Retour sur les noms propres standard modifiés

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kleiber, Georges
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/EL/article/view/4028
Resumo: In this article, we intend to return to the polemic and controversial treatment of the modifi ed proper nouns. In the fi rst part of this article, we expose the main points of the «corrected» version of the analysis of proper nouns presented in Kleiber (1995, 1996), as well as the two main objections made to this analysis by Noailly (2000). In the second and third parts of the present work we examine profoundly each of these objections with a double purpose. First, we aim at proving that they can neither be correctly applied to our proposition nor may be considered a serious obstacle to it. Secondly, we present a general, but precise and unambiguous, overview of the opposition between bare proper nouns, also known as standard proper nouns or non modifi able proper nouns, and modifi ed proper nouns. This overview enables us to reach a theoretical stabi lity and serenity essential to the progression of our knowledge about proper nouns.
id RCAP_8b60659d99f6010f1aff456827976181
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/4028
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Retour sur les noms propres standard modifiésArtigosIn this article, we intend to return to the polemic and controversial treatment of the modifi ed proper nouns. In the fi rst part of this article, we expose the main points of the «corrected» version of the analysis of proper nouns presented in Kleiber (1995, 1996), as well as the two main objections made to this analysis by Noailly (2000). In the second and third parts of the present work we examine profoundly each of these objections with a double purpose. First, we aim at proving that they can neither be correctly applied to our proposition nor may be considered a serious obstacle to it. Secondly, we present a general, but precise and unambiguous, overview of the opposition between bare proper nouns, also known as standard proper nouns or non modifi able proper nouns, and modifi ed proper nouns. This overview enables us to reach a theoretical stabi lity and serenity essential to the progression of our knowledge about proper nouns.Faculdade de Letras da UP2018-05-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/EL/article/view/4028por2182-97131646-6195Kleiber, Georgesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-01-11T04:47:00Zoai:ojs.letras.up.pt/ojs:article/4028Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:29:53.465728Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Retour sur les noms propres standard modifiés
title Retour sur les noms propres standard modifiés
spellingShingle Retour sur les noms propres standard modifiés
Kleiber, Georges
Artigos
title_short Retour sur les noms propres standard modifiés
title_full Retour sur les noms propres standard modifiés
title_fullStr Retour sur les noms propres standard modifiés
title_full_unstemmed Retour sur les noms propres standard modifiés
title_sort Retour sur les noms propres standard modifiés
author Kleiber, Georges
author_facet Kleiber, Georges
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kleiber, Georges
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artigos
topic Artigos
description In this article, we intend to return to the polemic and controversial treatment of the modifi ed proper nouns. In the fi rst part of this article, we expose the main points of the «corrected» version of the analysis of proper nouns presented in Kleiber (1995, 1996), as well as the two main objections made to this analysis by Noailly (2000). In the second and third parts of the present work we examine profoundly each of these objections with a double purpose. First, we aim at proving that they can neither be correctly applied to our proposition nor may be considered a serious obstacle to it. Secondly, we present a general, but precise and unambiguous, overview of the opposition between bare proper nouns, also known as standard proper nouns or non modifi able proper nouns, and modifi ed proper nouns. This overview enables us to reach a theoretical stabi lity and serenity essential to the progression of our knowledge about proper nouns.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-16
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/EL/article/view/4028
url https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/EL/article/view/4028
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2182-9713
1646-6195
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras da UP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras da UP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130756133421056