Ética, moral e virtudes: Anscombe e Ricoeur, leitores de Aristóteles
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/34109 |
Resumo: | This paper discusses the influence and role of Aristotelian ethics in two contemporary ethical theories stemming from different traditions, those put forward by Elizabeth Anscombe and Paul Ricoeur. In different ways, these accounts of ethics can be considered "virtue theories". First, we focus on Anscombe's recovery of Aristotelian "virtue ethics" in the context of her criticism of the standpoint of moral philosophy. We discuss the reception that her 1958 "Modern Moral Philosophy" has had, leading to contradicting interpretations of the role she ascribes to Aristotelian ethics and the problems raised by modern moral philosophy. Second, we discuss the status of the Aristotelian standpoint in Paul Ricoeur's "little ethics", focusing on the primacy given to the ethical aim over moral obligation, and the role of Aristotelian practical wisdom (phronesis) in the overcoming of the difficulties of a modern deontological standpoint. Drawing on these two readings of Aristotelian ethics, we discuss issues such as the prospects of "human flourishing", the conception of the subject underlying these accounts and the extent to which the context-dependent traits of human experience - as against an essentialist standpoint - should be taken into account in these theories. |
id |
RCAP_8a11f3cadce4c4a90228cd7b5d4d0fef |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/34109 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Ética, moral e virtudes: Anscombe e Ricoeur, leitores de AristótelesAnscombeAristotleEthicsRicoeurVirtueThis paper discusses the influence and role of Aristotelian ethics in two contemporary ethical theories stemming from different traditions, those put forward by Elizabeth Anscombe and Paul Ricoeur. In different ways, these accounts of ethics can be considered "virtue theories". First, we focus on Anscombe's recovery of Aristotelian "virtue ethics" in the context of her criticism of the standpoint of moral philosophy. We discuss the reception that her 1958 "Modern Moral Philosophy" has had, leading to contradicting interpretations of the role she ascribes to Aristotelian ethics and the problems raised by modern moral philosophy. Second, we discuss the status of the Aristotelian standpoint in Paul Ricoeur's "little ethics", focusing on the primacy given to the ethical aim over moral obligation, and the role of Aristotelian practical wisdom (phronesis) in the overcoming of the difficulties of a modern deontological standpoint. Drawing on these two readings of Aristotelian ethics, we discuss issues such as the prospects of "human flourishing", the conception of the subject underlying these accounts and the extent to which the context-dependent traits of human experience - as against an essentialist standpoint - should be taken into account in these theories.Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaCadilha, SusanaMarcelo, Gonçalo2021-07-08T13:49:25Z20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/34109por1825-516710.13137/1825-5167/3206485108916909000641469500025info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-26T01:37:44Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/34109Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:27:35.907541Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ética, moral e virtudes: Anscombe e Ricoeur, leitores de Aristóteles |
title |
Ética, moral e virtudes: Anscombe e Ricoeur, leitores de Aristóteles |
spellingShingle |
Ética, moral e virtudes: Anscombe e Ricoeur, leitores de Aristóteles Cadilha, Susana Anscombe Aristotle Ethics Ricoeur Virtue |
title_short |
Ética, moral e virtudes: Anscombe e Ricoeur, leitores de Aristóteles |
title_full |
Ética, moral e virtudes: Anscombe e Ricoeur, leitores de Aristóteles |
title_fullStr |
Ética, moral e virtudes: Anscombe e Ricoeur, leitores de Aristóteles |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ética, moral e virtudes: Anscombe e Ricoeur, leitores de Aristóteles |
title_sort |
Ética, moral e virtudes: Anscombe e Ricoeur, leitores de Aristóteles |
author |
Cadilha, Susana |
author_facet |
Cadilha, Susana Marcelo, Gonçalo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marcelo, Gonçalo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cadilha, Susana Marcelo, Gonçalo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anscombe Aristotle Ethics Ricoeur Virtue |
topic |
Anscombe Aristotle Ethics Ricoeur Virtue |
description |
This paper discusses the influence and role of Aristotelian ethics in two contemporary ethical theories stemming from different traditions, those put forward by Elizabeth Anscombe and Paul Ricoeur. In different ways, these accounts of ethics can be considered "virtue theories". First, we focus on Anscombe's recovery of Aristotelian "virtue ethics" in the context of her criticism of the standpoint of moral philosophy. We discuss the reception that her 1958 "Modern Moral Philosophy" has had, leading to contradicting interpretations of the role she ascribes to Aristotelian ethics and the problems raised by modern moral philosophy. Second, we discuss the status of the Aristotelian standpoint in Paul Ricoeur's "little ethics", focusing on the primacy given to the ethical aim over moral obligation, and the role of Aristotelian practical wisdom (phronesis) in the overcoming of the difficulties of a modern deontological standpoint. Drawing on these two readings of Aristotelian ethics, we discuss issues such as the prospects of "human flourishing", the conception of the subject underlying these accounts and the extent to which the context-dependent traits of human experience - as against an essentialist standpoint - should be taken into account in these theories. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-08T13:49:25Z 2021 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/34109 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/34109 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1825-5167 10.13137/1825-5167/32064 85108916909 000641469500025 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131993660719104 |