The Relevance of Language as a Predictor of the Will for Independence in Catalonia in 1996 and 2020

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Argelaguet, Jordi
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4531
Resumo: The Catalan secessionist parties, if added together, have won all the elections to the Parliament of Catalonia from 2010 to 2021. Their voters have been increasingly mobilized since the start of the controversial reform process of the Statute of Autonomy (2004–2010). The aim of this article is twofold. First, it intends to test whether language is the strongest predictor in preferring independence in two separate and distinct moments, 1996 and 2020. And second, to assess whether its strength has changed—and how—between both years. Only the most exogenous variables to the dependent variable are used in each of two logistic regressions to avoid problems of endogeneity: sex, age, size of town of residence, place of birth of the individual and of their parents, first language (L1), and educational level. Among them, L1 was—and still is—the most powerful predictor, although it is not entirely determinative. The secessionist movement not only gathers a plurality of Catalan native speakers, but it receives a not insignificant level of support among those who have Spanish as their L1. Conversely, the unionist group, despite being composed primarily by people who have Spanish as their L1 and have their family origins outside Catalonia, has a native Catalan-speaking minority inside. This imperfect division, which is based on ethnolinguistic alignments—and whose relevance cannot be neglected—alleviates the likelihood of an ethnic-based conflict.
id RCAP_885f24766219a8c32a7f52b4f88f2736
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4531
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The Relevance of Language as a Predictor of the Will for Independence in Catalonia in 1996 and 2020Catalonia; effective number of language groups; independence; language; logistic regression; secessionism; subjective national identityThe Catalan secessionist parties, if added together, have won all the elections to the Parliament of Catalonia from 2010 to 2021. Their voters have been increasingly mobilized since the start of the controversial reform process of the Statute of Autonomy (2004–2010). The aim of this article is twofold. First, it intends to test whether language is the strongest predictor in preferring independence in two separate and distinct moments, 1996 and 2020. And second, to assess whether its strength has changed—and how—between both years. Only the most exogenous variables to the dependent variable are used in each of two logistic regressions to avoid problems of endogeneity: sex, age, size of town of residence, place of birth of the individual and of their parents, first language (L1), and educational level. Among them, L1 was—and still is—the most powerful predictor, although it is not entirely determinative. The secessionist movement not only gathers a plurality of Catalan native speakers, but it receives a not insignificant level of support among those who have Spanish as their L1. Conversely, the unionist group, despite being composed primarily by people who have Spanish as their L1 and have their family origins outside Catalonia, has a native Catalan-speaking minority inside. This imperfect division, which is based on ethnolinguistic alignments—and whose relevance cannot be neglected—alleviates the likelihood of an ethnic-based conflict.Cogitatio2021-12-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4531oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4531Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 4 (2021): Secessionism in Liberal Democracies: What Do We Really Know About the Explanations of Secessionism?; 426-4382183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4531https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4531https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4531/4531https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/4531/2085Copyright (c) 2021 Jordi Argelaguethttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessArgelaguet, Jordi2022-12-22T15:16:50Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4531Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:31.044039Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Relevance of Language as a Predictor of the Will for Independence in Catalonia in 1996 and 2020
title The Relevance of Language as a Predictor of the Will for Independence in Catalonia in 1996 and 2020
spellingShingle The Relevance of Language as a Predictor of the Will for Independence in Catalonia in 1996 and 2020
Argelaguet, Jordi
Catalonia; effective number of language groups; independence; language; logistic regression; secessionism; subjective national identity
title_short The Relevance of Language as a Predictor of the Will for Independence in Catalonia in 1996 and 2020
title_full The Relevance of Language as a Predictor of the Will for Independence in Catalonia in 1996 and 2020
title_fullStr The Relevance of Language as a Predictor of the Will for Independence in Catalonia in 1996 and 2020
title_full_unstemmed The Relevance of Language as a Predictor of the Will for Independence in Catalonia in 1996 and 2020
title_sort The Relevance of Language as a Predictor of the Will for Independence in Catalonia in 1996 and 2020
author Argelaguet, Jordi
author_facet Argelaguet, Jordi
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Argelaguet, Jordi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Catalonia; effective number of language groups; independence; language; logistic regression; secessionism; subjective national identity
topic Catalonia; effective number of language groups; independence; language; logistic regression; secessionism; subjective national identity
description The Catalan secessionist parties, if added together, have won all the elections to the Parliament of Catalonia from 2010 to 2021. Their voters have been increasingly mobilized since the start of the controversial reform process of the Statute of Autonomy (2004–2010). The aim of this article is twofold. First, it intends to test whether language is the strongest predictor in preferring independence in two separate and distinct moments, 1996 and 2020. And second, to assess whether its strength has changed—and how—between both years. Only the most exogenous variables to the dependent variable are used in each of two logistic regressions to avoid problems of endogeneity: sex, age, size of town of residence, place of birth of the individual and of their parents, first language (L1), and educational level. Among them, L1 was—and still is—the most powerful predictor, although it is not entirely determinative. The secessionist movement not only gathers a plurality of Catalan native speakers, but it receives a not insignificant level of support among those who have Spanish as their L1. Conversely, the unionist group, despite being composed primarily by people who have Spanish as their L1 and have their family origins outside Catalonia, has a native Catalan-speaking minority inside. This imperfect division, which is based on ethnolinguistic alignments—and whose relevance cannot be neglected—alleviates the likelihood of an ethnic-based conflict.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-10
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4531
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4531
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4531
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4531
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4531
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4531
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4531/4531
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/4531/2085
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Jordi Argelaguet
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Jordi Argelaguet
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 4 (2021): Secessionism in Liberal Democracies: What Do We Really Know About the Explanations of Secessionism?; 426-438
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130671062450176