Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Romero-Jimenez, Miguel
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Santodomingo-Rubido, Jacinto, Flores-Rodriguez, Patricia, González-Méijome, José Manuel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/20708
Resumo: PURPOSE: To evaluate the ipact of differente soft contact lens power in the anterior corneal curvature and regulareity in subjects with keratoconus. METHODS: Nineteen subjects (30 eyes) with keratoconus were included in the study. Six corneal topographies were taken with Pentacam Eye System over the naked eye and successively with soft lens (Senofilcon A) powers of -3.00, -1.50, 0.00, +1.50 and +3.00D. Corneal measurements of mean central keratometry (MCK), maximum tangential curvature (TK), maximum front elevation (MFE) and eccentricity (Ecc) at 6 and 8mm diameters as well as anterior corneal surface high order aberrations (i.e. total RMS, spherical- and coma-like and secondary astigmatism) were evaluated. RESULTS: Negative- and plano-powered soft lenses flattened (p<0.05 in all cases), whereas positive-powered lenses did not induce any significant changes (p>0.05 in all cases) in MCK in comparison to the naked eye. The TK power decreased with negative lenses (p<0.05 in both cases) and increased with +3.00D lenses (p=0.03) in comparison to the naked eye. No statistically significant differences were found in MFE with any soft lens power in comparison to the naked eye (p>0.05 in all cases). Corneal eccentricity increased at 8mm diameter for all lens powers (p<0.05 in all cases). No statistically differences were found in HOA RMS and spherical-like aberration (both p>0.05). Statistically differences were found in coma-like and secondary astigmatism (both p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Negative-powered soft contact lenses provide a flatter anterior surface in comparison to positive-powered lenses in subjects with keratoconus and thus they might be more suitable for piggyback contact lens fitting.
id RCAP_89508296fc888984ddfe0b9850f54bea
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/20708
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?Contact lensKeratoconusPiggybackCorneaScience & TechnologyPURPOSE: To evaluate the ipact of differente soft contact lens power in the anterior corneal curvature and regulareity in subjects with keratoconus. METHODS: Nineteen subjects (30 eyes) with keratoconus were included in the study. Six corneal topographies were taken with Pentacam Eye System over the naked eye and successively with soft lens (Senofilcon A) powers of -3.00, -1.50, 0.00, +1.50 and +3.00D. Corneal measurements of mean central keratometry (MCK), maximum tangential curvature (TK), maximum front elevation (MFE) and eccentricity (Ecc) at 6 and 8mm diameters as well as anterior corneal surface high order aberrations (i.e. total RMS, spherical- and coma-like and secondary astigmatism) were evaluated. RESULTS: Negative- and plano-powered soft lenses flattened (p<0.05 in all cases), whereas positive-powered lenses did not induce any significant changes (p>0.05 in all cases) in MCK in comparison to the naked eye. The TK power decreased with negative lenses (p<0.05 in both cases) and increased with +3.00D lenses (p=0.03) in comparison to the naked eye. No statistically significant differences were found in MFE with any soft lens power in comparison to the naked eye (p>0.05 in all cases). Corneal eccentricity increased at 8mm diameter for all lens powers (p<0.05 in all cases). No statistically differences were found in HOA RMS and spherical-like aberration (both p>0.05). Statistically differences were found in coma-like and secondary astigmatism (both p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Negative-powered soft contact lenses provide a flatter anterior surface in comparison to positive-powered lenses in subjects with keratoconus and thus they might be more suitable for piggyback contact lens fitting.Center of Physics, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.Menicon Co., Ltd.Clinical & Experimental Optometry Research LabElsevierUniversidade do MinhoRomero-Jimenez, MiguelSantodomingo-Rubido, JacintoFlores-Rodriguez, PatriciaGonzález-Méijome, José Manuel20132013-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/20708eng1367-048410.1016/j.clae.2012.10.07023108009http://www.journals.elsevier.com/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:19:47Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/20708Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:12:45.846748Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?
title Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?
spellingShingle Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?
Romero-Jimenez, Miguel
Contact lens
Keratoconus
Piggyback
Cornea
Science & Technology
title_short Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?
title_full Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?
title_fullStr Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?
title_full_unstemmed Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?
title_sort Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?
author Romero-Jimenez, Miguel
author_facet Romero-Jimenez, Miguel
Santodomingo-Rubido, Jacinto
Flores-Rodriguez, Patricia
González-Méijome, José Manuel
author_role author
author2 Santodomingo-Rubido, Jacinto
Flores-Rodriguez, Patricia
González-Méijome, José Manuel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Romero-Jimenez, Miguel
Santodomingo-Rubido, Jacinto
Flores-Rodriguez, Patricia
González-Méijome, José Manuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Contact lens
Keratoconus
Piggyback
Cornea
Science & Technology
topic Contact lens
Keratoconus
Piggyback
Cornea
Science & Technology
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the ipact of differente soft contact lens power in the anterior corneal curvature and regulareity in subjects with keratoconus. METHODS: Nineteen subjects (30 eyes) with keratoconus were included in the study. Six corneal topographies were taken with Pentacam Eye System over the naked eye and successively with soft lens (Senofilcon A) powers of -3.00, -1.50, 0.00, +1.50 and +3.00D. Corneal measurements of mean central keratometry (MCK), maximum tangential curvature (TK), maximum front elevation (MFE) and eccentricity (Ecc) at 6 and 8mm diameters as well as anterior corneal surface high order aberrations (i.e. total RMS, spherical- and coma-like and secondary astigmatism) were evaluated. RESULTS: Negative- and plano-powered soft lenses flattened (p<0.05 in all cases), whereas positive-powered lenses did not induce any significant changes (p>0.05 in all cases) in MCK in comparison to the naked eye. The TK power decreased with negative lenses (p<0.05 in both cases) and increased with +3.00D lenses (p=0.03) in comparison to the naked eye. No statistically significant differences were found in MFE with any soft lens power in comparison to the naked eye (p>0.05 in all cases). Corneal eccentricity increased at 8mm diameter for all lens powers (p<0.05 in all cases). No statistically differences were found in HOA RMS and spherical-like aberration (both p>0.05). Statistically differences were found in coma-like and secondary astigmatism (both p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Negative-powered soft contact lenses provide a flatter anterior surface in comparison to positive-powered lenses in subjects with keratoconus and thus they might be more suitable for piggyback contact lens fitting.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/20708
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/20708
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1367-0484
10.1016/j.clae.2012.10.070
23108009
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132563438043136