Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paulo, Alex Fabianne de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Carvalho, Luísa Margarida Cagica, Costa, Teresa, Lopes, José Eduardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/22989
Resumo: Business and academic interests in open innovation have increased; however, the evolution of this topic in the emerging countries is unknown. This article aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of open innovation in developed and emerging countries. The research has covered 1,925 articles between the years 2000 and 2014 in Web of Science (WoS) database. The terms ‘open innovation’, ‘user innovation’, ‘cumulative innovation, ‘trading know-how’, ‘mass innovation’, ‘distributed innovation’, ‘innovative cooperation’ and ‘collaborative innovation’ have been selected as research keywords, considering their presence in the title, abstract or based on the keywords of the articles. The countries were divided into two groups (developed countries, i.e., G7, and emerging countries, i.e., Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa [BRICS]) depending on the degree of research maturity described in their studies on open innovation. Data analyses have revealed a significant increase in the research on open innovation in the past years. However, it was found that a huge discrepancy exists between the two groups on the number of publications and citations. This study confirms, through a bibliometric analysis, some differences which could be found between the two groups and their influence on the reversal of this scenario, which indirectly affects the development of the emerging countries. It was also found that the groups G7 or BRICS are not statistically important factors for the further development of open innovation research. Analyzing individually, G7 countries have greater relevance in the conduction of studies on open innovation, whereas the BRICS countries are still at an embryonic stage of research on this topic.
id RCAP_8b96f49edb0a2c1a23b7b89149c83b9b
oai_identifier_str oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/22989
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries.Open innovationBibliometricsCitation analysisDeveloped countriesEmerging countriesBusiness and academic interests in open innovation have increased; however, the evolution of this topic in the emerging countries is unknown. This article aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of open innovation in developed and emerging countries. The research has covered 1,925 articles between the years 2000 and 2014 in Web of Science (WoS) database. The terms ‘open innovation’, ‘user innovation’, ‘cumulative innovation, ‘trading know-how’, ‘mass innovation’, ‘distributed innovation’, ‘innovative cooperation’ and ‘collaborative innovation’ have been selected as research keywords, considering their presence in the title, abstract or based on the keywords of the articles. The countries were divided into two groups (developed countries, i.e., G7, and emerging countries, i.e., Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa [BRICS]) depending on the degree of research maturity described in their studies on open innovation. Data analyses have revealed a significant increase in the research on open innovation in the past years. However, it was found that a huge discrepancy exists between the two groups on the number of publications and citations. This study confirms, through a bibliometric analysis, some differences which could be found between the two groups and their influence on the reversal of this scenario, which indirectly affects the development of the emerging countries. It was also found that the groups G7 or BRICS are not statistically important factors for the further development of open innovation research. Analyzing individually, G7 countries have greater relevance in the conduction of studies on open innovation, whereas the BRICS countries are still at an embryonic stage of research on this topic.Repositório ComumPaulo, Alex Fabianne deCarvalho, Luísa Margarida CagicaCosta, TeresaLopes, José Eduardo2018-05-28T10:49:11Z20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/22989engPaulo, A., Carvalho, L., Costa, T., Lopes, E. & Galina, S (2017). Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries. Global Business Review, 18(2), pp. 291-307.10.1177/0972150916668600metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-21T09:54:23Zoai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/22989Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:10:07.730893Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries.
title Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries.
spellingShingle Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries.
Paulo, Alex Fabianne de
Open innovation
Bibliometrics
Citation analysis
Developed countries
Emerging countries
title_short Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries.
title_full Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries.
title_fullStr Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries.
title_full_unstemmed Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries.
title_sort Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries.
author Paulo, Alex Fabianne de
author_facet Paulo, Alex Fabianne de
Carvalho, Luísa Margarida Cagica
Costa, Teresa
Lopes, José Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Luísa Margarida Cagica
Costa, Teresa
Lopes, José Eduardo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Comum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paulo, Alex Fabianne de
Carvalho, Luísa Margarida Cagica
Costa, Teresa
Lopes, José Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Open innovation
Bibliometrics
Citation analysis
Developed countries
Emerging countries
topic Open innovation
Bibliometrics
Citation analysis
Developed countries
Emerging countries
description Business and academic interests in open innovation have increased; however, the evolution of this topic in the emerging countries is unknown. This article aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of open innovation in developed and emerging countries. The research has covered 1,925 articles between the years 2000 and 2014 in Web of Science (WoS) database. The terms ‘open innovation’, ‘user innovation’, ‘cumulative innovation, ‘trading know-how’, ‘mass innovation’, ‘distributed innovation’, ‘innovative cooperation’ and ‘collaborative innovation’ have been selected as research keywords, considering their presence in the title, abstract or based on the keywords of the articles. The countries were divided into two groups (developed countries, i.e., G7, and emerging countries, i.e., Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa [BRICS]) depending on the degree of research maturity described in their studies on open innovation. Data analyses have revealed a significant increase in the research on open innovation in the past years. However, it was found that a huge discrepancy exists between the two groups on the number of publications and citations. This study confirms, through a bibliometric analysis, some differences which could be found between the two groups and their influence on the reversal of this scenario, which indirectly affects the development of the emerging countries. It was also found that the groups G7 or BRICS are not statistically important factors for the further development of open innovation research. Analyzing individually, G7 countries have greater relevance in the conduction of studies on open innovation, whereas the BRICS countries are still at an embryonic stage of research on this topic.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-05-28T10:49:11Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/22989
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/22989
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Paulo, A., Carvalho, L., Costa, T., Lopes, E. & Galina, S (2017). Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries. Global Business Review, 18(2), pp. 291-307.
10.1177/0972150916668600
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv metadata only access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv metadata only access
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1817551586463842304