Planning Around Polarisation: Components of Finding Common Ground Based on Regeneration Projects in London and Gdańsk

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lorens, Piotr
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Zimnicka, Agnieszka
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6608
Resumo: Various forms of public participation in urban design and planning—as presented and discussed in literature—have recently been challenged by the needs and expectations of different stakeholders, including those coming from the private sector. This comes with a redefinition of the public good and the roles and responsibilities of municipal authorities in post-liberal times. As a result, contemporary participatory processes need to evolve to accommodate not only the wishes and ideas of the local communities, but also those of institutional stakeholders including investors, developers and land owners. This is also accompanied by the demands, expressed by all partners in this process, associated with having a much stronger influence on the final shape of the development policies and planning regulations. The gradual democratisation of spatial planning results in more engagement of stakeholders in the process. The article focuses on the co-design method as a way to bridge the polarisation of interests and find a consensus. The article focuses on identifying co-design components leading to the successful bridging of divisions and the realisation of large-scale regeneration initiatives that could be replicated. The authors have selected examples of large-scale regeneration areas in London and Gdańsk for a qualitative assessment, given the growing polarisation in both Polish and British societies. The discussion will focus on aspects of inclusivity, partnership working in co-design and political risks associated with co-design.
id RCAP_8b583317e33cc444c8f5ccdeb5bb580a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6608
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Planning Around Polarisation: Components of Finding Common Ground Based on Regeneration Projects in London and Gdańskco-design; large-scale urban regeneration; participatory urban planning; polarisation in urban developmentVarious forms of public participation in urban design and planning—as presented and discussed in literature—have recently been challenged by the needs and expectations of different stakeholders, including those coming from the private sector. This comes with a redefinition of the public good and the roles and responsibilities of municipal authorities in post-liberal times. As a result, contemporary participatory processes need to evolve to accommodate not only the wishes and ideas of the local communities, but also those of institutional stakeholders including investors, developers and land owners. This is also accompanied by the demands, expressed by all partners in this process, associated with having a much stronger influence on the final shape of the development policies and planning regulations. The gradual democratisation of spatial planning results in more engagement of stakeholders in the process. The article focuses on the co-design method as a way to bridge the polarisation of interests and find a consensus. The article focuses on identifying co-design components leading to the successful bridging of divisions and the realisation of large-scale regeneration initiatives that could be replicated. The authors have selected examples of large-scale regeneration areas in London and Gdańsk for a qualitative assessment, given the growing polarisation in both Polish and British societies. The discussion will focus on aspects of inclusivity, partnership working in co-design and political risks associated with co-design.Cogitatio Press2023-06-22info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6608https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6608Urban Planning; Vol 8, No 2 (2023): Planning Around Polarization: Learning With and From Controversy and Diversity; 389-4002183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6608https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6608/6608Copyright (c) 2023 Piotr Lorens, Agnieszka Zimnickainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLorens, PiotrZimnicka, Agnieszka2023-06-22T21:15:13Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6608Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:01:17.142274Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Planning Around Polarisation: Components of Finding Common Ground Based on Regeneration Projects in London and Gdańsk
title Planning Around Polarisation: Components of Finding Common Ground Based on Regeneration Projects in London and Gdańsk
spellingShingle Planning Around Polarisation: Components of Finding Common Ground Based on Regeneration Projects in London and Gdańsk
Lorens, Piotr
co-design; large-scale urban regeneration; participatory urban planning; polarisation in urban development
title_short Planning Around Polarisation: Components of Finding Common Ground Based on Regeneration Projects in London and Gdańsk
title_full Planning Around Polarisation: Components of Finding Common Ground Based on Regeneration Projects in London and Gdańsk
title_fullStr Planning Around Polarisation: Components of Finding Common Ground Based on Regeneration Projects in London and Gdańsk
title_full_unstemmed Planning Around Polarisation: Components of Finding Common Ground Based on Regeneration Projects in London and Gdańsk
title_sort Planning Around Polarisation: Components of Finding Common Ground Based on Regeneration Projects in London and Gdańsk
author Lorens, Piotr
author_facet Lorens, Piotr
Zimnicka, Agnieszka
author_role author
author2 Zimnicka, Agnieszka
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lorens, Piotr
Zimnicka, Agnieszka
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv co-design; large-scale urban regeneration; participatory urban planning; polarisation in urban development
topic co-design; large-scale urban regeneration; participatory urban planning; polarisation in urban development
description Various forms of public participation in urban design and planning—as presented and discussed in literature—have recently been challenged by the needs and expectations of different stakeholders, including those coming from the private sector. This comes with a redefinition of the public good and the roles and responsibilities of municipal authorities in post-liberal times. As a result, contemporary participatory processes need to evolve to accommodate not only the wishes and ideas of the local communities, but also those of institutional stakeholders including investors, developers and land owners. This is also accompanied by the demands, expressed by all partners in this process, associated with having a much stronger influence on the final shape of the development policies and planning regulations. The gradual democratisation of spatial planning results in more engagement of stakeholders in the process. The article focuses on the co-design method as a way to bridge the polarisation of interests and find a consensus. The article focuses on identifying co-design components leading to the successful bridging of divisions and the realisation of large-scale regeneration initiatives that could be replicated. The authors have selected examples of large-scale regeneration areas in London and Gdańsk for a qualitative assessment, given the growing polarisation in both Polish and British societies. The discussion will focus on aspects of inclusivity, partnership working in co-design and political risks associated with co-design.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-22
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6608
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6608
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6608
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6608
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6608/6608
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Piotr Lorens, Agnieszka Zimnicka
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Piotr Lorens, Agnieszka Zimnicka
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 8, No 2 (2023): Planning Around Polarization: Learning With and From Controversy and Diversity; 389-400
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131680996327424