Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bernhard, Laurent
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Kübler, Daniel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6051
Resumo: Despite the growing importance of new technologies, research on individual opinion formation in the digital domain is still in its infancy. This article empirically examines citizens’ use of social media in the context of direct democracy. Based on previous work, we expect men to form their opinions on social media more frequently than women (gender gap hypothesis). In the second step, we focus on the contextual level by examining the role campaigns play in reducing this discrepancy. More specifically, we hypothesize that the presumed gender gap narrows in accordance with the increasing intensity of public debates that precede ballots (interaction hypothesis). The empirical analysis draws on 13 post-ballot surveys held at Switzerland’s federal level from 2016 to 2020 and supports both the gender gap and the interaction hypotheses.
id RCAP_8745e1b4771ba450c24d7703a5067612
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6051
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?campaign; digitization; direct democracy; gender gap; media coverage; political communication; public debate; social media; SwitzerlandDespite the growing importance of new technologies, research on individual opinion formation in the digital domain is still in its infancy. This article empirically examines citizens’ use of social media in the context of direct democracy. Based on previous work, we expect men to form their opinions on social media more frequently than women (gender gap hypothesis). In the second step, we focus on the contextual level by examining the role campaigns play in reducing this discrepancy. More specifically, we hypothesize that the presumed gender gap narrows in accordance with the increasing intensity of public debates that precede ballots (interaction hypothesis). The empirical analysis draws on 13 post-ballot surveys held at Switzerland’s federal level from 2016 to 2020 and supports both the gender gap and the interaction hypotheses.Cogitatio Press2023-01-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6051https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6051Media and Communication; Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Referendum Campaigns in the Digital Age; 31-422183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6051https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6051/6051Copyright (c) 2023 Laurent Bernhard, Daniel Küblerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBernhard, LaurentKübler, Daniel2023-06-29T17:45:22Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6051Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:46:03.540986Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?
title Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?
spellingShingle Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?
Bernhard, Laurent
campaign; digitization; direct democracy; gender gap; media coverage; political communication; public debate; social media; Switzerland
title_short Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?
title_full Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?
title_fullStr Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?
title_full_unstemmed Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?
title_sort Do Intensive Public Debates on Direct-Democratic Ballots Narrow the Gender Gap in Social Media Use?
author Bernhard, Laurent
author_facet Bernhard, Laurent
Kübler, Daniel
author_role author
author2 Kübler, Daniel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bernhard, Laurent
Kübler, Daniel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv campaign; digitization; direct democracy; gender gap; media coverage; political communication; public debate; social media; Switzerland
topic campaign; digitization; direct democracy; gender gap; media coverage; political communication; public debate; social media; Switzerland
description Despite the growing importance of new technologies, research on individual opinion formation in the digital domain is still in its infancy. This article empirically examines citizens’ use of social media in the context of direct democracy. Based on previous work, we expect men to form their opinions on social media more frequently than women (gender gap hypothesis). In the second step, we focus on the contextual level by examining the role campaigns play in reducing this discrepancy. More specifically, we hypothesize that the presumed gender gap narrows in accordance with the increasing intensity of public debates that precede ballots (interaction hypothesis). The empirical analysis draws on 13 post-ballot surveys held at Switzerland’s federal level from 2016 to 2020 and supports both the gender gap and the interaction hypotheses.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6051
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6051
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6051
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6051
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6051/6051
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Laurent Bernhard, Daniel Kübler
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Laurent Bernhard, Daniel Kübler
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Referendum Campaigns in the Digital Age; 31-42
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130931558088704