The Side Effect of Political Standing: Corporate Activism and Its Impact on Stock Returns
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6306 |
Resumo: | Taking sides on controversial political issues such as gun control, abortion, immigration, or diversity is increasingly common among large companies. What remains unclear, however, is whether this type of strategy—known as “corporate activism”—has positive or negative effects on these companies. The use of the concept of corporate activism on different variables affecting the companies is relatively recent. This article analyses the effect of corporate activism on the stock market performance of US companies through the analysis of the sample collected. Although there are some recent articles published on this topic, none of them measures the risk associated with the use of this type of strategy. For the development of the research, the well-known Fama–French modelling framework is applied to estimate the differences between companies that participate in corporate activism initiatives versus those that remain outside this strategy. The findings complement previous research showing that companies that use corporate activism have lower market risk than companies that do not engage in this type of strategy. These results can be useful in identifying the advantages and disadvantages of corporate activism initiatives and, in addition, they can also help companies to evaluate the use of corporate activism as a strategic tool and as a driver of social change. |
id |
RCAP_87304bb5a7bf96a6e327fa60205ce873 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6306 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The Side Effect of Political Standing: Corporate Activism and Its Impact on Stock Returnscorporate activism; corporate social advocacy; corporate social responsibility; firm valueTaking sides on controversial political issues such as gun control, abortion, immigration, or diversity is increasingly common among large companies. What remains unclear, however, is whether this type of strategy—known as “corporate activism”—has positive or negative effects on these companies. The use of the concept of corporate activism on different variables affecting the companies is relatively recent. This article analyses the effect of corporate activism on the stock market performance of US companies through the analysis of the sample collected. Although there are some recent articles published on this topic, none of them measures the risk associated with the use of this type of strategy. For the development of the research, the well-known Fama–French modelling framework is applied to estimate the differences between companies that participate in corporate activism initiatives versus those that remain outside this strategy. The findings complement previous research showing that companies that use corporate activism have lower market risk than companies that do not engage in this type of strategy. These results can be useful in identifying the advantages and disadvantages of corporate activism initiatives and, in addition, they can also help companies to evaluate the use of corporate activism as a strategic tool and as a driver of social change.Cogitatio Press2023-05-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6306https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6306Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 2 (2023): Hate Speech, Demonization, Polarization, and Political Social Responsibility; 138-1462183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6306https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6306/6306Copyright (c) 2023 Teresa Pintado Blanco, Teresa Pintado Blanco, Carlota Lopez-Aza, Carlota Lopez-Aza, Pablo Gutierrez, Pablo Gutierrezinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBlanco, Teresa PintadoLópez-Aza, CarlotaSánchez, JoaquínGutiérrez‐Rodríguez, Pablo2023-08-31T15:15:21Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6306Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:54:08.026711Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Side Effect of Political Standing: Corporate Activism and Its Impact on Stock Returns |
title |
The Side Effect of Political Standing: Corporate Activism and Its Impact on Stock Returns |
spellingShingle |
The Side Effect of Political Standing: Corporate Activism and Its Impact on Stock Returns Blanco, Teresa Pintado corporate activism; corporate social advocacy; corporate social responsibility; firm value |
title_short |
The Side Effect of Political Standing: Corporate Activism and Its Impact on Stock Returns |
title_full |
The Side Effect of Political Standing: Corporate Activism and Its Impact on Stock Returns |
title_fullStr |
The Side Effect of Political Standing: Corporate Activism and Its Impact on Stock Returns |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Side Effect of Political Standing: Corporate Activism and Its Impact on Stock Returns |
title_sort |
The Side Effect of Political Standing: Corporate Activism and Its Impact on Stock Returns |
author |
Blanco, Teresa Pintado |
author_facet |
Blanco, Teresa Pintado López-Aza, Carlota Sánchez, Joaquín Gutiérrez‐Rodríguez, Pablo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
López-Aza, Carlota Sánchez, Joaquín Gutiérrez‐Rodríguez, Pablo |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Blanco, Teresa Pintado López-Aza, Carlota Sánchez, Joaquín Gutiérrez‐Rodríguez, Pablo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
corporate activism; corporate social advocacy; corporate social responsibility; firm value |
topic |
corporate activism; corporate social advocacy; corporate social responsibility; firm value |
description |
Taking sides on controversial political issues such as gun control, abortion, immigration, or diversity is increasingly common among large companies. What remains unclear, however, is whether this type of strategy—known as “corporate activism”—has positive or negative effects on these companies. The use of the concept of corporate activism on different variables affecting the companies is relatively recent. This article analyses the effect of corporate activism on the stock market performance of US companies through the analysis of the sample collected. Although there are some recent articles published on this topic, none of them measures the risk associated with the use of this type of strategy. For the development of the research, the well-known Fama–French modelling framework is applied to estimate the differences between companies that participate in corporate activism initiatives versus those that remain outside this strategy. The findings complement previous research showing that companies that use corporate activism have lower market risk than companies that do not engage in this type of strategy. These results can be useful in identifying the advantages and disadvantages of corporate activism initiatives and, in addition, they can also help companies to evaluate the use of corporate activism as a strategic tool and as a driver of social change. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-17 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6306 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6306 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6306 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6306 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6306/6306 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 11, No 2 (2023): Hate Speech, Demonization, Polarization, and Political Social Responsibility; 138-146 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131614294310912 |