Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: OSORIO, L.
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: LIMA, E., SOARES, J., AUTORINO, R., VERSOS, R., LHAMAS, A., MARCELO, F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/477
Resumo: Urology. 2007 Jan;69(1):27-31; discussion 31-3. Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not? Osorio L, Lima E, Soares J, Autorino R, Versos R, Lhamas A, Marcelo F. Department of Urology, Santo Antonio General Hospital, Oporto, Portugal. luis_osorio@netcabo.pt Abstract OBJECTIVES: To describe a single-center experience in the emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones. METHODS: We retrospectively considered the data from 144 patients (mean age 49.6 years, range 23 to 82) who had had obstructive ureteral stones and had undergone emergency ureteroscopy with stone retrieval. Intracorporeal pneumatic lithotripsy was performed when necessary. At the end of the procedure, a ureteral catheter was systematically left in place in 100 patients (69.4%) and removed within 24 hours. In the remaining 44 patients, a double-J stent was preferred and was removed within 30 days, depending on the clinical course. Stone-free status was defined as the complete absence of fragments at 1 month of follow-up. RESULTS: The calculi were more frequently localized in the distal ureter than in the proximal one (90.3% versus 9.7%, respectively). The overall mean stone diameter was 9.1 mm (range 5 to 20). The overall stone-free rate was 92.4%. A greater stone-free rate was obtained in those with stones less than 10 mm (95.8%) than in those with stones larger than 10 mm (89%, P = 0.002). Similarly, a significantly better outcome occurred for those with stones located in the distal ureter (94.6%) than for those with stones in the proximal one (71.4%, P = 0.004). The overall complication rate was 4.2%. The mean hospital stay was 2.5 days (range 1 to 7). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, emergency ureteroscopy in cases of obstructive ureteral stones proved to be safe and effective. It has the main advantage of offering both immediate relief from pain and stone fragmentation. Additional extensive studies are warranted to corroborate these findings. PMID: 17270606 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE
id RCAP_87b1461cb87fc5009dddb4bd35c372a2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/477
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not?Urology. 2007 Jan;69(1):27-31; discussion 31-3. Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not? Osorio L, Lima E, Soares J, Autorino R, Versos R, Lhamas A, Marcelo F. Department of Urology, Santo Antonio General Hospital, Oporto, Portugal. luis_osorio@netcabo.pt Abstract OBJECTIVES: To describe a single-center experience in the emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones. METHODS: We retrospectively considered the data from 144 patients (mean age 49.6 years, range 23 to 82) who had had obstructive ureteral stones and had undergone emergency ureteroscopy with stone retrieval. Intracorporeal pneumatic lithotripsy was performed when necessary. At the end of the procedure, a ureteral catheter was systematically left in place in 100 patients (69.4%) and removed within 24 hours. In the remaining 44 patients, a double-J stent was preferred and was removed within 30 days, depending on the clinical course. Stone-free status was defined as the complete absence of fragments at 1 month of follow-up. RESULTS: The calculi were more frequently localized in the distal ureter than in the proximal one (90.3% versus 9.7%, respectively). The overall mean stone diameter was 9.1 mm (range 5 to 20). The overall stone-free rate was 92.4%. A greater stone-free rate was obtained in those with stones less than 10 mm (95.8%) than in those with stones larger than 10 mm (89%, P = 0.002). Similarly, a significantly better outcome occurred for those with stones located in the distal ureter (94.6%) than for those with stones in the proximal one (71.4%, P = 0.004). The overall complication rate was 4.2%. The mean hospital stay was 2.5 days (range 1 to 7). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, emergency ureteroscopy in cases of obstructive ureteral stones proved to be safe and effective. It has the main advantage of offering both immediate relief from pain and stone fragmentation. Additional extensive studies are warranted to corroborate these findings. PMID: 17270606 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINEElsevierRepositório Científico do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo AntónioOSORIO, L.LIMA, E.SOARES, J.AUTORINO, R.VERSOS, R.LHAMAS, A.MARCELO, F.2010-10-27T09:26:30Z2007-012007-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/477eng0090-4295info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-20T10:52:42Zoai:repositorio.chporto.pt:10400.16/477Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:36:29.760037Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not?
title Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not?
spellingShingle Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not?
OSORIO, L.
title_short Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not?
title_full Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not?
title_fullStr Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not?
title_full_unstemmed Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not?
title_sort Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not?
author OSORIO, L.
author_facet OSORIO, L.
LIMA, E.
SOARES, J.
AUTORINO, R.
VERSOS, R.
LHAMAS, A.
MARCELO, F.
author_role author
author2 LIMA, E.
SOARES, J.
AUTORINO, R.
VERSOS, R.
LHAMAS, A.
MARCELO, F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv OSORIO, L.
LIMA, E.
SOARES, J.
AUTORINO, R.
VERSOS, R.
LHAMAS, A.
MARCELO, F.
description Urology. 2007 Jan;69(1):27-31; discussion 31-3. Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not? Osorio L, Lima E, Soares J, Autorino R, Versos R, Lhamas A, Marcelo F. Department of Urology, Santo Antonio General Hospital, Oporto, Portugal. luis_osorio@netcabo.pt Abstract OBJECTIVES: To describe a single-center experience in the emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones. METHODS: We retrospectively considered the data from 144 patients (mean age 49.6 years, range 23 to 82) who had had obstructive ureteral stones and had undergone emergency ureteroscopy with stone retrieval. Intracorporeal pneumatic lithotripsy was performed when necessary. At the end of the procedure, a ureteral catheter was systematically left in place in 100 patients (69.4%) and removed within 24 hours. In the remaining 44 patients, a double-J stent was preferred and was removed within 30 days, depending on the clinical course. Stone-free status was defined as the complete absence of fragments at 1 month of follow-up. RESULTS: The calculi were more frequently localized in the distal ureter than in the proximal one (90.3% versus 9.7%, respectively). The overall mean stone diameter was 9.1 mm (range 5 to 20). The overall stone-free rate was 92.4%. A greater stone-free rate was obtained in those with stones less than 10 mm (95.8%) than in those with stones larger than 10 mm (89%, P = 0.002). Similarly, a significantly better outcome occurred for those with stones located in the distal ureter (94.6%) than for those with stones in the proximal one (71.4%, P = 0.004). The overall complication rate was 4.2%. The mean hospital stay was 2.5 days (range 1 to 7). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, emergency ureteroscopy in cases of obstructive ureteral stones proved to be safe and effective. It has the main advantage of offering both immediate relief from pain and stone fragmentation. Additional extensive studies are warranted to corroborate these findings. PMID: 17270606 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-01
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z
2010-10-27T09:26:30Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/477
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.16/477
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0090-4295
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133628139044864