Iberian radical left parties |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dealing with the facts of life: the management of intra-party factionalism in the Iberian radical left parties |
title_sort |
Dealing with the facts of life: the management of intra-party factionalism in the Iberian radical left parties |
author |
Lourenço, Pedro |
author_facet |
Lourenço, Pedro Conceição, Tiago Jalali, Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Conceição, Tiago Jalali, Carlos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lourenço, Pedro Conceição, Tiago Jalali, Carlos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Radical left parties Factionalism Party organization Party management Intra-party politics Far left |
topic |
Radical left parties Factionalism Party organization Party management Intra-party politics Far left |
description |
Factionalism is an important element in parties' internal life, affecting their policies, strategies, electoral performance and even survival. Yet little is known about how parties manage factionalism. This study examines how radical left parties (RLPs) manage factionalism, drawing on a comparative case study of four RLPs – the Spanish Podemos and United Left (IU), and the Portuguese Left Bloc (BE) and Communist Party (PCP) – from 2010 to 2019. Drawing on original data collection, we find that parties adopt both formal and informal mechanisms to address factionalism. However, their approaches differ significantly. We identify two main approaches towards factionalism: a permissive approach, which allows internal pluralism, in the BE and IU; and a prohibitionist approach, which actively fights factionalism, in Podemos and the PCP, with competitive prohibitionism in the former and pre-emptive prohibitionism in the latter. These approaches strongly correlate with parties' origins and political orientation, but neither fully prevents intra-party conflict or splintering. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-31T15:29:16Z 2024-01-10T00:00:00Z 2024-01-10 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/40436 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/40436 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0017-257X 10.1017/gov.2023.9 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cambridge University Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cambridge University Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137751806771200 |