Acute: chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rico-González, Markel
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: González Fernández, Francisco Tomás, Oliveira, Rafael, Clemente, Filipe Manuel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/4628
Resumo: Acute: chronic workload ratio (ACWR) and training monotony have been criticized as injury risk predictors. Therefore, the use of intensity measures should be oriented to understand the variations of intensity across the season. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the main evidence about the ACWR and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer players. The search was made in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and FECYT according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. From the 225 studies initially identified, 27 were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. Existing literature revealed a variety of designs, ACWR and training monotony ranges, variables assessed and durations of the studies. Overall, the range values for ACWR were 0.4–3.39 AU, while those focused on monotony were 0.49–5.7 AU. Regarding ACWR, the ratios located around 0.85–1.25 could predict lower risk values and ratios around ≥1.50 could predict higher risk values. On the contrary, with respect to training monotony, the ratios are approximately between 0.5 and 2.00 (low values in the preseason and low competition weeks and high values when soccer players are in highly scheduled competition weeks). Nevertheless, ACWR and training monotony methods should be addressed and considered based on their real value before using this indicator to reduce injury risk. In fact, the data did not conclusively define injured and non-injured players. For this reason, utilizing standardized approaches will allow for more precise conclusions about professional soccer players.
id RCAP_8bb743762933fdddb5c32868118de7ee
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ipsantarem.pt:10400.15/4628
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Acute: chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: a systematic reviewfootballperformanceperiodizationload managementinjuryglobal positioning systemstrainingteam sportsworkloadtechnologyAcute: chronic workload ratio (ACWR) and training monotony have been criticized as injury risk predictors. Therefore, the use of intensity measures should be oriented to understand the variations of intensity across the season. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the main evidence about the ACWR and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer players. The search was made in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and FECYT according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. From the 225 studies initially identified, 27 were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. Existing literature revealed a variety of designs, ACWR and training monotony ranges, variables assessed and durations of the studies. Overall, the range values for ACWR were 0.4–3.39 AU, while those focused on monotony were 0.49–5.7 AU. Regarding ACWR, the ratios located around 0.85–1.25 could predict lower risk values and ratios around ≥1.50 could predict higher risk values. On the contrary, with respect to training monotony, the ratios are approximately between 0.5 and 2.00 (low values in the preseason and low competition weeks and high values when soccer players are in highly scheduled competition weeks). Nevertheless, ACWR and training monotony methods should be addressed and considered based on their real value before using this indicator to reduce injury risk. In fact, the data did not conclusively define injured and non-injured players. For this reason, utilizing standardized approaches will allow for more precise conclusions about professional soccer players.SageRepositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de SantarémRico-González, MarkelGonzález Fernández, Francisco TomásOliveira, RafaelClemente, Filipe Manuel2023-09-082024-09-08T00:00:00Z2023-09-08T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/4628engRico-González M., González Fernández F.T., Oliveira R. & Clemente F.M. (2023). Acute:chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: A systematic review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 0(0). doi:10.1177/175433712311942831754-338X10.1177/17543371231194283info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-21T07:38:27Zoai:repositorio.ipsantarem.pt:10400.15/4628Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:56:12.757238Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Acute: chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: a systematic review
title Acute: chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: a systematic review
spellingShingle Acute: chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: a systematic review
Rico-González, Markel
football
performance
periodization
load management
injury
global positioning systems
training
team sports
workload
technology
title_short Acute: chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: a systematic review
title_full Acute: chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: a systematic review
title_fullStr Acute: chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Acute: chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: a systematic review
title_sort Acute: chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: a systematic review
author Rico-González, Markel
author_facet Rico-González, Markel
González Fernández, Francisco Tomás
Oliveira, Rafael
Clemente, Filipe Manuel
author_role author
author2 González Fernández, Francisco Tomás
Oliveira, Rafael
Clemente, Filipe Manuel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rico-González, Markel
González Fernández, Francisco Tomás
Oliveira, Rafael
Clemente, Filipe Manuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv football
performance
periodization
load management
injury
global positioning systems
training
team sports
workload
technology
topic football
performance
periodization
load management
injury
global positioning systems
training
team sports
workload
technology
description Acute: chronic workload ratio (ACWR) and training monotony have been criticized as injury risk predictors. Therefore, the use of intensity measures should be oriented to understand the variations of intensity across the season. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the main evidence about the ACWR and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer players. The search was made in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and FECYT according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. From the 225 studies initially identified, 27 were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. Existing literature revealed a variety of designs, ACWR and training monotony ranges, variables assessed and durations of the studies. Overall, the range values for ACWR were 0.4–3.39 AU, while those focused on monotony were 0.49–5.7 AU. Regarding ACWR, the ratios located around 0.85–1.25 could predict lower risk values and ratios around ≥1.50 could predict higher risk values. On the contrary, with respect to training monotony, the ratios are approximately between 0.5 and 2.00 (low values in the preseason and low competition weeks and high values when soccer players are in highly scheduled competition weeks). Nevertheless, ACWR and training monotony methods should be addressed and considered based on their real value before using this indicator to reduce injury risk. In fact, the data did not conclusively define injured and non-injured players. For this reason, utilizing standardized approaches will allow for more precise conclusions about professional soccer players.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-08
2023-09-08T00:00:00Z
2024-09-08T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/4628
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.15/4628
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Rico-González M., González Fernández F.T., Oliveira R. & Clemente F.M. (2023). Acute:chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: A systematic review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 0(0). doi:10.1177/17543371231194283
1754-338X
10.1177/17543371231194283
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sage
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sage
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137050481393664