Is the accounting quality after the mandatory adoption of IFRS a random walk? : Evidence from Europe

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Morais, Ana
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Fialho, Ana, Dionísio, Andreia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/24534
Resumo: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide empirical evidence regarding the classification of European countries based on accounting quality metrics. The authors investigate whether the grouping of countries based on accounting quality levels differs from other classifications based on accounting practices or country-specific factors identified in previous studies. Design/methodology/approach The authors run panel data regressions for 2.078 European listed companies using value relevance and earnings smoothing metrics. The authors also apply cluster analysis to classify the countries. Findings The results suggest that the adoption of a common set of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) did not lead to a similar level of accounting quality of financial information. The authors identified three clusters of countries that are not coincident with previous classifications. Research limitations/implications The results show that the adoption of different accounting practices allowed in IFRS does not necessarily influence accounting quality. Practical implications The results suggest that the way regulators decided to incorporate IFRS into national accounting systems is one issue that may be relevant in explaining the three clusters. Originality/value The paper provides empirical evidence that supports two theoretical assertions. The first is that a classification depends entirely on the characteristics used to represent the countries being classified. The second is that the adoption of a single set of accounting standards does not determine similar accounting practices and does not lead to similar levels of accounting quality.
id RCAP_886b92d7ed2313405066f8c2b47ad22a
oai_identifier_str oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/24534
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Is the accounting quality after the mandatory adoption of IFRS a random walk? : Evidence from EuropeIFRSValue RelevanceEarnings SmoothingAccounting QualityClassification of Accounting SystemsPurpose The purpose of this paper is to provide empirical evidence regarding the classification of European countries based on accounting quality metrics. The authors investigate whether the grouping of countries based on accounting quality levels differs from other classifications based on accounting practices or country-specific factors identified in previous studies. Design/methodology/approach The authors run panel data regressions for 2.078 European listed companies using value relevance and earnings smoothing metrics. The authors also apply cluster analysis to classify the countries. Findings The results suggest that the adoption of a common set of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) did not lead to a similar level of accounting quality of financial information. The authors identified three clusters of countries that are not coincident with previous classifications. Research limitations/implications The results show that the adoption of different accounting practices allowed in IFRS does not necessarily influence accounting quality. Practical implications The results suggest that the way regulators decided to incorporate IFRS into national accounting systems is one issue that may be relevant in explaining the three clusters. Originality/value The paper provides empirical evidence that supports two theoretical assertions. The first is that a classification depends entirely on the characteristics used to represent the countries being classified. The second is that the adoption of a single set of accounting standards does not determine similar accounting practices and does not lead to similar levels of accounting quality.Emerald Publishing LimitedRepositório da Universidade de LisboaMorais, AnaFialho, AnaDionísio, Andreia2022-06-14T20:12:50Z20182018-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/24534engMorais, Ana; Ana Fialho and Andreia Dionísio. (2018). "Is the accounting quality after the mandatory adoption of IFRS a random walk? Evidence from Europe." Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. 19, no. 3: pp. 334-3500967-5426info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-06T14:54:10Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/24534Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:08:33.438120Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is the accounting quality after the mandatory adoption of IFRS a random walk? : Evidence from Europe
title Is the accounting quality after the mandatory adoption of IFRS a random walk? : Evidence from Europe
spellingShingle Is the accounting quality after the mandatory adoption of IFRS a random walk? : Evidence from Europe
Morais, Ana
IFRS
Value Relevance
Earnings Smoothing
Accounting Quality
Classification of Accounting Systems
title_short Is the accounting quality after the mandatory adoption of IFRS a random walk? : Evidence from Europe
title_full Is the accounting quality after the mandatory adoption of IFRS a random walk? : Evidence from Europe
title_fullStr Is the accounting quality after the mandatory adoption of IFRS a random walk? : Evidence from Europe
title_full_unstemmed Is the accounting quality after the mandatory adoption of IFRS a random walk? : Evidence from Europe
title_sort Is the accounting quality after the mandatory adoption of IFRS a random walk? : Evidence from Europe
author Morais, Ana
author_facet Morais, Ana
Fialho, Ana
Dionísio, Andreia
author_role author
author2 Fialho, Ana
Dionísio, Andreia
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Morais, Ana
Fialho, Ana
Dionísio, Andreia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv IFRS
Value Relevance
Earnings Smoothing
Accounting Quality
Classification of Accounting Systems
topic IFRS
Value Relevance
Earnings Smoothing
Accounting Quality
Classification of Accounting Systems
description Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide empirical evidence regarding the classification of European countries based on accounting quality metrics. The authors investigate whether the grouping of countries based on accounting quality levels differs from other classifications based on accounting practices or country-specific factors identified in previous studies. Design/methodology/approach The authors run panel data regressions for 2.078 European listed companies using value relevance and earnings smoothing metrics. The authors also apply cluster analysis to classify the countries. Findings The results suggest that the adoption of a common set of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) did not lead to a similar level of accounting quality of financial information. The authors identified three clusters of countries that are not coincident with previous classifications. Research limitations/implications The results show that the adoption of different accounting practices allowed in IFRS does not necessarily influence accounting quality. Practical implications The results suggest that the way regulators decided to incorporate IFRS into national accounting systems is one issue that may be relevant in explaining the three clusters. Originality/value The paper provides empirical evidence that supports two theoretical assertions. The first is that a classification depends entirely on the characteristics used to represent the countries being classified. The second is that the adoption of a single set of accounting standards does not determine similar accounting practices and does not lead to similar levels of accounting quality.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022-06-14T20:12:50Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/24534
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/24534
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Morais, Ana; Ana Fialho and Andreia Dionísio. (2018). "Is the accounting quality after the mandatory adoption of IFRS a random walk? Evidence from Europe." Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. 19, no. 3: pp. 334-350
0967-5426
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Emerald Publishing Limited
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Emerald Publishing Limited
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131179551555584