Are Our Brains Subcutaneous Machines of Truth-Optimization?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zilhão, António
Data de Publicação: 2005
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/43975
Resumo: Strategies purporting to determine the meaning of inner states of belief-content in terms of their inferential role usually assume the inner structure of the human inferential competence to be that of first order logic plus identity. Considerations of computational complexity and cumbersomeness of representation tend to undermine the plausibility of combining such strategies with this assumption. In this paper I contend that appealing to rules of default reasoning won’t make things turn out any better for the inferential role functionalist.
id RCAP_88c870d6de4378c56b9dd6e0e7f4ede4
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/43975
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Are Our Brains Subcutaneous Machines of Truth-Optimization?Belief, Meaning Constraints, Inferential Role Semantics, Functionalism, Default ReasoningStrategies purporting to determine the meaning of inner states of belief-content in terms of their inferential role usually assume the inner structure of the human inferential competence to be that of first order logic plus identity. Considerations of computational complexity and cumbersomeness of representation tend to undermine the plausibility of combining such strategies with this assumption. In this paper I contend that appealing to rules of default reasoning won’t make things turn out any better for the inferential role functionalist.Repositório da Universidade de LisboaZilhão, António2020-07-12T22:40:42Z20052005-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/43975enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-08T16:44:41Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/43975Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:56:40.124130Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are Our Brains Subcutaneous Machines of Truth-Optimization?
title Are Our Brains Subcutaneous Machines of Truth-Optimization?
spellingShingle Are Our Brains Subcutaneous Machines of Truth-Optimization?
Zilhão, António
Belief, Meaning Constraints, Inferential Role Semantics, Functionalism, Default Reasoning
title_short Are Our Brains Subcutaneous Machines of Truth-Optimization?
title_full Are Our Brains Subcutaneous Machines of Truth-Optimization?
title_fullStr Are Our Brains Subcutaneous Machines of Truth-Optimization?
title_full_unstemmed Are Our Brains Subcutaneous Machines of Truth-Optimization?
title_sort Are Our Brains Subcutaneous Machines of Truth-Optimization?
author Zilhão, António
author_facet Zilhão, António
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zilhão, António
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Belief, Meaning Constraints, Inferential Role Semantics, Functionalism, Default Reasoning
topic Belief, Meaning Constraints, Inferential Role Semantics, Functionalism, Default Reasoning
description Strategies purporting to determine the meaning of inner states of belief-content in terms of their inferential role usually assume the inner structure of the human inferential competence to be that of first order logic plus identity. Considerations of computational complexity and cumbersomeness of representation tend to undermine the plausibility of combining such strategies with this assumption. In this paper I contend that appealing to rules of default reasoning won’t make things turn out any better for the inferential role functionalist.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005
2005-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020-07-12T22:40:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10451/43975
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/43975
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134508878921728